Published in Audiol Neurootol on December 19, 2013
Clinical evaluation of an image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy. Audiol Neurootol (2014) 1.14
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. Trends Hear (2015) 1.08
Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear (2015) 0.88
Cochlear implant microphone location affects speech recognition in diffuse noise. J Am Acad Audiol (2015) 0.84
Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Trends Hear (2015) 0.82
Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2016) 0.78
A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients. Otol Neurotol (2015) 0.77
Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty. Ear Hear (2017) 0.77
The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing. Ear Hear (2016) 0.75
Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception. J Am Acad Audiol (2015) 0.75
The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality. Trends Hear (2017) 0.75
Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord (1962) 4.35
Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res (1978) 3.24
Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear (2006) 2.46
Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear (2004) 2.23
Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear (2011) 2.13
Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2005) 1.93
Hearing-in-noise benefits after bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation continue to improve 4 years after implantation. Otol Neurotol (2009) 1.87
Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear (2002) 1.78
Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear (2002) 1.76
Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use. Ear Hear (2008) 1.70
Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol Neurotol (2002) 1.55
Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol (2004) 1.54
Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear Hear (2010) 1.53
The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system. Trends Amplif (2006) 1.44
Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol (2002) 1.26
Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant. J Am Acad Audiol (2010) 1.21
Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear (2013) 1.17
Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol (2009) 1.16
Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: a retrospective analysis. Otol Neurotol (2008) 1.13
Optimizing dynamic range in children using the nucleus cochlear implant. Ear Hear (2004) 1.12
Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol (2005) 1.05
Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Ear Hear (2013) 0.99
More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear (2007) 0.97
Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am (1986) 0.93
Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2011) 0.92
Current research with cochlear implants at Arizona State University. J Am Acad Audiol (2012) 0.91
A meta-analytic comparison of binaural benefits between bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. J Am Acad Audiol (2007) 0.89
The effects of changes in head angle on auditory and visual input for omnidirectional and directional microphone hearing aids. Am J Audiol (2003) 0.82
Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit. Acta Otolaryngol (2012) 0.81
Speech performance and sound localization abilities in Neurelec Digisonic® SP binaural cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol (2012) 0.80
THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS. J Hear Sci (2012) 0.80
A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hear (2002) 2.93
Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res (2008) 2.51
Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear (2011) 2.13
Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2004) 2.10
The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res (2005) 2.02
Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2007) 1.83
Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range. Ear Hear (2007) 1.74
Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities. J Rehabil Res Dev (2008) 1.74
Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol (2007) 1.53
Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear Hear (2010) 1.53
Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport (2002) 1.33
Central auditory development in children with cochlear implants: clinical implications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol (2006) 1.27
Cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Brain Res (2008) 1.27
Effects of minimum stimulation settings for the Med El Tempo+ speech processor on speech understanding. Ear Hear (2005) 1.23
Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear (2013) 1.17
Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol (2009) 1.16
Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear (2010) 1.15
Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit. Ear Hear (2013) 1.02
Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). J Speech Lang Hear Res (2007) 1.01
Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 1.01
Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Single-sided Deaf Listeners After Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol (2015) 0.96
Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Ear Hear (2010) 0.96
Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation. Ear Hear (2014) 0.94
Dichotic speech recognition in noise using reduced spectral cues. J Acoust Soc Am (2003) 0.94
Auditory function and speech understanding in listeners who qualify for EAS surgery. Ear Hear (2007) 0.94
The surprising performance of present-day cochlear implants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2007) 0.93
Cochlear implants matching the prosthesis to the brain and facilitating desired plastic changes in brain function. Prog Brain Res (2011) 0.89
Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation. Ear Hear (2012) 0.86
The influence of a sensitive period for auditory-visual integration in children with cochlear implants. Restor Neurol Neurosci (2010) 0.85
Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2008) 0.85
Cochlear implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian. Otol Neurotol (2010) 0.82
Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear (2014) 0.81
Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear (2017) 0.81
THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS. J Hear Sci (2012) 0.80
Sound source localization by hearing preservation patients with and without symmetrical low-frequency acoustic hearing. Audiol Neurootol (2015) 0.79
Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants. J Am Acad Audiol (2011) 0.78
Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN. Otol Neurotol (2016) 0.78
Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2016) 0.78
A phone-assistive device based on Bluetooth technology for cochlear implant users. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng (2003) 0.77
A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients. Otol Neurotol (2015) 0.77
HEARING, PSYCHOPHYSICS, AND COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION: EXPERIENCES OF OLDER INDIVIDUALS WITH MILD SLOPING TO PROFOUND SENSORY HEARING LOSS. J Hear Sci (2012) 0.75
The role of the Utah Artificial Ear project in the development of the modern cochlear implant. Cochlear Implants Int (2015) 0.75