Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 26552756)

Published in Heart on November 09, 2015

Authors

Ruben L Osnabrugge1, Elizabeth A Magnuson2, Patrick W Serruys3, Carlos M Campos4, Kaijun Wang2, David van Klaveren5, Vasim Farooq3, Mouin S Abdallah2, Haiyan Li2, Katherine A Vilain2, Ewout W Steyerberg5, Marie-Claude Morice6, Keith D Dawkins7, Friedrich W Mohr8, A Pieter Kappetein9, David J Cohen2, SYNTAX trial investigators

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Cardiovascular Research, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
2: Department of Cardiovascular Research, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
3: Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
4: Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
5: Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
6: Department of Interventional Cardiology, Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France.
7: Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
8: Department of Cardiac Surgery, Herzzentrum Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
9: Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Associated clinical trials:

SYNTAX Study: TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narrowed Arteries (SYNTAX) | NCT00114972