A new classification system for pregnancy prognosis of tubal factor infertility.

PubWeight™: 0.78‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMC 4073765)

Published in Int J Clin Exp Med on May 15, 2014

Authors

Shi-En Zou1, Yi Jin1, Yi-Ling Ko1, Jin Zhu1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University Shanghai 200090, China.

Articles cited by this

Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. Fertil Steril (1985) 3.05

Has in-vitro fertilization made salpingostomy obsolete? Br J Obstet Gynaecol (1990) 1.40

The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1999) 1.24

Prediction of pregnancy in infertile women based on the American Society for Reproductive Medicine's revised classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril (1997) 1.09

The importance of periadnexal adhesions in tubal reconstructive surgery for infertility. Fertil Steril (1979) 0.98

Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery. Fertil Steril (1995) 0.97

A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery. Fertil Steril (1986) 0.96

Evolution of the revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril (1985) 0.95

Classification of adnexal adhesions: a proposal and evaluation of its prognostic value. Fertil Steril (1978) 0.92

Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fertil Steril (1986) 0.88

An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol (1991) 0.84

Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol (1991) 0.84

Chance of adhesion formation after laparoscopic salpingo-ovariolysis: is there a place for second-look laparoscopy? J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc (2003) 0.82

Classification of endometriosis. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol (1993) 0.81

Hull and Rutherford classification of infertility. Hum Fertil (Camb) (2002) 0.81

A pelvic scoring system for infertility surgery. Int J Fertil (1989) 0.80

Laparoscopy or laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis. Hum Fertil (Camb) (2007) 0.80

The prognostic role of salpingoscopy in laparoscopic tubal surgery. Hum Reprod (1999) 0.79

[Results of modem tuboperitoneal infertility treatment]. Vojnosanit Pregl (2009) 0.78

Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol (2005) 0.78

Tubal surgery versus assisted reproduction: assessing their role in infertility therapy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (1995) 0.77

Laparoscopic reconstructive tubal surgery in a tertiary referral centre--a review of 177 cases. S Afr Med J (2000) 0.77

The predictive value of the "Hull & Rutherford" classification for tubal damage. BJOG (2004) 0.77