Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios.

PubWeight™: 66.58‹?› | Rank: Top 0.01% | All-Time Top 1000

🔗 View Article (PMID 28078226)

Published in Transl Androl Urol on December 01, 2016

Authors

Ashok Agarwal1, Ahmad Majzoub2, Sandro C Esteves3, Edmund Ko4, Ranjith Ramasamy5, Armand Zini6

Author Affiliations

1: American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
2: Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
3: ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Referral Center for Male Reproduction, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
4: Department of Urology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
5: Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
6: Department of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Articles citing this

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: when and why?: Practice Recommendations of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing: Expert Commentaries by Invited Authors and Replies by Guest Editors Contributors from South America. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

A perspective on sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in different clinical scenarios of male reproductive abnormalities and its influence in natural and assisted reproduction. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Evaluation of sperm chromatin structure and DNA strand breaks is an important part of clinical male fertility assessment. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Implications of ejaculatory sperm DNA fragmentation on male infertility management. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Assessing the male in fertility clinics-men undervalued, undermanaged and undertreated. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Eight tests for sperm DNA fragmentation and their roles in the clinic. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Sperm DNA fragmentation: indication and uses. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Is sperm DNA fragmentation testing ready for prime time? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: ready for prime time? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Clinical implication of DNA fragmentation in male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.40

Clinical scenarios of unexplained sperm DNA fragmentation and their management. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss and sperm DNA fragmentation, have we found the missing link? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

The quest of finding the perfect spermatozoon. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Using sperm testing to improve patient and offspring health: rational, evidence-based care of the infertile male in the ART clinic. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Commentary on sperm DNA fragmentation testing clinical guideline. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Commentary on clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Practice Recommendations of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing: Expert Commentaries by Invited Authors and Replies by Guest Editors Contributors from North America. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: a requisite to infertility practice. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: article overview: Practice Recommendations of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing: Expert Commentaries by Invited Authors and Replies by Guest Editors Contributors from Europe. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Evidence based sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Sperm DNA fragmentation: the evolution of guidelines for patient testing and management. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing as a diagnostic and prognostic parameter of couple infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

The role for sperm DNA damage testing in 2017. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Pros and cons of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: weighing the evidence. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: a commentary. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

A guide to sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Should sperm DNA fragmentation testing be routinely used in assessing male infertility? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Practical applications of sperm DNA fragmentation testing and its role in infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Testing of sperm DNA damage and clinical recommendations. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility work-up: are we ready? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Routine assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation in clinical practice: commentary and perspective. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: proceed with care. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Recognizing sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical evaluation of male fertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Frontiers in sperm function testing: DNA fragmentation analysis shows promise. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Clinical usefulness of sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

A few more fragments: putting sperm DNA integrity testing into clinical practice. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Is the sperm DNA status the best predictor of both natural and assisted conception? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Sperm DNA integrity testing: a valuable addition to the tool box of infertility clinicians. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Practical considerations for DNA fragmentation testing in the management of male fertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Utility of testing sperm DNA fragmentation: an all-in-one diagnostic tool to address a multi-pronged clinical problem. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.39

Sperm DNA damage diagnostics: when and why. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Evaluation of sperm DNA structure, fragmentation and decondensation: an essential tool in the assessment of male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

DNA fragmentation and the ultimate success of a pregnancy. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Application of sperm DNA fragmentation test in clinical setting. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Finding the fit: sperm DNA integrity testing for male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Is testing of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) ready for the basic work-up of male infertility? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Use of sperm DNA fragmentation test in ART setting: is it a promising diagnostic test? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Clinical use of sperm DNA fragmentation analysis results, a practical example of how to deal with too much information from the literature in reproductive medicine. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

The role of sperm DNA testing on male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Commentary: sperm DNA fragmentation testing in action. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.38

Some relevant points on sperm DNA fragmentation tests. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 1.37

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: where we stand in 2017. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Commentary: the value of testing sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health (2017) 0.75

Measure of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF): how, why and when? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing-clinical utility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Guidelines on sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Articles cited by this

(truncated to the top 100)

