Published in Am J Bioeth on October 01, 2015
Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards. A prototype instrument. Arch Neurol (1995) 4.58
What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research? Neurology (2005) 2.58
Older adults' attitudes toward enrollment of non-competent subjects participating in Alzheimer's research. Am J Psychiatry (2008) 2.37
The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives. Behav Sci Law (2006) 2.37
Is It Ethical to Enroll Cognitively Impaired Adults in Research That Is More Than Minimal Risk With No Prospect of Benefit? Am J Bioeth (2015) 2.07
Views of potential subjects toward proposed regulations for clinical research with adults unable to consent. Am J Psychiatry (2002) 1.55
Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans. Neurology (2009) 1.44
Preservation of the capacity to appoint a proxy decision maker: implications for dementia research. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2011) 1.41
Impaired decision-making ability in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and willingness to participate in research. Am J Psychiatry (2002) 1.29
Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research. Alzheimers Dement (2010) 1.14
Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research. Neurology (2011) 1.04
How important is 'accuracy' of surrogate decision-making for research participation? PLoS One (2013) 0.87
Toward revising the ethical boundaries of research with noncompetent subjects. Am J Psychiatry (2009) 0.86
Bioethicists Can and Should Contribute to Addressing Racism. Am J Bioeth (2016) 7.07
Justice and nontherapeutic pediatric research. Am J Bioeth (2014) 0.75