Published in Surg Endosc on April 13, 2011
Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients. Surg Endosc (2012) 1.01
Personalized surgical management of colorectal cancer in elderly population. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 0.91
Optimizing cost and short-term outcomes for elderly patients in laparoscopic colonic surgery. Surg Endosc (2013) 0.89
Laparoscopic colorectal resection versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy. Tech Coloproctol (2016) 0.89
Laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer produces better short-term outcomes with similar survival outcomes in elderly patients compared to open surgery. Cancer Med (2016) 0.78
Outcomes of elective laparoscopic colorectal operations in octogenarians at a district general hospital in South East England. World J Gastrointest Surg (2013) 0.77
Short-term outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted and open colorectomy for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: A case-matched control study. Mol Clin Oncol (2015) 0.75
Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Octogenarian Patients: Is it Safe? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) (2015) 0.75
Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet (2004) 4.65
Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg (2004) 3.59
Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum (2000) 1.40
Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum (2005) 1.30
Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg (2003) 1.27
Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum (2008) 1.25
Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg (1999) 1.19
Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg (2002) 1.16
Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients. Lancet (1989) 1.14
Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am (2005) 1.13
Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc (2003) 1.04
Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res (2006) 1.01
Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum (1986) 0.99
Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum (2007) 0.95
What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc (2009) 0.92
Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc (2007) 0.84
Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcomes differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg (2005) 0.80
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Biomed (2005) 0.75
General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg (2013) 4.29
Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum (2006) 3.43
A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies. Dis Colon Rectum (2014) 2.40
Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg (2005) 2.33
Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer. Ann Surg (2008) 2.19
The need for standardization of colonoscopic tattooing of colonic lesions. Dis Colon Rectum (2015) 1.99
Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy. J Am Coll Surg (2005) 1.87
Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum (2002) 1.74
Enteric fistulas: principles of management. J Am Coll Surg (2009) 1.71
Determinants of recurrence after sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum (2003) 1.70
Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum (2003) 1.61
Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum (2005) 1.58
Combination treatment with curcumin and quercetin of adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2006) 1.57
Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of rectourethral, rectovaginal, and pouch-vaginal fistulas: results in 53 patients. Ann Surg (2008) 1.56
Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations. Am J Surg (2008) 1.55
High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action. Ann Surg (2015) 1.53
Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: A porcine model. Surg Endosc (2007) 1.51
Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter? Tech Coloproctol (2009) 1.47
Clinical outcomes of surgical resections for primary liver sarcoma in adults: results from a single centre. Eur J Surg Oncol (2004) 1.45
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Surg Endosc (2009) 1.44
Hemorrhoidal disease: A comprehensive review. J Am Coll Surg (2006) 1.42
American College of Surgeons International scholarship programs: 40-year history of support for International Surgical Education. J Am Coll Surg (2010) 1.42
Trends in preparation for colorectal surgery: survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Am Surg (2003) 1.41
Laparoscopic diverticular resection with situs inversus totalis (SIT): report of a case. Surg Innov (2007) 1.38
Gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula. Ann Surg (2003) 1.34
Adhesion prevention and reduction: current status and future recommendations of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Innov (2010) 1.33
Fibrin glue sealing in the treatment of perineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum (2003) 1.33
The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum (2002) 1.30
Retracted Postoperative ileus: a review. Dis Colon Rectum (2004) 1.29
Use of the ON-Q pain management system is associated with decreased postoperative analgesic requirement: double blind randomized placebo pilot study. J Am Coll Surg (2006) 1.29
Interobserver and intraobserver bias exists in the interpretation of anal dysplasia. Dis Colon Rectum (2003) 1.26
Are there predictors of outcome following rectovaginal fistula repair? Dis Colon Rectum (2010) 1.24
Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum (2011) 1.19
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis (2007) 1.15
Horseshoe abscesses and fistulas: how are we doing? Surg Innov (2006) 1.15
Long-term durability of sacral nerve stimulation therapy for chronic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum (2013) 1.12
Minimally invasive procedures for diagnosis of traumatic right diaphragmatic tears: a method for correct diagnosis in selected patients. Am Surg (2007) 1.11
Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc (2002) 1.10
Anal fistula plug: initial experience and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum (2009) 1.09
Racial differences in the anatomical distribution of colorectal cancer: a study of differences between American and Chinese patients. World J Gastroenterol (2003) 1.08
Buschke-Lowenstein tumor successful treatment by surgical excision alone: a case report. Surg Innov (2006) 1.04
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum (2013) 1.03
Failure of evidence-based cancer care in the United States: the association between rectal cancer treatment, cancer center volume, and geography. Ann Surg (2014) 1.02
Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg (2012) 1.02
What every gastroenterologist needs to know about common anorectal disorders. World J Gastroenterol (2009) 1.02
Focus Group on Laparoscopic Colectomy Education as endorsed by The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Dis Colon Rectum (2006) 0.98
Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: to operate or not to operate? Dig Dis (2012) 0.98
Challenges of laparoscopic colectomy in the obese patient: a review. Am J Surg (2006) 0.98
Histologic analysis of the irradiated anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum (2003) 0.96
Muscle transposition: does it still have a role? Clin Colon Rectal Surg (2005) 0.95
Multimedia article. Recurrent postoperative perineal hernia: transperineal redo mesh repair. Dis Colon Rectum (2007) 0.95
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and stercoral ulcers. Gastroenterol Clin North Am (2009) 0.94
What are the outcomes of reoperative restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery? Dis Colon Rectum (2009) 0.94
Idiopathic fistula-in-ano. World J Gastroenterol (2011) 0.93
Strictureplasty. Clin Colon Rectal Surg (2007) 0.93
Does rectal wall tumor eradication with preoperative chemoradiation permit a change in the operative strategy? Dis Colon Rectum (2004) 0.93
Management of ulcerative colitis in the morbidly obese patient: is bariatric surgery indicated? Obes Surg (2006) 0.93
The management of postoperative ileus. Curr Probl Surg (2006) 0.92
Is the quality of life better in patients with colostomy than patients with fecal incontience? World J Surg (2006) 0.92
The effect of colorectal surgery in female sexual function, body image, self-esteem and general health: a prospective study. Ann Surg (2008) 0.92
What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc (2009) 0.92
Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome? Surg Endosc (2009) 0.92
Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg (2010) 0.91
Clinical presentation and surgical outcome in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Surg Innov (2005) 0.91