Published in J Endovasc Ther on April 01, 2012
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med (2004) 12.58
Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2003) 1.74
CaRESS: carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol (2004) 1.67
Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria. J Endovasc Ther (2005) 1.53
Costs and cost-effectiveness of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for patients at increased surgical risk: results from the SAPPHIRE trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2011) 1.48
Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness. Biomed Eng Online (2005) 1.38
Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution. J Biomech Eng (2009) 1.27
Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin (2008) 1.26
Semiautomatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Phys (2010) 1.25
Carotid artery revascularization in high-surgical-risk patients using the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EX/EZ: 1-year outcomes in the BEACH Pivotal Group. J Am Coll Cardiol (2008) 1.11
Monocytes mediate metastatic breast tumor cell adhesion to endothelium under flow. FASEB J (2013) 1.10
Blood flow dynamics in saccular aneurysm models of the basilar artery. J Biomech Eng (2006) 1.09
Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. Ann Biomed Eng (2010) 1.08
Angiographic lesion characteristics can predict adverse outcomes after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg (2008) 1.04
A framework for the automatic generation of surface topologies for abdominal aortic aneurysm models. Ann Biomed Eng (2010) 0.97
The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Ann Biomed Eng (2013) 0.95
The effect of material model formulation in the stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng (2009) 0.94
In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther (2007) 0.92
Variability of computational fluid dynamics solutions for pressure and flow in a giant aneurysm: the ASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference CFD Challenge. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.92
Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes. J Vasc Surg (2006) 0.89
Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.89
Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther (2008) 0.88
The importance of patient-specific regionally varying wall thickness in abdominal aortic aneurysm biomechanics. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.87
In vitro performance assessment of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions. J Endovasc Ther (2009) 0.83
Vascular resistance in the carotid artery: an in vitro investigation of embolic protection filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol (2008) 0.80
Abdominal aortic aneurysm: from clinical imaging to realistic replicas. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.80
Feasibility trial of carotid stenting with and without an embolus protection device. J Endovasc Ther (2005) 0.80
Numerical simulation of particle transport and deposition in the pulmonary vasculature. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.79
The Angioguard embolic protection device. Expert Rev Med Devices (2008) 0.79
Surface curvature as a classifier of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparative analysis. Ann Biomed Eng (2012) 0.79
Reproducibility of IVUS border detection for carotid atherosclerotic plaque assessment. Med Eng Phys (2011) 0.78
A pull-back algorithm to determine the unloaded vascular geometry in anisotropic hyperelastic AAA passive mechanics. Ann Biomed Eng (2012) 0.78
Assessing the impact of distal protection filter design characteristics on 30-day outcomes of carotid artery stenting procedures. J Vasc Surg (2012) 0.78
Effects of intraluminal thrombus on patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm hemodynamics via stereoscopic particle image velocity and computational fluid dynamics modeling. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.77
Clinical significance and technical assessment of stent cell geometry in carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther (2009) 0.77
Is carotid stenting justified in the asymptomatic patient? Perspectives on indications for CAS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2007) 0.76
The association of wall mechanics and morphology: a case study of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. J Biomech Eng (2011) 0.76
Stroke intervention: catheter-based therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol (2011) 0.76
Robust infrarenal aortic aneurysm lumen centerline detection for rupture status classification. Med Eng Phys (2013) 0.76
Computational modeling of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther (2010) 0.75
A protocol for measuring pull-off stress of wound-treatment polymers. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.75
A Methodology for the Derivation of Unloaded Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry With Experimental Validation. J Biomech Eng (2016) 0.75
Unanswered issues for carotid stenting in 2003. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2003) 0.75
Carotid artery stenting update. Future Cardiol (2013) 0.75
Use of AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy for acute peripheral ischemia associated with stent fracture. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2007) 0.75
Interventional stroke therapy: current state of the art and needs assessment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (2007) 0.75