A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes.

PubWeight™: 1.66‹?› | Rank: Top 3%

🔗 View Article (PMID 18313557)

Published in J Clin Epidemiol on April 01, 2008

Authors

Nino A Mushkudiani1, Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven, Adrián V Hernández, Gordon D Murray, Sung C Choi, Andrew I R Maas, Ewout W Steyerberg

Author Affiliations

1: Center for Medical Decision Making, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles citing this

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med (2008) 4.60

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research. PLoS Med (2013) 3.13

Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting. BMC Med (2011) 2.44

Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review. PLoS Med (2012) 2.26

Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models. Crit Care Med (2012) 2.04

External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients. Am J Epidemiol (2010) 2.03

The role of markers of inflammation in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol (2013) 2.01

Advancing care for traumatic brain injury: findings from the IMPACT studies and perspectives on future research. Lancet Neurol (2013) 1.94

Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med (2010) 1.65

IMPACT recommendations for improving the design and analysis of clinical trials in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics (2010) 1.53

Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J (2014) 1.44

Brain injury biomarkers may improve the predictive power of the IMPACT outcome calculator. J Neurotrauma (2012) 1.10

Predicting 14-day mortality after severe traumatic brain injury: application of the IMPACT models in the brain trauma foundation TBI-trac® New York State database. J Neurotrauma (2012) 1.06

Performance of IMPACT, CRASH and Nijmegen models in predicting six month outcome of patients with severe or moderate TBI: an external validation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med (2014) 0.93

The sequential trauma score - a new instrument for the sequential mortality prediction in major trauma. Eur J Med Res (2010) 0.93

S100b as a prognostic biomarker in outcome prediction for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma (2013) 0.92

MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review. Brain Topogr (2013) 0.87

New astroglial injury-defined biomarkers for neurotrauma assessment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2017) 0.85

Development of prognostic models for patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Int J Clin Exp Med (2015) 0.81

Predicting intracranial hemorrhage after traumatic brain injury in low and middle-income countries: a prognostic model based on a large, multi-center, international cohort. BMC Emerg Med (2012) 0.79

Midline shift in relation to thickness of traumatic acute subdural hematoma predicts mortality. BMC Neurol (2015) 0.78

Converting three general-cognitive function scales into persian and assessment of their validity and reliability. Int J Prev Med (2011) 0.77

Early prediction of outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a simple and practical model. BMC Emerg Med (2016) 0.75

Developing Risk Prediction Models for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: a Systematic Review of Methodology and Reporting Quality. Indian J Surg (2016) 0.75

Outcome Prediction after Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison of the Performance of Routinely Used Severity Scores and Multivariable Prognostic Models. J Neurosci Rural Pract (2017) 0.75

The ability of two scoring systems to predict in-hospital mortality of patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injuries in a Moroccan intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med (2014) 0.75

Formal and informal prediction of recurrent stroke and myocardial infarction after stroke: a systematic review and evaluation of clinical prediction models in a new cohort. BMC Med (2014) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2005) 21.91

A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med (2014) 18.12

Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med (2010) 14.49

Hypothermia for Intracranial Hypertension after Traumatic Brain Injury. N Engl J Med (2015) 6.91

Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial. Lancet (2005) 6.24

The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of acute stroke (SCAST): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet (2011) 5.17

Aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events in a general population screened for a low ankle brachial index: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2010) 5.10

Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med (2007) 4.61

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med (2008) 4.60

Predictive testing for complex diseases using multiple genes: fact or fiction? Genet Med (2006) 4.48

Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ (2010) 4.47

Clinical trials in head injury. J Neurotrauma (2002) 4.34

Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 3.66

Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma (2008) 3.58

Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet (2013) 3.41

Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology (2009) 3.20

A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J (2011) 3.14

Imputation is beneficial for handling missing data in predictive models. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 3.08

Evaluation of newer risk markers for coronary heart disease risk classification: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.05

Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg (2010) 3.02

Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med (2014) 3.00

Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery (2005) 2.97

Traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med (2014) 2.84

Systematic review of guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment: Which recommendations should clinicians follow for a cardiovascular health check? Arch Intern Med (2010) 2.82

Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements. J Clin Epidemiol (2004) 2.77

A clinical prognostic scoring system for Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet Neurol (2007) 2.73

Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome. JAMA (2006) 2.73

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2015) 2.71

Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma (2007) 2.57

Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol (2013) 2.55

Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma (2007) 2.54

C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and soluble adhesion molecules as predictors of progressive peripheral atherosclerosis in the general population: Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation (2005) 2.53

Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients. J Neurosurg (2003) 2.51

