Published in Implement Sci on July 23, 2008
Do physicians' recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options? Health Expect (2011) 0.97
Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials. Trials (2014) 0.83
Shared decision-making and health for First Nations, Métis and Inuit women: a study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2012) 0.79
A qualitative exploration of the informed consent process in hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical research and opportunities for improvement. Bone Marrow Transplant (2016) 0.75
Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med (1998) 20.81
Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making (1995) 12.19
Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA (2000) 10.91
Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA (1995) 10.12
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ (1999) 9.70
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ (2006) 9.04
Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA (2004) 7.97
On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med (1982) 7.85
The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med (1997) 7.19
Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med (1992) 6.68
Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med (2004) 6.33
Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet (2001) 6.07
A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns (1998) 5.40
Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ (2002) 4.63
Understanding patients' decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA (1993) 4.60
Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun (2001) 4.54
A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (1999) 4.31
Conscientious autonomy: displacing decisions in health care. Hastings Cent Rep (2005) 3.90
Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst (1998) 3.89
Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making (2003) 3.70
Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ (2003) 3.55
The Ottawa patient decision aids. Eff Clin Pract (1999) 3.22
Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for postmenopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy. Med Decis Making (1998) 3.18
A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence. J Eval Clin Pract (2006) 2.91
Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature. Ann Oncol (2000) 2.75
Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. BMJ (2001) 2.71
A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med (1999) 2.68
Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials. Ann Emerg Med (1988) 2.68
Obtaining informed consent. Form or substance. Arch Intern Med (1969) 2.52
The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract (2000) 2.41
Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care. BMJ (2001) 2.30
Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns (1999) 2.27
Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families? J Clin Oncol (1994) 2.24
Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans Administration Hospitals. JAMA (1982) 1.99
Zinc supplementation reduces the incidence of acute lower respiratory infections in infants and preschool children: a double-blind, controlled trial. Pediatrics (1998) 1.95
The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychol Bull (2003) 1.80
An evidence-based approach to managing women's decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs (2002) 1.77
Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study. Arch Dis Child (1998) 1.73
Practical experiences in obtaining informed consent for a vaccine trial in rural Africa. N Engl J Med (1997) 1.67
Patient decision support intervention: increased consistency with decision analytic models. Med Care (1999) 1.64
Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process. Patient Educ Couns (1997) 1.64
Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB (2001) 1.62
How informed is informed consent? The BHAT experience. Control Clin Trials (1981) 1.55
Informed consent: how much does the patient understand? Clin Pharmacol Ther (1980) 1.50
An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet (2001) 1.48
Is information always a good thing? Helping patients make "good" decisions. Med Care (2002) 1.42
How readable are subject consent forms? JAMA (1980) 1.38
Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: how much do patients understand? AJR Am J Roentgenol (1995) 1.37
Does informed consent alter elderly patients' preferences for colorectal cancer screening? Results of a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med (2000) 1.33
Impact of educational print materials on knowledge, attitudes, and interest in BRCA1/BRCA2: testing among Ashkenazi Jewish women. Cancer (2001) 1.24
Informed consent and decision-making: patients' experiences of the process of recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials. Patient Educ Couns (2002) 1.24
Literacy, comprehension, and informed consent in clinical research. Cancer Invest (2001) 1.15
Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis. J Med Ethics (2005) 1.09
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the informed consent process. Ann Intern Med (2004) 0.94
A tailored intervention to aid decision-making about hormone replacement therapy. Am J Public Health (2002) 0.92
[Making a decision about hormone replacement therapy. A randomized controlled trial]. Can Fam Physician (2001) 0.91
