Routine HIV screening in Portugal: clinical impact and cost-effectiveness.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 3867470)

Published in PLoS One on December 18, 2013

Authors

Yazdan Yazdanpanah1, Julian Perelman2, Madeline A DiLorenzo3, Joana Alves2, Henrique Barros4, Céu Mateus2, João Pereira2, Kamal Mansinho5, Marion Robine3, Ji-Eun Park3, Eric L Ross3, Elena Losina6, Rochelle P Walensky7, Farzad Noubary8, Kenneth A Freedberg9, A David Paltiel10

Author Affiliations

1: Hôpital Bichat, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France ; ATIP-Avenir Inserm: "Modélisation, Aide à la Décision, et Coût-Efficacité en Maladies Infectieuses," Inserm U1137, Université Denis Diderot, Paris, France.
2: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
3: Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
4: Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
5: Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.
6: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard Center for AIDS Research, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
7: Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard Center for AIDS Research, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
8: The Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
9: Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Division of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard Center for AIDS Research, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
10: Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Articles cited by this

Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep (2006) 37.28

Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006-2009. PLoS One (2011) 13.03

Sexual transmission of HIV according to viral load and antiretroviral therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS (2009) 11.62

Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet (2008) 11.44

Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness. N Engl J Med (2005) 8.49

Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med (2006) 8.35

Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med (2005) 7.98

The cost effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV disease. N Engl J Med (2001) 5.89

Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death using marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol (2003) 5.81

Safety and efficacy of the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir (MK-0518) in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant virus: a phase II randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2007) 5.65

Cost-effectiveness of HIV treatment in resource-poor settings--the case of Côte d'Ivoire. N Engl J Med (2006) 5.62

Expanded HIV screening in the United States: effect on clinical outcomes, HIV transmission, and costs. Ann Intern Med (2006) 5.53

Atazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failures. AIDS (2005) 4.07

Scaling up antiretroviral therapy in South Africa: the impact of speed on survival. J Infect Dis (2008) 2.96

The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics (2008) 2.84

Are US populations appropriate for trials of human immunodeficiency virus vaccine? The HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study. Am J Epidemiol (2001) 2.69

Use of genotypic resistance testing to guide hiv therapy: clinical impact and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med (2001) 2.47

Test and treat DC: forecasting the impact of a comprehensive HIV strategy in Washington DC. Clin Infect Dis (2010) 2.28

Diagnosed and undiagnosed HIV-infected populations in Europe. HIV Med (2008) 2.26

96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures. AIDS (2006) 1.98

Comparison of health state utilities using community and patient preference weights derived from a survey of patients with HIV/AIDS. Med Decis Making (2002) 1.94

Durable efficacy of enfuvirtide over 48 weeks in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in the T-20 versus optimized background regimen only 1 and 2 clinical trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (2005) 1.87

Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-6. Med Decis Making (2012) 1.81

Model parameter estimation and uncertainty: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--6. Value Health (2012) 1.76

The clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of routine, voluntary HIV screening in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (2011) 1.67

Routine human immunodeficiency virus testing: an economic evaluation of current guidelines. Am J Med (2005) 1.56

Routine HIV screening in France: clinical impact and cost-effectiveness. PLoS One (2010) 1.46

The effect of antiretroviral therapy on secondary transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis (2007) 1.43

Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in India: starting criteria and second-line therapy. AIDS (2007) 1.34

Incidence of primary opportunistic infections in two human immunodeficiency virus-infected French clinical cohorts. Int J Epidemiol (2001) 1.15

Recent HIV-1 infection contributes to the viral diffusion over the French territory with a recent increasing frequency. PLoS One (2012) 1.11

Prevention of human immunodeficiency virus-related opportunistic infections in France: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clin Infect Dis (2002) 1.03

A Monte Carlo simulation of advanced HIV disease: application to prevention of CMV infection. Med Decis Making (1998) 0.99

Spreading of HIV-1 subtype G and envB/gagG recombinant strains among injecting drug users in Lisbon, Portugal. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses (2003) 0.97

Budget impact analysis in economic evaluation: a proposal for a clearer definition. Eur J Health Econ (2011) 0.82

Direct treatment costs of HIV/AIDS in Portugal. Rev Saude Publica (2013) 0.82