Coronary calcium score improves classification of coronary heart disease risk in the elderly: the Rotterdam study. J Am Coll Cardiol (2010) 2.50

Combined anatomical and clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score. Eur Heart J (2012) 2.43

Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 2.42

Spreading depolarisations and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol (2011) 2.40

Reclassification calculations for persons with incomplete follow-up. Ann Intern Med (2010) 2.35

The impact of genotype frequencies on the clinical validity of genomic profiling for predicting common chronic diseases. Genet Med (2007) 2.34

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: a framework for researching clinical outcomes. BMJ (2013) 2.31

Fluid thresholds and outcome from severe brain injury. Crit Care Med (2002) 2.29

Validity of prognostic models: when is a model clinically useful? Semin Urol Oncol (2002) 2.29

Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review. PLoS Med (2012) 2.26

Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol (2007) 2.26

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research. PLoS Med (2013) 2.23

The efficacy of the Pavlik harness, the Craig splint and the von Rosen splint in the management of neonatal dysplasia of the hip. A comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2002) 2.21

Clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Am J Epidemiol (2012) 2.20

Patients with Barrett's esophagus perceive their risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma as low. Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 2.18

Baseline characteristics and statistical power in randomized controlled trials: selection, prognostic targeting, or covariate adjustment? Crit Care Med (2009) 2.16

The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC. Int J Cancer (2010) 2.15

Graphical assessment of internal and external calibration of logistic regression models by using loess smoothers. Stat Med (2013) 2.13

Regional differences in patient characteristics, case management, and outcomes in traumatic brain injury: experience from the tirilazad trials. J Neurosurg (2002) 2.12

Associations of diabetes mellitus with total life expectancy and life expectancy with and without cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med (2007) 2.12

IMPACT database of traumatic brain injury: design and description. J Neurotrauma (2007) 2.10

Colorectal neoplasia in veterans is associated with Barrett's esophagus but not with proton-pump inhibitor or aspirin/NSAID use. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 2.10

Systematic review of guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. J Vasc Surg (2011) 2.08

Single-dose brachytherapy versus metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet (2004) 2.06

Design and analysis of phase III trials with ordered outcome scales: the concept of the sliding dichotomy. J Neurotrauma (2005) 2.06

Medical research in emergency research in the European Union member states: tensions between theory and practice. Intensive Care Med (2014) 2.05

Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models. Crit Care Med (2012) 2.04

External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients. Am J Epidemiol (2010) 2.03

A risk-based strategy improves prostate-specific antigen-driven detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2009) 2.02

Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study. BMJ (2008) 2.00

Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 1.97

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. J Neurotrauma (2005) 1.96

Proton pump inhibitors reduce the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2012) 1.96

Advancing care for traumatic brain injury: findings from the IMPACT studies and perspectives on future research. Lancet Neurol (2013) 1.94

The PREMM(1,2,6) model predicts risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 germline mutations based on cancer history. Gastroenterology (2010) 1.88

Relative value of inflammatory, hemostatic, and rheological factors for incident myocardial infarction and stroke: the Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation (2007) 1.85

Competing risks and the clinical community: irrelevance or ignorance? Stat Med (2011) 1.80

Replication study of 10 genetic polymorphisms associated with coronary heart disease in a specific high-risk population with familial hypercholesterolemia. Eur Heart J (2008) 1.80

Untreated clinical course of cerebral cavernous malformations: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol (2012) 1.79

Menorrhagia II: is the 80-mL blood loss criterion useful in management of complaint of menorrhagia? Am J Obstet Gynecol (2004) 1.79

Predicting retroperitoneal histology in postchemotherapy testicular germ cell cancer: a model update and multicentre validation with more than 1000 patients. Eur Urol (2006) 1.78

Low dose aspirin and cognitive function in middle aged to elderly adults: randomised controlled trial. BMJ (2008) 1.77

Factors that predict response of patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B to peginterferon-alfa. Gastroenterology (2009) 1.76

Assessing improvement in disease prediction using net reclassification improvement: impact of risk cut-offs and number of risk categories. Eur J Epidemiol (2012) 1.75

Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer section Rotterdam. Eur Urol (2013) 1.73

Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol (2010) 1.73

The risk of inflammatory bowel disease-related colorectal carcinoma is limited: results from a nationwide nested case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol (2010) 1.73

FGFR3 mutations and a normal CK20 staining pattern define low-grade noninvasive urothelial bladder tumours. Eur Urol (2007) 1.72

Interpreting the concordance statistic of a logistic regression model: relation to the variance and odds ratio of a continuous explanatory variable. BMC Med Res Methodol (2012) 1.71