Published in Radiology on February 22, 2011
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.31
Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies. Med Phys (2012) 1.16
Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment. Eur J Radiol (2012) 1.12
Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance. Radiology (2014) 0.96
Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway. Br J Radiol (2012) 0.95
Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice. Radiology (2011) 0.93
Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry. Acad Radiol (2013) 0.92
Validation of a Medicare Claims-based Algorithm for Identifying Breast Cancers Detected at Screening Mammography. Med Care (2016) 0.91
Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme. Phys Med Biol (2014) 0.90
Diagnostic mammography: identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria. Radiology (2013) 0.89
Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2014) 0.85
A new quantitative image analysis method for improving breast cancer diagnosis using DCE-MRI examinations. Med Phys (2015) 0.85
Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women. Med Care (2012) 0.85
Improving the performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method. Phys Med Biol (2012) 0.83
Is confidence of mammographic assessment a good predictor of accuracy? AJR Am J Roentgenol (2012) 0.80
Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations? Acad Radiol (2011) 0.80
Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study. Eur Radiol (2014) 0.79
Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomized clinical trial designed to improve interpretation of screening mammography. Acad Radiol (2013) 0.79
An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses. J Digit Imaging (2012) 0.79
Imaging-based screening: maximizing benefits and minimizing harms. Clin Imaging (2015) 0.79
Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2015) 0.79
Association between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer risk. Breast J (2014) 0.79
Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis. Med Phys (2015) 0.79
The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Acad Radiol (2014) 0.78
Shuffling your way out of change blindness. Psychon Bull Rev (2016) 0.77
Introduction of organised mammography screening in Tyrol: results following first year of complete rollout. BMC Public Health (2011) 0.76
Criteria for identifying radiologists with acceptable screening mammography interpretive performance on basis of multiple performance measures. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2015) 0.75
Radiologists' interpretive skills in screening vs. diagnostic mammography: are they related? Clin Imaging (2016) 0.75
Predictors of preoperative MRI for breast cancer: differences by data source. J Comp Eff Res (2015) 0.75
Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (2017) 0.75
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med (2003) 7.73
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1997) 7.62
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA (2003) 4.53
Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology (2006) 4.41
Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 4.07
Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 3.41
Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 2.92
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology (2009) 2.88
European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. Ann Oncol (2007) 2.84
International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 2.75
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.72
Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology (2001) 2.36
Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology (2010) 2.06
Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 2.01
The periodic health examination provided to asymptomatic older women: an assessment using standardized patients. Ann Intern Med (1993) 1.66
Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program. Radiology (2000) 1.41
Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004. Radiology (2010) 1.24
The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. Clin Breast Cancer (2001) 1.01
Evaluating quality in small-volume hospitals. Arch Intern Med (2008) 0.92
Provider's volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2006) 0.90
Statistical approaches for modeling radiologists' interpretive performance. Acad Radiol (2009) 0.89
Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme. Clin Radiol (2001) 0.85
1998 MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) final rule released. American College of Radiology. Radiol Manage (1998) 0.82
Radiological review of incidence breast cancers. J Med Screen (2000) 0.81
The visibility of cancer on previous mammograms in retrospective review. Clin Radiol (2001) 0.80
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology (2008) 15.86
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin (2008) 12.90
Release from prison--a high risk of death for former inmates. N Engl J Med (2007) 12.46
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin (2007) 12.19
Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med (2014) 11.30
Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med (2009) 10.27
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med (2007) 8.58
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med (2003) 7.73
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med (2012) 7.49
Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2002) 6.51
American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin (2010) 6.45
Changes in the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy after the publication of clinical trial results. Ann Intern Med (2004) 6.42
Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 6.28
Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2003) 6.01
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology (2008) 5.59
American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin (2002) 5.56
Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet (2003) 5.40
Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 5.17
Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology (2011) 5.17
Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med (2005) 5.11
Declines in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a screening mammography population. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 5.08
Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2006) 5.06
Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2005) 4.92
Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med (2008) 4.81
Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England. J Med Screen (2010) 4.72
Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA (2012) 4.71
Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin (2009) 4.71
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology (2006) 4.57
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA (2003) 4.53
Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology (2006) 4.41
Association between acute care and critical illness hospitalization and cognitive function in older adults. JAMA (2010) 4.36
Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.31
Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med (2011) 4.28
Antibiotic use in relation to the risk of breast cancer. JAMA (2004) 4.28
Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 4.07
Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood) (2008) 4.05
Open notes: doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med (2010) 3.99
Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med (2006) 3.95
Protective association of aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology (2003) 3.90
Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 3.83
Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst (2011) 3.62
Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry. Chest (2004) 3.55
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead: patient and physician surveys. Ann Intern Med (2011) 3.55
Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years. J Natl Cancer Inst (2010) 3.53
Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med (2014) 3.46
Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors. Cancer Cell (2007) 3.44
Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 3.41
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology (2005) 3.40
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin (2006) 3.21
American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin (2013) 3.16
A national survey of primary care physicians' methods for screening for fecal occult blood. Ann Intern Med (2005) 3.01
Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association. Circulation (2004) 2.91
Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern? Cancer (2007) 2.91
An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med (2013) 2.89
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology (2009) 2.88
Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures. Stat Med (2004) 2.87
Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.86