Psychosocial aspects of participation in early anticancer drug trials. Report of a pilot study. Cancer Nurs (1996) 0.89
Stunned myocardium in the toxic shock syndrome. Ann Intern Med (1992) 0.76
Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med (2003) 12.98
Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review. Med Care (2006) 4.29
Do opiates affect the clinical evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain? JAMA (2006) 4.15
The tension between needing to improve care and knowing how to do it. N Engl J Med (2007) 3.84
Interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing: a systematic review and quantitative analysis. Med Care (2008) 2.86
The efficacy and safety of heparin in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Crit Care Med (2015) 2.85
Prolonged therapeutic hypothermia after traumatic brain injury in adults: a systematic review. JAMA (2003) 2.73
Age of transfused blood in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med (2015) 2.52
Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 2.46
Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med (2011) 2.45
Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review. Acad Med (2010) 2.44
Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research. Trials (2011) 2.43
Reducing antimicrobial therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria among noncatheterized inpatients: a proof-of-concept study. Clin Infect Dis (2014) 2.37
Treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation in noncardiac intensive care unit patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med (2008) 2.33
Does this patient have acute cholecystitis? JAMA (2003) 2.28
Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med (2015) 2.21
Can erythropoietin eradicate red cell transfusions in the critically ill? Crit Care Med (2006) 2.21
The future of clinical trials evaluating blood substitutes. JAMA (2008) 2.14
Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2014) 2.01
Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions. Med Educ (2012) 1.97
Severe group a streptococcal soft-tissue infections in Ontario: 1992-1996. Clin Infect Dis (2002) 1.93
Threats to validity in the design and conduct of preclinical efficacy studies: a systematic review of guidelines for in vivo animal experiments. PLoS Med (2013) 1.92
Adult cystic fibrosis exacerbations and new strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2003) 1.87
Effect of a liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategy on mortality in patients with moderate to severe head injury. Neurocrit Care (2006) 1.87
Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis is not required with a CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells/microl when viral replication is suppressed. AIDS (2007) 1.85
Medication reconciliation during transitions of care as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med (2013) 1.85
Revisiting transfusion practices in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med (2005) 1.78
Meta-analysis: intravenous immunoglobulin in critically ill adult patients with sepsis. Ann Intern Med (2007) 1.75
Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 1.74
Determination of neurologic prognosis and clinical decision making in adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of Canadian intensivists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists. Crit Care Med (2013) 1.72
Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ (2011) 1.72
Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study). Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2013) 1.63
Have last-observation-carried-forward analyses caused us to favour more toxic dementia therapies over less toxic alternatives? A systematic review. Open Med (2009) 1.62
Justice in translation: from bench to bedside in the developing world. Lancet (2008) 1.60
Research ethics. Rethinking research ethics: the case of postmarketing trials. Science (2012) 1.57
Home-based intermediate care program vs hospitalization: Cost comparison study. Can Fam Physician (2008) 1.55
Increasing placebo responses over time in U.S. clinical trials of neuropathic pain. Pain (2015) 1.55
Single and combination antibiotic susceptibilities of planktonic, adherent, and biofilm-grown Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates cultured from sputa of adults with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol (2002) 1.53
Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 1.53
Publication and reporting conduct for pharmacodynamic analyses of tumor tissue in early-phase oncology trials. Clin Cancer Res (2012) 1.52
Red blood cell transfusions in critically ill patients. JAMA (2002) 1.51
Influence of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging in primary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Intern Med (2011) 1.50
Red blood cell transfusion practices amongst Canadian anesthesiologists: a survey. Can J Anaesth (2006) 1.47
The structure of clinical translation: efficiency, information, and ethics. Hastings Cent Rep (2015) 1.46
Acute rheumatic fever in First Nations communities in northwestern Ontario: Social determinants of health "bite the heart". Can Fam Physician (2015) 1.44
Cardiac complications in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS Med (2011) 1.42
Clinical problem-solving. Forgotten but not gone. N Engl J Med (2004) 1.39
