PubRank
Search
About
Sirolimus-eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Versus an Everolimus-eluting Stents
Clinical Trial ID NCT01443104
PubWeight™ 6.09
‹?›
🔗 Visit the ClinicalTrials.gov page for NCT01443104
Top papers
Rank
Title
Journal
Year
PubWeight™
‹?›
1
Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Lancet
2014
1.74
2
A Review of the Key Clinical Trials of 2014.
Cardiol Ther
2015
1.38
3
Impact of Diabetic Status on Outcomes After Revascularization With Drug-Eluting Stents in Relation to Coronary Artery Disease Complexity: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of 6081 Patients.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2016
0.77
4
Randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularization: rationale and design of the BIOSCIENCE trial.
Am Heart J
2014
0.77
5
Clinical outcomes according to diabetic status in patients treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2015
0.76
6
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
J Am Heart Assoc
2016
0.75
7
Anatomic characteristics and clinical implications of angiographic coronary thrombus: insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of SYNTAX, RESOLUTE, and LEADERS Trials.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2015
0.75
Next 100