Published in N Engl J Med on July 05, 2007
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med (2007) 8.58
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med (2009) 35.94
Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med (2012) 16.91
Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening. N Engl J Med (2012) 7.21
Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol (2007) 3.49
Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol (2008) 3.06
Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla. Ann Surg (2011) 2.90
Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ (2005) 2.86
Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol (2013) 2.52
Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2014) 2.38
Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study. BMJ (2013) 2.25
Management of elderly patients with breast cancer: updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA). Lancet Oncol (2012) 2.16
The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC. Int J Cancer (2010) 2.15
A novel case-control design to estimate the extent of over-diagnosis of breast cancer due to organised population-based mammography screening. Int J Cancer (2014) 2.00
The Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stages I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Perspectives for Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med (2014) 1.98
Incidence of metastatic breast cancer in an Australian population-based cohort of women with non-metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. Med J Aust (2012) 1.95
Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women. Arch Intern Med (2007) 1.93
Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer (2002) 1.89
Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer (2007) 1.75
Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival. Am J Epidemiol (2008) 1.71
Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer. Radiology (2011) 1.59
Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol (2009) 1.58
Helping women make choices about mammography screening: an online randomized trial of a decision aid for 40-year-old women. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 1.48
EUSOMA criteria for performing pre-operative MRI staging in candidates for breast conserving surgery: hype or helpful? Breast (2012) 1.48
Life after breast cancer. Aust Fam Physician (2006) 1.43
Would the real breast cancer please stand up? A global perspective of breast cancer. Breast (2008) 1.42
A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification. Breast (2012) 1.37
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2007) 1.36
Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer (2011) 1.33
Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results. Health Expect (2002) 1.30
Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2006) 1.29
Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer (2008) 1.28
Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol (2014) 1.28
Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2006) 1.22
Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2013) 1.21
Lead-time in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Eur J Cancer (2010) 1.13
Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review. Med J Aust (2002) 1.12
Population estimates of survival in women with screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer taking account of lead time and length bias. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2008) 1.11
Role of ultrasound-guided fine needle cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma staging. Radiol Med (2004) 1.11
Reliability of PSA testing remains unclear. BMJ (2003) 1.07
Digital breast tomosynthesis might not be the optimal modality for detecting microcalcification. Radiology (2015) 1.06
Consumer information materials for diagnostic breast tests: women's views on information and their understanding of test results. Health Expect (2003) 1.04
Increasing trends of cervical adenocarcinoma incidence in Central Italy despite Extensive Screening Programme, 1985-2000. Cancer Detect Prev (2004) 1.04
Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013) 1.03
False-positive screening results in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer (2011) 1.02
The evidence base for breast cancer screening. Prev Med (2011) 1.02
Breast cancer screening: the questions answered. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2012) 1.02
Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2012) 1.00
Mammographic surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer: how accurate? How effective? Breast (2010) 0.96
Does computer-aided detection (CAD) contribute to the performance of digital mammography in a self-referred population? Breast Cancer Res Treat (2007) 0.95
Triage with human papillomavirus testing of women with cytologic abnormalities prompting referral for colposcopy assessment. Cancer (2005) 0.95
Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI. Radiol Med (2013) 0.94
CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol (2008) 0.92
Negligible advantages and excess costs of routine addition of breast ultrasonography to mammography in dense breasts. Tumori (2008) 0.92
Colorectal cancer mortality in two areas of Tuscany with different screening exposures. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 0.91
Breast cancer screening: emerging role of new imaging techniques as adjuncts to mammography. Med J Aust (2009) 0.91
Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes. Lancet Oncol (2006) 0.90
Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Anticancer Res (2014) 0.89
Detection rates of high-grade prostate cancer during subsequent screening visits. Results of the European Randomized Screening Study for Prostate Cancer. Int J Cancer (2006) 0.89
Breast ultrasound in 22,131 asymptomatic women with negative mammography. Breast (2013) 0.89
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and higher long term risk of cancer. BMJ (2007) 0.89
Axillary management in breast cancer: what's new for 2012? Breast (2012) 0.87
Overview of long term care of breast cancer survivors. Maturitas (2011) 0.86
Excess all-cause mortality in the evaluation of a screening trial to account for selective participation. J Med Screen (2013) 0.86
Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer. BMJ (2006) 0.85
Interval breast cancers in screening: the effect of mammography review method on classification. Breast (2007) 0.85
Cost evaluation in a colorectal cancer screening programme by faecal occult blood test in the District of Florence. J Med Screen (2008) 0.85
Accuracy of needle biopsy of breast lesions visible on ultrasound: audit of fine needle versus core needle biopsy in 3233 consecutive samplings with ascertained outcomes. Breast (2011) 0.85
Using patient management as a surrogate for patient health outcomes in diagnostic test evaluation. BMC Med Res Methodol (2012) 0.84
The role of breast MRI in clinical practice. Aust Fam Physician (2009) 0.83
Agreement between the AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 assay in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus and diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical disease. J Clin Microbiol (2006) 0.83
Role of P16(INK4a) expression in identifying CIN2 or more severe lesions among HPV-positive patients referred for colposcopy after abnormal cytology. Cancer (2006) 0.83
Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study. Eur Radiol (2014) 0.83
Misclassification of breast cancer as cause of death in a service screening area. Cancer Causes Control (2008) 0.83
New methods give better estimates of changes in diagnostic accuracy when prior information is provided. J Clin Epidemiol (2006) 0.83
Accuracy of a preoperative model for predicting invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ on vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol (2010) 0.82
Conventional pap smear and liquid-based cervical cytology smear: comparison from the same patient. Tumori (2002) 0.82
Conventional versus digital mammography in the analysis of screen-detected lesions with low positive predictive value. Eur J Radiol (2004) 0.81
Mammography screening in elderly women: efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2003) 0.81
Comparison of the conventional cervical smear and liquid-based cytology: results of a controlled, prospective study in the Abruzzo Region of Italy. Acta Cytol (2008) 0.81
A population-based study of breast cancer prevalence in Australia: predicting the future health care needs of women living with breast cancer. BMC Cancer (2014) 0.81
The impact of different criteria for selecting information to be provided to women undergoing diagnostic breast tests. Patient Educ Couns (2008) 0.81
Accuracy of ultrasound for predicting pathologic response during neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Int J Cancer (2014) 0.80
Management of benign breast conditions. Part 2--breast lumps and lesions. Aust Fam Physician (2005) 0.80
The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening. Prev Med (2011) 0.80