Sirolimus-eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Versus an Everolimus-eluting Stents

Clinical Trial ID NCT01443104

PubWeight™ 6.09‹?›

🔗 Visit the ClinicalTrials.gov page for NCT01443104

Top papers

Rank Title Journal Year PubWeight™‹?›
1 Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2014 1.74
2 A Review of the Key Clinical Trials of 2014. Cardiol Ther 2015 1.38
3 Impact of Diabetic Status on Outcomes After Revascularization With Drug-Eluting Stents in Relation to Coronary Artery Disease Complexity: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of 6081 Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016 0.77
4 Randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularization: rationale and design of the BIOSCIENCE trial. Am Heart J 2014 0.77
5 Clinical outcomes according to diabetic status in patients treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015 0.76
6 Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2016 0.75
7 Anatomic characteristics and clinical implications of angiographic coronary thrombus: insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of SYNTAX, RESOLUTE, and LEADERS Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015 0.75
Next 100