Published in Psychol Res on December 06, 2011
Joint attention for stimuli on the hands: ownership matters. Front Psychol (2015) 0.77
The role of attention in a joint-action effect. PLoS One (2014) 0.76
When your decisions are not (quite) your own: action observation influences free choices. PLoS One (2015) 0.75
Action or attention in social inhibition of return? Psychol Res (2015) 0.75
Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different. Psychol Res (2016) 0.75
Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain (1996) 10.41
Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res (1992) 7.68
Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science (2005) 6.42
Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Curr Biol (2010) 3.39
Reactions toward the source of stimulation. J Exp Psychol (1969) 2.97
Representing others' actions: just like one's own? Cognition (2003) 2.50
Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychol Sci (2002) 2.46
Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q J Exp Psychol A (2000) 2.22
Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1998) 2.17
Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychol Res (2009) 2.12
Impairment of actions chains in autism and its possible role in intention understanding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 2.07
Motion onset captures attention. Psychol Sci (2003) 1.45
Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol (2009) 1.27
Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1997) 1.22
Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2000) 1.14
The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1997) 1.08
The 25th Bartlett Lecture. To act or not to act: perspectives on the representation of actions. Q J Exp Psychol A (1999) 1.08
On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Q J Exp Psychol A (2001) 1.04
Coordinating cognition: the costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition (2007) 1.04
Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neurosci Lett (2005) 0.99
An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return? J Cogn Neurosci (2004) 0.95
A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex (1995) 0.93
Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). Psychol Rev (2010) 0.91
Within- and between-nervous-system inhibition of return: observation is as good as performance. Psychon Bull Rev (2007) 0.90
How we interact with objects: learning from brain lesions. Trends Cogn Sci (2006) 0.88
Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. J Gen Psychol (1999) 0.87
What the experimenter's prime tells the observer's brain. Atten Percept Psychophys (2010) 0.86
The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric. J Cogn Neurosci (2000) 0.86
On observing another person's actions: influences of observed inhibition and errors. Percept Psychophys (2007) 0.85
Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Percept Psychophys (1999) 0.85
The performance and observation of action shape future behaviour. Brain Cogn (2009) 0.85
Social inhibition of return. Acta Psychol (Amst) (2009) 0.85
Is inhibition of return a reflexive effect? Cognition (2005) 0.84
Does Joe influence Fred's action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Res (2008) 0.83
The role of response in spatial attention: direct versus indirect stimulus-response mappings. Vision Res (2002) 0.82
Between-person effects on attention and action: Joe and Fred revisited. Psychol Res (2009) 0.80
Onset of illusory figures attenuates change blindness. Psychon Bull Rev (2007) 0.78
Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2001) 0.76
Change blindness and the primacy of object appearance. Psychon Bull Rev (2006) 0.75
Object and spatial representations in the corner enhancement effect. Percept Psychophys (2007) 0.77
Non-transient luminance changes do not capture attention. Atten Percept Psychophys (2011) 0.76
Are Goal States Represented During Kinematic Imitation? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2017) 0.75