A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res (1988) 17.88

World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update (2009) 7.71

Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertil Steril (2003) 3.27

Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod (1991) 2.98

Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril (1970) 2.88

Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod (1999) 2.79

Testicular spermatozoa have statistically significantly lower DNA damage compared with ejaculated spermatozoa in patients with unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment. Fertil Steril (2008) 2.54

Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update (2003) 2.47

The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod (2012) 2.46

Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod (2004) 2.42

Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod (2006) 2.36

Episodic air pollution is associated with increased DNA fragmentation in human sperm without other changes in semen quality. Hum Reprod (2005) 2.33

Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril (2010) 2.31

Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Fertil Steril (2000) 2.30

Recurrent pregnancy loss: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy. Rev Obstet Gynecol (2009) 2.20

The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl (2003) 2.16

Body mass index in relation to semen quality, sperm DNA integrity, and serum reproductive hormone levels among men attending an infertility clinic. Fertil Steril (2009) 2.16

Clinical significance of sperm DNA damage in assisted reproduction outcome. Hum Reprod (2010) 2.13

Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Androl (2002) 2.07

Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril (2014) 2.07

Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2008) 2.06

DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl (2000) 2.06

Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod (1997) 2.02

Shorter abstinence decreases sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in ejaculate. Fertil Steril (2011) 1.99

Impact of body mass index values on sperm quantity and quality. J Androl (2005) 1.99

The effect of obesity on sperm disorders and male infertility. Nat Rev Urol (2010) 1.99

Characterization of subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation: implications in the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Hum Reprod (2001) 1.97

Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol (2013) 1.93

Oxidative stress & male infertility. Indian J Med Res (2009) 1.93

Relationship between ROS production, apoptosis and DNA denaturation in spermatozoa from patients examined for infertility. Hum Reprod (2004) 1.93

The role of free radicals and antioxidants in reproduction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (2006) 1.89

Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor-quality semen samples and correlates with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril (1998) 1.89

Relationship between sperm aneuploidy, sperm DNA integrity, chromatin packaging, traditional semen parameters, and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril (2015) 1.89

Comparison of reproductive outcome in oligozoospermic men with high sperm DNA fragmentation undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm. Fertil Steril (2015) 1.88

Are tests of sperm DNA damage clinically useful? Pros and cons. J Androl (2008) 1.87

Abstinence Time and Its Impact on Basic and Advanced Semen Parameters. Urology (2016) 1.86

Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update (2001) 1.83

Evaluation of nuclear DNA damage in spermatozoa from infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril (2003) 1.79

[Laboratory manual of the WHO for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction]. Ann Ist Super Sanita (2001) 1.76

Effectiveness and treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril (2006) 1.74

Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm. J Androl (2006) 1.74

Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril (2007) 1.73

Sperm chromatin structure and male fertility: biological and clinical aspects. Asian J Androl (2006) 1.71

Nature of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa and the possible involvement of apoptosis. Biol Reprod (2002) 1.70

Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns. Hum Reprod (2010) 1.67

Effects of male age on the frequencies of germinal and heritable chromosomal abnormalities in humans and rodents. Fertil Steril (2004) 1.66

Negative effects of increased sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men with idiopathic and male factor infertility. Fertil Steril (2003) 1.66

Oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in male infertility: a clinical approach. BJU Int (2005) 1.65

Are varicoceles associated with increased deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation? Fertil Steril (2011) 1.64

Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Fertil Steril (2007) 1.64

Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod (2002) 1.60

Aneuploidy in human sperm: a review of the frequency and distribution of aneuploidy, effects of donor age and lifestyle factors. Cytogenet Cell Genet (2000) 1.59

Meta-analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod Biomed Online (2006) 1.59

Are sperm chromatin and DNA defects relevant in the clinic? Syst Biol Reprod Med (2011) 1.58

Individuality of DNA denaturation patterns in human sperm as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod Toxicol (1991) 1.57

Cigarette smoking and reproductive function. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (2008) 1.56

Thermal denaturation of DNA in situ as studied by acridine orange staining and automated cytofluorometry. Exp Cell Res (1975) 1.55

Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to chromomycin A3 accessibility. Biol Reprod (1995) 1.53

Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele-associated male infertility: part 1. Nat Rev Urol (2012) 1.52

Evaluation of nuclear DNA damage in human spermatozoa in men opting for assisted reproduction. Indian J Med Res (2008) 1.52

