The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

PubWeight™: 0.95‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMC 3679219)

Published in Ann Biomed Eng on March 19, 2013

Authors

Samarth S Raut1, Santanu Chandra, Judy Shum, Ender A Finol

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Articles citing this

Computational neurobiology is a useful tool in translational neurology: the example of ataxia. Front Neurosci (2015) 0.92

The importance of patient-specific regionally varying wall thickness in abdominal aortic aneurysm biomechanics. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.87

Investigation of material modeling in fluid-structure interaction analysis of an idealized three-layered abdominal aorta: aneurysm initiation and fully developed aneurysms. J Biol Phys (2015) 0.83

Imaging of small animal peripheral artery disease models: recent advancements and translational potential. Int J Mol Sci (2015) 0.79

Progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm towards rupture: refining clinical risk assessment using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction method. Ann Biomed Eng (2014) 0.79

Mechanical platelet activation potential in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng (2015) 0.78

Computational Growth and Remodeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Constrained by the Spine. J Biomech Eng (2015) 0.77

A Review of Computational Methods to Predict the Risk of Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Biomed Res Int (2015) 0.75

An approach for patient-specific multi-domain vascular mesh generation featuring spatially varying wall thickness modeling. J Biomech (2015) 0.75

A novel approach for local abdominal aortic aneurysm growth quantification. Med Biol Eng Comput (2016) 0.75

A machine learning approach to investigate the relationship between shape features and numerically predicted risk of ascending aortic aneurysm. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2017) 0.75

Articles cited by this

Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet (2005) 4.59

Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface (2006) 4.35

Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. BMJ (2009) 2.92

The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines. J Vasc Surg (2009) 2.51

Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg (2003) 2.45

Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Ann Surg (1999) 2.27

Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech (2000) 2.07

Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg (2005) 2.03

Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech (2007) 2.02

Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA (2002) 1.99

A theoretical model of enlarging intracranial fusiform aneurysms. J Biomech Eng (2006) 1.97

In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg (2002) 1.92

An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput (2008) 1.84

Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg (2008) 1.73

The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J Biomech (2006) 1.71

Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. J Vasc Surg (2001) 1.70

A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2004) 1.66

Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. J Vasc Surg (1998) 1.66

Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg (2000) 1.64

A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2005) 1.51

Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg (2002) 1.49

Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech (2005) 1.49

Influence of intraluminal thrombus on structural and cellular composition of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Vasc Surg (2003) 1.48

Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng (2004) 1.43

Effect of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. J Vasc Surg (1997) 1.41

Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness. Biomed Eng Online (2005) 1.38

Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. J Vasc Surg (2006) 1.35

Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: Implications for rupture risk. J Vasc Surg (2004) 1.34

Novel aspects of the pathogenesis of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in humans. Cardiovasc Res (2010) 1.33

Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation (1977) 1.31

Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution. J Biomech Eng (2009) 1.27

Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin (2008) 1.26

Semiautomatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Phys (2010) 1.25

Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg (2008) 1.23

Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Med Eng Phys (2001) 1.22

A mathematical model for the growth of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2004) 1.22

A planar biaxial constitutive relation for the luminal layer of intra-luminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech (2006) 1.21

Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: Demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech (2006) 1.20

Circumferential and longitudinal cyclic strain of the human thoracic aorta: age-related changes. J Vasc Surg (2009) 1.19

Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng (2007) 1.19

Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng (2006) 1.17

Growth of thrombus may be a better predictor of rupture than diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2000) 1.15

On parameter estimation for biaxial mechanical behavior of arteries. J Biomech (2009) 1.14

Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the presence of endoluminal thrombus: experimental characterisation and structural static computational analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (1998) 1.13

The effects of anisotropy on the stress analyses of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng (2008) 1.13

Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2010) 1.12

Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy. J Biomech Eng (2008) 1.12

Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models. Biomed Eng Online (2006) 1.12

Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. J Biomech Eng (2009) 1.11

Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion. Angiology (2006) 1.09

A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech (2006) 1.09

Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. Ann Biomed Eng (2010) 1.08

A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction. Ann Biomed Eng (2010) 1.07

Wall stress studies of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a clinical model. Ann Vasc Surg (2001) 1.06

The UK Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: design, methodology and progress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2004) 1.06

The role of geometric parameters in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2009) 1.06

Considerations for reporting finite element analysis studies in biomechanics. J Biomech (2012) 1.05

The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng (1996) 1.04

A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2006) 1.04

Quantification of vessel wall cyclic strain using cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng (2002) 1.03

The mechanical role of thrombus on the growth rate of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg (2009) 1.01

Biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Surg (1993) 1.01

Bleeding into the intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with rupture. J Vasc Surg (2008) 1.01

Reconstruction and finite element mesh generation of abdominal aortic aneurysms from computerized tomography angiography data with minimal user interactions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (2010) 1.00

A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomed Eng Online (2007) 0.99

Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2010) 0.98

New approaches to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment: engineering insights with clinical gain. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2010) 0.98

Evolving mechanical properties of a model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2007) 0.97

Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method. J Biomech (2006) 0.96

Beyond fusiform and saccular: a novel quantitative tortuosity index may help classify aneurysm shape and predict aneurysm rupture potential. Ann Vasc Surg (2007) 0.95

