Published in Am J Bioeth on January 01, 2016
Religion and Newborn Screening. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
Putting Children at Risk in the Name of Religion. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
One Exemption Too Many: The Case for Mandated CCHD Screening. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
An Accessibility Constraint on Parental Refusal of Critical Newborn Screening. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
Why Only Inform the Dissenters? Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
Parents Do Not Always Have to Get Their Way: Why Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening for Newborns Should Be Mandatory. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
The Pediatrician's Dilemma: Respecting Parental Autonomy Versus Protecting Vulnerable Children. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
Use of a Balanced Test to Resolve Competing Best Interest and Liberty Claims When Parents Refuse Consent for Neonatal Pulse Oximetry. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
Letting Parents Say "No:" A Small Price to Pay for State-Mandated Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD) Screening. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
Pulse Oximetry Should Be Required Without a Religious Exemption. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75
Parental Refusal of Newborn Screening for Congenital Hearing Loss. Am J Bioeth (2016) 0.75