The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.

PubWeight™: 1.27‹?› | Rank: Top 10%

🔗 View Article (PMID 21360132)

Published in Gastric Cancer on March 01, 2011

Authors

Sumin Chae1, Anbok Lee, Joo-Ho Lee

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Surgery, Mok-dong Hospital, Ewha Womans University, School of Medicine, 911-1 Mok-dong, Yangcheon-ku, Seoul 158-710, Korea.

Articles citing this

The New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system for adenocarcinoma of the stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy. Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 1.87

Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project. Gastric Cancer (2016) 1.03

Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study. World J Surg Oncol (2015) 0.96

Lymph node ratio is a better prognosticator than lymph node status for gastric cancer: A retrospective study of 138 cases. Oncol Lett (2013) 0.87

Prognostic value of ERCC1 mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and gastric cancer in patients from Southern China. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2014) 0.87

Negative node count improvement prognostic prediction of the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer. PLoS One (2013) 0.82

Incidence, time course and independent risk factors for metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin--a longitudinal experience from a prospectively collected database of 1108 patients. BMC Cancer (2015) 0.81

Prognostic prediction in gastric cancer patients without serosal invasion: comparative study between UICC 7(th) edition and JCGS 13(th) edition N-classification systems. Chin J Cancer Res (2014) 0.80

Evaluation of prognostic factors and survival results in gastric carcinoma: single center experience from Northeast Turkey. Int J Clin Exp Med (2014) 0.79

Seventh tumor-node-metastasis staging of gastric cancer: Five-year follow-up. World J Gastroenterol (2016) 0.77

N staging system: tumor-node-metastasis and future perspectives. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol (2017) 0.75

DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY? Arq Bras Cir Dig (2017) 0.75

Survival in gastric cancer in relation to postoperative adjuvant therapy and determinants. World J Gastroenterol (2015) 0.75

Comparison of the current AJCC-TNM numeric-based with a new anatomical location-based lymph node staging system for gastric cancer: A western experience. PLoS One (2017) 0.75

The IGCA staging system is more accurate than AJCC7 system in stratifying survival of patients with gastric cancer in stage III. BMC Cancer (2017) 0.75

Equipping the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Gastric Cancer with the 15-Node Minimum: a Population-Based Study Using Recursive Partitioning Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg (2017) 0.75

Apparent diffusion coefficient by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a sole biomarker for staging and prognosis of gastric cancer. Chin J Cancer Res (2017) 0.75

Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center. Cancer Med (2017) 0.75

Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in prognosis of gastric cancer: a bi-institutional study from Hungary. Chin J Cancer Res (2017) 0.75

Articles cited by this

Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition - Gastric Cancer (1998) 16.63

Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg (1998) 4.86

Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value. Br J Cancer (2001) 1.88

The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol (2002) 1.80

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer (1998) 1.79

Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer (2000) 1.77

Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 1.49

Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China. Ann Surg Oncol (2010) 1.47

Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer. Ann Surg (2003) 1.37

Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer (1999) 1.27

Time trend analysis of gastric cancer incidence in Japan by histological types, 1975-1989. Br J Cancer (2001) 1.25

Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes: impact on staging and survival of gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol (2007) 1.24

TNM: principles, history, and relation to other prognostic factors. Cancer (2001) 1.14

Significant prognostic factors in patients with early gastric cancer. Int Surg (2001) 1.09

Significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis of 3926 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg (1995) 1.01

The most appropriate category of metastatic lymph nodes to evaluate overall survival of gastric cancer following curative resection. J Surg Oncol (2008) 0.94

[Prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Our experience and review of the literature]. Minerva Chir (2000) 0.85

Impact of the latest TNM classification for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis on 94 D2 gastrectomies. World J Surg (2002) 0.85

The superiority of the new International Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma. Cancer (2000) 0.84

Is lymphadenectomy a predictor or savior for patients with gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol (2010) 0.83

Determining prognostic factors for gastric cancer using the regression tree method. Gastric Cancer (2002) 0.82

Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification. Int Surg (2002) 0.82

Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Eur J Surg Suppl (2003) 0.79

Old and new TNM in carcinoma of the gastric antrum: analysis of our personal experience. J Gastrointest Surg (2003) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer (1998) 1.79

Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg (2016) 1.65

Effects of dexamethasone on the TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Lab Invest (2012) 0.97

Potential prognostic significance of p185(HER2) overexpression with loss of PTEN expression in gastric carcinomas. Tumori (2006) 0.96

Novel application of multicellular layers culture for in situ evaluation of cytotoxicity and penetration of paclitaxel. Cancer Sci (2008) 0.93

Retrospective study of extensive vaccination programs for canine rabies control and public health in Korea. Jpn J Infect Dis (2011) 0.92

Noninfectious virus-like particle antigen for detection of swine vesicular disease virus antibodies in pigs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol (2005) 0.88

Does the Difference of Invasiveness between Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Lead to a Difference in Early Surgical Outcomes? A Prospective Randomized Trial. Ann Surg Oncol (2014) 0.88

The clinical significance of serum cystatin C in critically ill newborns with normal serum creatinine. J Clin Lab Anal (2012) 0.86

Mean platelet volume in Korean patients with hepatic diseases. Platelets (2012) 0.84

Nontraumatic perforation of the bile duct treated with laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A (2005) 0.83

Initial experiences with laparoscopy-assisted and total laparoscopy for anatomical liver resection: a preliminary study. J Korean Med Sci (2006) 0.81

Serum cytokine profiles in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria: a comparison between those who presented with and without hepatic dysfunction. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg (2005) 0.81

Correlation between the molecular subtype of breast cancer and the in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemosensitivity assay. J Korean Surg Soc (2013) 0.78

Intratumoral delivery of paclitaxel using a thermosensitive hydrogel in human tumor xenografts. Arch Pharm Res (2013) 0.77

Acquired hemophilia successfully treated with activated prothrombin complex concentrate and immunosuppressant combination: a case report. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis (2012) 0.77

Induction of apoptosis with diallyl disulfide in AGS gastric cancer cell line. J Korean Surg Soc (2011) 0.76

Overlapping presence of macroamylasemia and hyperamylasemia in acute pancreatitis. Korean J Lab Med (2011) 0.75

Characterization of dephosphocoenzyme A kinase from Streptomyces peucetius ATCC27952, and its application for doxorubicin overproduction. J Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 0.75

Investigations of the Serum Free Light Chain Ratio According to the Updated 2014 IMWG Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Myeloma in Korean Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lab (2017) 0.75

Comparison of clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: A single-institute study. Medicine (Baltimore) (2017) 0.75

Resistance switching characteristics of HfO2 film with electrode for resistance change random access memory. J Nanosci Nanotechnol (2007) 0.75