PubRank

Body Position May Influence Oronasal CPAP Effectiveness to Treat OSA.

PubWeight™: 0.75‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 26888589)

Published in J Clin Sleep Med on March 15, 2015

Authors

Juliana Araújo Nascimento1,2, Tômas de Santana Carvalho1,2, Henrique Takachi Moriya3, Paulo Henrique Sousa Fernandes2, Rafaela Garcia Santos de Andrade2, Pedro Rodrigues Genta2, Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho2, Naomi Kondo Nakagawa1,2

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Physiotherapy, Communication Science and Disorders and Occupational Therapy, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
2: Sleep Laboratory, Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
3: Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Telecommunication and Control Engineering Department, Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

Articles cited by this ↗

Oral-nasal continuous positive airway pressure as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest (1994) 2.07

Nasal ventilation is more effective than combined oral-nasal ventilation during induction of general anesthesia in adult subjects. Anesthesiology (2008) 1.64

Lateral position decreases collapsibility of the passive pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology (2002) 1.57

Type of mask may impact on continuous positive airway pressure adherence in apneic patients. PLoS One (2013) 1.15

CPAP therapy via oronasal mask for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest (1994) 1.00

Higher effective oronasal versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea: effect of mandibular stabilization. Can Respir J (2014) 0.95