The effect of material model formulation in the stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng (2009) 0.94

Initial stress and nonlinear material behavior in patient-specific AAA wall stress analysis. J Biomech (2009) 0.93

Prestressing in finite deformation abdominal aortic aneurysm simulation. J Biomech (2009) 0.93

Hemodynamic analysis of a compliant femoral artery bifurcation model using a fluid structure interaction framework. Ann Biomed Eng (2008) 0.92

Stress distributions in vascular aneurysms: factors affecting risk of aneurysm rupture. J Surg Res (1993) 0.91

Pathophysiology and pathogenesis of aortic aneurysms. Current concepts. Surg Clin North Am (1989) 0.91

Compressive mechanical properties of the intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms and fibrin-based thrombus mimics. J Biomech (2008) 0.90

Effect of thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall dilation and stress. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) (2003) 0.89

The influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Int Angiol (2009) 0.89

Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.89

Non-invasive determination of zero-pressure geometry of arterial aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng (2006) 0.88

Patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction with fluid structure interaction modeling. Ann Biomed Eng (2010) 0.88

Non-linear viscoelastic behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm thrombus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2007) 0.88

The influence of aorta-aneurysm geometry upon stress in the aneurysm wall. J Surg Res (1987) 0.88

The impact of intraluminal thrombus failure on the mechanical stress in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2011) 0.85

Peak wall stress measurement in elective and acute abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg (2007) 0.84

Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques. J Biomech (2010) 0.83

Comparison of biomechanical failure criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech (2010) 0.80

In vivo velocity vector imaging and time-resolved strain rate measurements in the wall of blood vessels using MRI. J Biomech (2011) 0.80

Diameter of the infrarenal aorta as a risk factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Tromsø Study, 1994-2001. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2009) 0.79

Peak wall stress does not necessarily predict the location of rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2009) 0.79

Use of regional mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms to advance finite element modeling of rupture risk. J Endovasc Ther (2012) 0.79

Improved assessment and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the use of 3D reconstructions as a surgical guidance tool in endovascular repair. Ir J Med Sci (2009) 0.78

Expansion rate of nonaneurysmatic abdominal aorta: over 10 years of follow-up CT studies. Comput Med Imaging Graph (2008) 0.76

Articles by these authors

A comparative analysis of bench-top performance assessment of distal protection filters in transient flow conditions. J Endovasc Ther (2012) 1.38

Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness. Biomed Eng Online (2005) 1.38

Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution. J Biomech Eng (2009) 1.27

Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin (2008) 1.26

Semiautomatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Phys (2010) 1.25

Monocytes mediate metastatic breast tumor cell adhesion to endothelium under flow. FASEB J (2013) 1.10

Blood flow dynamics in saccular aneurysm models of the basilar artery. J Biomech Eng (2006) 1.09

Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. Ann Biomed Eng (2010) 1.08

Ex vivo evidence for the contribution of hemodynamic shear stress abnormalities to the early pathogenesis of calcific bicuspid aortic valve disease. PLoS One (2012) 1.03

A framework for the automatic generation of surface topologies for abdominal aortic aneurysm models. Ann Biomed Eng (2010) 0.97

The effect of material model formulation in the stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng (2009) 0.94

In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther (2007) 0.92

Variability of computational fluid dynamics solutions for pressure and flow in a giant aneurysm: the ASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference CFD Challenge. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.92

A comparative study of reaction times between type II diabetics and non-diabetics. Biomed Eng Online (2005) 0.89

Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.89

The importance of patient-specific regionally varying wall thickness in abdominal aortic aneurysm biomechanics. J Biomech Eng (2013) 0.87

In vitro performance assessment of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions. J Endovasc Ther (2009) 0.83

Vascular resistance in the carotid artery: an in vitro investigation of embolic protection filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol (2008) 0.80

Abdominal aortic aneurysm: from clinical imaging to realistic replicas. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.80

Surface curvature as a classifier of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparative analysis. Ann Biomed Eng (2012) 0.79

Numerical simulation of particle transport and deposition in the pulmonary vasculature. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.79

The Angioguard embolic protection device. Expert Rev Med Devices (2008) 0.79

Assessing the impact of distal protection filter design characteristics on 30-day outcomes of carotid artery stenting procedures. J Vasc Surg (2012) 0.78

Reproducibility of IVUS border detection for carotid atherosclerotic plaque assessment. Med Eng Phys (2011) 0.78

A pull-back algorithm to determine the unloaded vascular geometry in anisotropic hyperelastic AAA passive mechanics. Ann Biomed Eng (2012) 0.78

Effects of intraluminal thrombus on patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm hemodynamics via stereoscopic particle image velocity and computational fluid dynamics modeling. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.77

Clinical significance and technical assessment of stent cell geometry in carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther (2009) 0.77

Robust infrarenal aortic aneurysm lumen centerline detection for rupture status classification. Med Eng Phys (2013) 0.76

The association of wall mechanics and morphology: a case study of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. J Biomech Eng (2011) 0.76

Computational modeling of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther (2010) 0.75

A protocol for measuring pull-off stress of wound-treatment polymers. J Biomech Eng (2014) 0.75

A Methodology for the Derivation of Unloaded Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry With Experimental Validation. J Biomech Eng (2016) 0.75