Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium.

PubWeight™: 1.64‹?› | Rank: Top 3%

🔗 View Article (PMC 2749320)

Published in Gastrointest Endosc on March 01, 2009

Authors

David A Lieberman1, Douglas O Faigel, Judith R Logan, Nora Mattek, Jennifer Holub, Glenn Eisen, Cynthia Morris, Robert Smith, Marion Nadel

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. lieberma@ohsu.edu

Articles citing this

Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci (2010) 2.04

Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.96

The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging. J Digit Imaging (2009) 1.48

Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2011) 1.28

Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees. BMC Med Educ (2013) 1.23

Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center. Gut Liver (2010) 1.22

Impact of the 2008-2009 economic recession on screening colonoscopy utilization among the insured. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2011) 1.21

Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 1.05

Endoscopy reporting standards. Can J Gastroenterol (2013) 0.98

Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am (2013) 0.97

Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol (2012) 0.94

Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program. Diagn Ther Endosc (2010) 0.94

Quality of colonoscopy reporting in community practice. Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 0.92

Pitfalls of using administrative data for research. Dig Dis Sci (2010) 0.86

Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication. Can J Gastroenterol (2010) 0.85

Development and validation of the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) for assessment of procedural sedation quality. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 0.82

Which should go first during same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy? A randomized prospective study focusing on colonoscopy performance. Surg Endosc (2013) 0.78

Quality metrics in endoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) (2013) 0.78

Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Cancer (2013) 0.78

Isn't it time to stop talking about colonoscopy quality and start doing something about it? Dig Dis Sci (2011) 0.78

Diversity of endoscopy center operations and practice variation across California's safety-net hospital system: a statewide survey. BMC Res Notes (2013) 0.77

The cap-assisted technique enhances colonoscopy training: prospective randomized study of six trainees. Surg Endosc (2012) 0.76

A primer on endoscopic electronic medical records. Clin Colon Rectal Surg (2010) 0.75

Quality indicators in colonoscopy practice. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) (2012) 0.75

Influence of patient age and colorectal polyp size on histopathology findings. Arq Bras Cir Dig (2014) 0.75

A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016) 0.75

The Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting in Usual Practice: Are Endoscopists Reporting Key Data Elements? Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016) 0.75

The Polyp Manager: a new tool for optimal polyp documentation during colonoscopy. A pilot study. Endosc Int Open (2016) 0.75

A wide variation of the quality of colonoscopy reporting system in the real clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea. Intest Res (2016) 0.75

GRG Profiles: David A. Lieberman. Dig Dis Sci (2015) 0.75

Location, size, and distance: criteria for quality in esophagogastroduodenos copy reporting for pre-operative gastric cancer evaluation. Surg Endosc (2014) 0.75

Articles cited by this

Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med (2003) 15.53

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology (2003) 14.67

Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med (2000) 13.21

Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med (2006) 10.52

Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med (2006) 8.18

Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med (2006) 7.62

Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA (2004) 6.98

Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med (2000) 6.90

Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol (2002) 6.63

Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med (2000) 6.53

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.51

Celecoxib for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med (2006) 6.15

Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med (2005) 5.88

Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med (2006) 5.10

How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology (2004) 4.69

Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet (2005) 4.65

Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med (2004) 4.49

Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology (2005) 4.31

A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 4.09

Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network. N Engl J Med (2000) 4.08

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 3.83

CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology (2005) 3.43

The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med (2003) 3.32

Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 3.23

Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 3.16

Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 3.06

Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med (2006) 2.98

Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 2.82

Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 2.63

Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices. Am J Med (2003) 2.56

Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers. Gastroenterology (2006) 2.23

Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 2.14

Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2004) 2.01

Can ASA grade or Goldman's cardiac risk index predict peri-operative mortality? A study of 16,227 patients. Anaesthesia (1997) 1.37

Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2006) 1.29

Articles by these authors

Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 9.03

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.51

Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin (2006) 4.73

Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States. Cancer (2013) 4.24

Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 3.83

EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 3.61

Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol (2003) 3.51

Autophagy is cytoprotective during cisplatin injury of renal proximal tubular cells. Kidney Int (2008) 3.45

Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2004) 3.24

Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 3.23

ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 3.12

Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology (2008) 3.11

Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. Med Care (2013) 2.89

Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 2.82

Intelligent Systems For Assessing Aging Changes: home-based, unobtrusive, and continuous assessment of aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci (2011) 2.71

ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 2.63

Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 2.60

The structural basis of blebbistatin inhibition and specificity for myosin II. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2005) 2.45

Varenicline in the routine treatment of tobacco dependence: a pre-post comparison with nicotine replacement therapy and an evaluation in those with mental illness. Addiction (2007) 2.38

ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc (2004) 2.33

Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity. CA Cancer J Clin (2004) 2.19

A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med (2003) 2.19

Utilization of upper endoscopy for surveillance of gastric ulcers in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol (2008) 2.14

ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 2.11

Management of anticoagulation before and after gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2009) 2.08

Fish oil supplementation and risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable defibrillators: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2005) 2.07

The impact of prevention on reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease. Circulation (2008) 2.05

Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 2.04

ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage, updated July 2005. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 1.99

Novel algorithms and the benefits of comparative validation. Bioinformatics (2013) 1.97

Complications of pediatric EGD: a 4-year experience in PEDS-CORI. Gastrointest Endosc (2007) 1.89

New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA (2011) 1.88

Endoscopic evaluation of patients with dyspepsia: results from the national endoscopic data repository. Gastroenterology (2004) 1.88

Promoting early detection tests for colorectal carcinoma and adenomatous polyps: a framework for action: the strategic plan of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Cancer (2002) 1.87

"Cutting the cord" for capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology (2002) 1.85

Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 1.84

Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database. Gastrointest Endosc (2012) 1.83

Prospective evaluation of the sensitivity of physical examination in chest trauma. J Trauma (2002) 1.80

A multicenter randomized comparison of the Endocapsule and the Pillcam SB. Gastrointest Endosc (2008) 1.74

ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and the management of cystic lesions and inflammatory fluid collections of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 1.74

Electrical coupling between mammalian cones. Curr Biol (2002) 1.72

Esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.68

Comparison of Transgastric NOTES and laparoscopic peritoneoscopy for detection of peritoneal metastases. Ann Surg (2009) 1.68

Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 1.65

Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations. Soc Sci Med (2004) 1.64

Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 1.64

Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of valdecoxib with naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis. J Fam Pract (2002) 1.61

Testing for prostate and colorectal cancer: comparison of self-report and medical record audit. Prev Med (2004) 1.60

Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.60

Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.57

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 1.56

Prevalence of polyps greater than 9 mm in a consortium of diverse clinical practice settings in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2005) 1.55

Preparation of patients for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 1.54

Guideline on the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.54

Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer. Biostatistics (2003) 1.54

Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2003) 1.53

Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting. CA Cancer J Clin (2004) 1.52

Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013) 1.52

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.50

Interobserver agreement among endosonographers for the diagnosis of neoplastic versus non-neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 1.49

A system-wide intervention to improve HIV testing in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med (2008) 1.46

Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.46

Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng (2006) 1.44

Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 1.42

Primary hepatic lymphoma presenting as fulminant hepatic failure with hyperferritinemia: a case report. J Med Case Rep (2008) 1.41

ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the patient with lower-GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 1.39

Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.39

ASGE guideline: endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc (2006) 1.36

Yield of tissue sampling for submucosal lesions evaluated by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 1.34

An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage in a large multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc (2008) 1.32

Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.32

ASGE guideline: complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 1.32

GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc (2003) 1.30

Neuropathologic basis of white matter hyperintensity accumulation with advanced age. Neurology (2013) 1.29

Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater (2010) 1.26

Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: mimic of pancreatic endocrine tumor diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol (2008) 1.26

The impact of prevention on reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care (2008) 1.25

Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.25

Complications of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.24

ASGE guideline: the management of low-molecular-weight heparin and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 1.23

Prevalence of upper gastrointestinal tract findings in patients with noncardiac chest pain versus those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related symptoms: results from a national endoscopic database. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 1.22

Dual activation of STAT-3 and Akt is required during the trigger phase of ischaemic preconditioning. Cardiovasc Res (2008) 1.21

Development of a federally funded demonstration colorectal cancer screening program. Prev Chronic Dis (2008) 1.19

Is the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification useful in risk stratification for endoscopic procedures? Gastrointest Endosc (2013) 1.19

Novel markers of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in fine-needle aspiration: mesothelin and prostate stem cell antigen labeling increases accuracy in cytologically borderline cases. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol (2003) 1.18

Age- and sex-specific yield of Barrett's esophagus by endoscopy indication. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 1.17

One walk a year to 1000 within a year: continuous in-home unobtrusive gait assessment of older adults. Gait Posture (2011) 1.16

A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam ESO esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol (2005) 1.14

ASGE Guideline: Guidelines for endoscopy in pregnant and lactating women. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 1.13

A conceptual model of the influence of stress on female reproduction. Reproduction (2003) 1.12

Comparison of morning versus afternoon cecal intubation rates. BMC Gastroenterol (2007) 1.11