Clinical problem-solving. Lost in transcription. N Engl J Med (2006) 1.38
Erythropoietin-receptor agonists in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ (2007) 1.38
Who is the research subject in cluster randomized trials in health research? Trials (2011) 1.36
Inadequate reporting of research ethics review and informed consent in cluster randomised trials: review of random sample of published trials. BMJ (2011) 1.36
Does user-centred design affect the efficiency, usability and safety of CPOE order sets? J Am Med Inform Assoc (2011) 1.35
Patient safety in emergency medical services: a systematic review of the literature. Prehosp Emerg Care (2011) 1.35
Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 1.35
When is informed consent required in cluster randomized trials in health research? Trials (2011) 1.33
Quality improvement: science and action. Circulation (2009) 1.32
Adverse events detected by clinical surveillance on an obstetric service. Obstet Gynecol (2006) 1.31
Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study. Trials (2009) 1.30
Frequency of adverse events in patients with poor anticoagulation: a meta-analysis. CMAJ (2007) 1.29
Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 1.28
Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving? BMJ Qual Saf (2013) 1.27
Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 1.26
Promoting best practices for control of respiratory infections: collaboration between primary care and public health services. Can Fam Physician (2006) 1.23
Research ethics. Beyond access vs. protection in trials of innovative therapies. Science (2010) 1.23
Challenges in systematic reviews: synthesis of topics related to the delivery, organization, and financing of health care. Ann Intern Med (2005) 1.20
Effects of rapid response systems on clinical outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Med (2007) 1.19
Usability evaluation of order sets in a computerised provider order entry system. BMJ Qual Saf (2011) 1.18
Refocusing quality measurement to best support quality improvement: local ownership of quality measurement by clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf (2012) 1.15
Sustaining quality improvement and patient safety training in graduate medical education: lessons from social theory. Acad Med (2013) 1.15
Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. Am J Clin Pathol (2003) 1.15
Tell me about the context, and more. BMJ Qual Saf (2011) 1.14
Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth (2011) 1.14
Should preclinical studies be registered? Nat Biotechnol (2012) 1.14
Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research? Trials (2011) 1.13
Improving patient safety: moving beyond the "hype" of medical errors. CMAJ (2005) 1.12
What makes public health studies ethical? Dissolving the boundary between research and practice. BMC Med Ethics (2014) 1.12
Expert opinion on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer parallels evidence from a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One (2012) 1.11
Use of an interactive, telephone-based self-management support program to identify adverse events among ambulatory diabetes patients. J Gen Intern Med (2008) 1.10
Combining ratings from multiple physician reviewers helped to overcome the uncertainty associated with adverse event classification. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 1.10
Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: is simple oral hydration similar to intravenous? A systematic review of the evidence. PLoS One (2013) 1.09
Identifying patients with post-discharge care problems using an interactive voice response system. J Gen Intern Med (2009) 1.08
Improving antibiotic selection: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of quality improvement strategies. Med Care (2006) 1.08
The impact of adverse events in the intensive care unit on hospital mortality and length of stay. BMC Health Serv Res (2008) 1.08
Still no magic bullets: pursuing more rigorous research in quality improvement. Am J Med (2004) 1.07
Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? No. BMJ (2008) 1.06
Is acetylcysteine effective in preventing contrast-related nephropathy? A meta-analysis. Am J Med (2004) 1.06
Informed consent documents do not encourage good-quality decision making. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.04
What is the role and authority of gatekeepers in cluster randomized trials in health research? Trials (2012) 1.04
Avoiding transfusions in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials of aprotinin. Anesth Analg (2006) 1.03
The elephant of patient safety: what you see depends on how you look. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf (2010) 1.03
Position statement on the provision and procurement of human eggs for stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell (2013) 1.02
Detection, treatment, and prevention of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: recommendations from an International Working Group. J Chemother (2013) 1.02
Treatment of polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Transplantation (2010) 1.02
Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 1.01
The many faces of error disclosure: a common set of elements and a definition. J Gen Intern Med (2007) 1.00
Management of MRI wait lists in Canada. Healthc Policy (2009) 0.99
The questionable use of unequal allocation in confirmatory trials. Neurology (2013) 0.99