A randomized, prospective, intercontinental evaluation of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system: the CENTURY II (Clinical Evaluation of New Terumo Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) trial.

PubWeight™: 1.46‹?› | Rank: Top 5%

🔗 View Article (PMC 4200026)

Published in Eur Heart J on May 19, 2014

Authors

Shigeru Saito1, Mariano Valdes-Chavarri2, Gert Richardt3, Raul Moreno4, Andrés Iniguez Romo5, Emanuele Barbato6, Didier Carrie7, Kenji Ando8, Bela Merkely9, Ran Kornowski10, Hélène Eltchaninoff11, Stefan James12, William Wijns13, CENTURY II Investigators

Author Affiliations

1: Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
2: Hospital Universitaria V. Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
3: Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
4: Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
5: Hospital Meixoeiro Galaria, Vigo, Spain.
6: Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
7: CHU Toulouse Rangeuil, Toulouse, France.
8: Kokura Memorial Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
9: Semmelweis University Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
10: Rabin Medical Centre, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
11: CHU Charles Nicolle Rouen, Rouen, France.
12: Uppsala Akademiska Sjukhus, Uppsala, Sweden.
13: Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, OLV Hospital, Moorselbaan 165, 9301 Aalst, Belgium william.wijns@olvz-aalst.be.

Associated clinical trials:

A Prospective Study, Single-arm, Multicentre, Observational to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Stent Ultimaster Tansei Coronary Stent in Complex Coronary Lesions. (TANSEI) | NCT04475536

Articles cited by this

Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med (2003) 13.29

Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation (2007) 10.31

Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J (2010) 8.85

Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 8.27

Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet (2007) 6.77

Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation (2011) 6.36

Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation (2004) 5.44

Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med (2007) 5.37

Pathological correlates of late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: strut coverage as a marker of endothelialization. Circulation (2007) 5.05

Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med (2007) 4.95

Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA (2012) 4.73

Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation (2007) 4.24

Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med (2010) 3.27

Vascular responses to drug eluting stents: importance of delayed healing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2007) 2.95

Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (2013) 2.81

Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA (2008) 2.59

Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol (2013) 1.89

Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of stent thrombosis at 4 years in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the ISAR-TEST 3, ISAR-TEST 4, and LEADERS randomized trials. Eur Heart J (2012) 1.85

Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med (2010) 1.70

Stent thrombosis redux--the FDA perspective. N Engl J Med (2007) 1.60

A randomised comparison of an everolimus-eluting coronary stent with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent:the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention (2006) 1.46

Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2013) 1.35

Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. J Am Coll Cardiol (2013) 1.23

Robustness of late lumen loss in discriminating drug-eluting stents across variable observational and randomized trials. Circulation (2005) 1.10

Drug-eluting stents show delayed healing: paclitaxel more pronounced than sirolimus. Eur Heart J (2007) 1.10

5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv (2013) 0.98

Balancing efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Ann Intern Med (2007) 0.92

ESC Forum on Drug Eluting Stents European Heart House, Nice, 27-28 September 2007. Eur Heart J (2008) 0.85

Intravascular ultrasound assessment of cobalt chromium versus stainless steel drug-eluting stent expansion. Am J Cardiol (2010) 0.83

Global cardiovascular device innovation: Japan-USA synergies: Harmonization by Doing (HBD) program, a consortium of regulatory agencies, medical device industry, and academic institutions. Circ J (2013) 0.81