The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures.

PubWeight™: 0.81‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 26966520)

Published in United European Gastroenterol J on December 17, 2015

Authors

Matthew D Rutter1, Carlo Senore2, Raf Bisschops3, Dirk Domagk4, Roland Valori5, Michal F Kaminski6, Cristiano Spada7, Michael Bretthauer8, Cathy Bennett9, Cristina Bellisario2, Silvia Minozzi2, Cesare Hassan10, Colin Rees11, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro12, Tomas Hucl13, Thierry Ponchon14, Lars Aabakken15, Paul Fockens16

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK; School of Medicine, Durham University, UK.
2: CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
3: Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
4: Department of Medicine I, Josephs-Hospital Warendorf, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Münster, Warendorf, Germany.
5: Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
6: Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, and Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
7: Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
8: Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
9: Centre for Technology Enabled Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
10: Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
11: Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK.
12: Servicio de Gastroenterologia, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal.
13: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
14: Department. of Digestive Diseases, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
15: Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
16: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles cited by this

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14

Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med (2003) 16.97

Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med (2003) 15.53

Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med (2008) 15.51

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med (2011) 15.02

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2007) 13.46

Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess (1998) 11.56

Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med (2006) 10.52

The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club (1995) 8.57

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99

Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med (2011) 6.50

Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst (2009) 6.21

Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.03

Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med (2004) 4.95

Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet (2005) 4.65

Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 4.62

Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology (2012) 4.13

The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology (2010) 3.87

Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 3.30

Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol (2010) 2.97

Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2008) 2.91

Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy (2007) 2.88

Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty. J Clin Oncol (2012) 2.77

Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 2.63

Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut (2013) 2.50

Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ (2008) 2.15

Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut (2006) 1.95

The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut (2012) 1.93

A cohort study of missed and new cancers after esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2010) 1.91

How to read a paper. Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ (1997) 1.83

Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut (2006) 1.61

Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology (2004) 1.55

Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 1.42

Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 1.30

Missed diagnoses in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers. Endoscopy (2004) 1.22

Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 1.06

Nationwide, population-based data from 11,074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc (2010) 1.03

Polypoid colonic lesions undetected by endoscopy. Radiology (1978) 1.02

Are low-volume ERCPists a problem in the United States? A plea to examine and improve ERCP practice-NOW. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.01

Are we meeting the standards set for ERCP? Gut (2007) 0.95

Achieving high quality colonoscopy: using graphical representation to measure performance and reset standards. Colorectal Dis (2012) 0.87

Quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy (2014) 0.79

Articles by these authors

ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and the COVID-19 pandemic. Endoscopy (2020) 3.93

An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut (2014) 3.46

Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy (2014) 2.36

EUS-guided fiducial markers placement with a 22-gauge needle for image-guided radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 2.17

Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy (2015) 1.84

Endoscopic closure of acute perforations of the GI tract: a systematic review of the literature. Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 1.77

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy (2015) 1.73

Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy (2016) 1.26

The new PillCam Colon capsule: difficult colonoscopy? No longer a problem? Gastrointest Endosc (2008) 1.20

Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut (2015) 1.16

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. Endoscopy (2015) 1.08

Colon capsule versus CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy: a prospective, comparative trial. Gut (2014) 1.06

Video capsule endoscopy in patients with known or suspected small bowel stricture previously tested with the dissolving patency capsule. J Clin Gastroenterol (2007) 0.98

Video capsule endoscopy in small-bowel tumours: a single centre experience. Scand J Gastroenterol (2008) 0.95

Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy (2016) 0.94

Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Endoscopy (2014) 0.92

Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Eur Radiol (2015) 0.92

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Establishing the key unanswered research questions within gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy (2016) 0.91

Isotretinoin-associated pan-enteritis. J Clin Gastroenterol (2008) 0.86

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy (2017) 0.86

Giant arteriovenous malformation of the colon mimicking lipoma. Dig Liver Dis (2013) 0.82

Small bowel cleansing for capsule endoscopy in paediatric patients: a prospective randomized single-blind study. Dig Liver Dis (2013) 0.81

Linking estrogen receptor β expression with inflammatory bowel disease activity. Oncotarget (2015) 0.79

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J (2017) 0.78

Advanced endoscopic imaging: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technology Review. Endoscopy (2016) 0.76

Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J (2016) 0.76

An unusual colonic "tumour". Dig Liver Dis (2014) 0.76

Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statement. United European Gastroenterol J (2016) 0.76

Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc (2017) 0.76

Usefulness of virtual chromoendoscopy in the evaluation of subtle small bowel ulcerative lesions by endoscopists with no experience in videocapsule. Endosc Int Open (2016) 0.75

Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement for reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy (2016) 0.75

Real-time diagnosis of H. pylori infection during endoscopy: Accuracy of an innovative tool (EndoFaster). United European Gastroenterol J (2015) 0.75

Higher adenoma recurrence rate after left- versus right-sided colectomy for colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc (2015) 0.75

Teaching and learning on the ward round. Frontline Gastroenterol (2012) 0.75

Hyperthermia adds to trabectedin effectiveness and thermal enhancement is associated with BRCA2 degradation and impairment of DNA homologous recombination repair. Int J Cancer (2016) 0.75

Clinical outcomes and prevalence of cancer in patients with possible groove pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016) 0.75

Why attempt en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas? A systematic review of the prevalence of superficial submucosal invasive cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut (2017) 0.75