Published in Clin Orthop Relat Res on February 01, 2013
The biological response to orthopaedic implants for joint replacement: Part I: Metals. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater (2016) 0.92
Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 0.83
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2016) 0.79
Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options. World J Orthop (2014) 0.77
CORR Insights®: modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 0.75
Letter to the Editor: Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2016) 0.75
Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 0.75
Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review. Int Orthop (2015) 0.75
Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2017) 0.75
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care (1996) 70.87
Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol (1988) 35.68
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1996) 7.44
Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1990) 5.50
Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery. Arthritis Rheum (2003) 2.98
Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1984) 2.77
Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1999) 1.89
Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2002) 1.83
Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2001) 1.54
Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 1.52
Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 1.46
5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty (1997) 1.32
Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.30
A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty (2003) 1.28
Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003) 1.26
Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty (2006) 1.22
Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 1.21
Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1995) 1.18
Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 1.17
A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty (2003) 1.17
Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2010) 1.17
Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 1.17
Fracture of cementless femoral stems at the mid-stem junction in modular revision hip arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011) 1.11
Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty (2002) 1.10
Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem. J Arthroplasty (2008) 1.07
Five- to 10-year results using a noncemented modular revision stem without bone grafting. J Arthroplasty (2008) 1.03
Early outcome of a modular femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.03
Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2009) 0.99
Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons. J Arthroplasty (2007) 0.97
Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation: good short-term results in 125 revisions. J Arthroplasty (2009) 0.96
Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 0.95
Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 0.90
Offering patients the opportunity to choose their hospital for total knee replacement: impact on satisfaction with the surgery. Arthritis Rheum (2005) 0.89
Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 0.87
Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.86
Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects. J Arthroplasty (2005) 0.85
Stress-shielding of the proximal femur using an extensively porous-coated femoral component without allograft in revision surgery: a 5- to 17-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2010) 0.82
A distal fluted, proximal modular femoral prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2009) 0.80
The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2009) 2.83
Giant cell tumor of long bone: a Canadian Sarcoma Group study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2002) 2.60
Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) 2.47
The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 2.11
Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 1.84
Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 1.84
Cementless two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infection after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.77
The natural history of inflammatory pseudotumors in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 1.60
Adverse local tissue reaction associated with a modular hip hemiarthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 1.58
Effect of sociodemographic factors on surgical consultations and hip or knee replacements among patients with osteoarthritis in British Columbia, Canada. J Rheumatol (2010) 1.57
Prevalence of pseudotumor in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011) 1.52
Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 1.48
Evaluating function and health related quality of life in patients treated for extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res (2006) 1.48
High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.38
Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 1.37
Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 1.32
Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 1.30
Two-stage total hip arthroplasty: how often does it control methicillin-resistant infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 1.30
Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2009) 1.25
Classification systems in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2004) 1.24
Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am (2004) 1.24
Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2007) 1.23
Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 1.21
Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 1.17
Removal of solidly fixed implants during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2005) 1.17
Hip prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement for the treatment of infections following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 1.14
Osteoblast-derived factors induce androgen-independent proliferation and expression of prostate-specific antigen in human prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res (2004) 1.13
Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 1.12
The infected total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect (2003) 1.07
Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am (2004) 1.07
The John Charnley Award: Diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus ultrasound for detecting pseudotumors in asymptomatic metal-on-metal THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.05
Predictors of participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 1.03
Trochanteric osteotomies in revision total hip arthroplasty: contemporary techniques and results. Instr Course Lect (2005) 1.03
Quality of life outcomes in revision vs primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.02
To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 1.01
Delays worsen quality of life outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 0.98
Total hip arthroplasty in steroid-induced osteonecrosis: early functional and radiological outcomes. Can J Surg (2013) 0.98
Evaluation of pain in patients with apparently solidly fixed total hip arthroplasty components. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2002) 0.96
Periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 40 years. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.96
Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing. Comput Aided Surg (2006) 0.96
Quality of life outcomes in revision versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.95
Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 0.95