Digital versus screen film mammography: a clinical comparison.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 3097746)

Published in Biomed Imaging Interv J on October 01, 2008

Authors

Y Faridah1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Articles cited by this

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med (2005) 14.47

Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2007) 14.32

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med (2003) 7.73

Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer (2001) 6.16

Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 2.78

Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med (2008) 1.95

Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology (2002) 1.59

Moving into the digital era: a novel experience with the first full-field digital mammography system in Malaysia. Singapore Med J (2007) 1.49

Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol (2002) 1.35

Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2006) 1.14

Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS. J Am Coll Radiol (2008) 1.03

Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. Eur Radiol (2007) 1.01

Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur Radiol (2007) 1.00

Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2006) 0.86

Highlights from the history of mammography. Radiographics (1990) 0.81