Published in Trends Pharmacol Sci on August 01, 2014
Journals invite too few women to referee. Nature (2017) 4.60
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2015) 2.98
Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014). BMJ (2016) 2.88
Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference? Acad Med (2016) 1.19
Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc (2015) 0.87
Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review. PLoS One (2017) 0.75
Tenure Track Policy Increases Representation of Women in Senior Academic Positions, but Is Insufficient to Achieve Gender Balance. PLoS One (2016) 0.75
Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities. PLoS One (2016) 0.75
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 12.93
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature (1997) 11.29
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev (2002) 5.73
Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS One (2006) 4.44
Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs. Acad Med (2011) 3.30
Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 3.04
Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychol Bull (2003) 2.96
Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science (2008) 2.66
Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review. Acad Med (2009) 1.56
Promoting Institutional Change Through Bias Literacy. J Divers High Educ (2012) 1.45
A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution. Acad Med (2015) 1.32