Present concept of unexplained infertility. Gynecol Endocrinol (2004) 1.50

Correlation between sperm motility and sperm chromatin structure assay parameters. Fertil Steril (2003) 1.49

Comparative study of cytochemical tests for sperm chromatin integrity. J Androl (2001) 1.49

Sperm DNA integrity assays: diagnostic and prognostic challenges and implications in management of infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet (2011) 1.49

Relationship between oxidative stress, varicocele and infertility: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online (2006) 1.49

Impact of body mass index on seminal oxidative stress. Andrologia (2010) 1.48

Aniline blue staining as a marker of sperm chromatin defects associated with different semen characteristics discriminates between proven fertile and suspected infertile men. Int J Androl (1990) 1.46

Insight into oxidative stress in varicocele-associated male infertility: part 2. Nat Rev Urol (2012) 1.46

The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online (2013) 1.45

Unexplained male infertility: diagnosis and management. Int Braz J Urol (2012) 1.45

Linear increase of structural and numerical chromosome 9 abnormalities in human sperm regarding age. Eur J Hum Genet (2003) 1.45

Organophosphorous pesticide exposure alters sperm chromatin structure in Mexican agricultural workers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol (2004) 1.44

Clinical significance of reactive oxygen species in semen of infertile Indian men. Andrologia (2009) 1.44

Relationship between varicocele and sperm DNA damage and the effect of varicocele repair: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online (2012) 1.43

Male obesity and age in relationship to semen parameters and sperm chromatin integrity. Andrologia (2011) 1.42

Antioxidants and sperm DNA damage: a clinical perspective. J Assist Reprod Genet (2009) 1.42

The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on live birth rate after IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online (2014) 1.42

Reproductive toxicity of lead, cadmium, and phthalate exposure in men. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int (2014) 1.42

Antioxidant levels in blood and seminal plasma and their impact on sperm parameters in infertile men. Indian J Biochem Biophys (2010) 1.40

Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. Int Braz J Urol (2014) 1.40

Value of sperm chromatin dispersion test in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet (2011) 1.38

The TUNEL assay consistently underestimates DNA damage in human spermatozoa and is influenced by DNA compaction and cell vitality: development of an improved methodology. Int J Androl (2011) 1.37

Association between sperm cell chromatin condensation, morphology based on strict criteria, and fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates in an IVF program. Andrologia (1998) 1.37

Adverse effects of cadmium exposure on mouse sperm. Reprod Toxicol (2009) 1.36

The applicability of the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay in epidemiological studies. Asclepios. Hum Reprod (1998) 1.36

Variations in the structural character and stability of the nuclear chromatin in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil (1973) 1.36

Obesity leads to higher risk of sperm DNA damage in infertile patients. Asian J Androl (2013) 1.34

Bisphenol-A affects male fertility via fertility-related proteins in spermatozoa. Sci Rep (2015) 1.34

Diagnostic accuracy of sperm chromatin dispersion test to evaluate sperm deoxyribonucleic acid damage in men with unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril (2013) 1.34

Decreased sperm DNA fragmentation after surgical varicocelectomy is associated with increased pregnancy rate. J Urol (2013) 1.33

Histological findings in testes with varicocele during childhood and their therapeutic consequences. Eur J Pediatr (1980) 1.33

Sperm chromatin condensation in infertile men with varicocele before and after surgical repair. Fertil Steril (2011) 1.32

Normal sperm morphology and chromatin packaging: comparison between aniline blue and chromomycin A3 staining. Andrologia (1999) 1.31

The relationship between sperm viability and DNA fragmentation rates. Reprod Biol Endocrinol (2015) 1.31

Diagnostic accuracy of sperm DNA degradation index (DDSi) as a potential noninvasive biomarker to identify men with varicocele-associated infertility. Int Urol Nephrol (2015) 1.30

A translational medicine appraisal of specialized andrology testing in unexplained male infertility. Int Urol Nephrol (2014) 1.30

Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril (2015) 1.30

Effects of reactive oxygen species on sperm function. Theriogenology (2012) 1.30

Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications. Hum Reprod (2006) 1.29

Sperm head defects and disturbances in spermatozoal chromatin and DNA integrities in idiopathic infertile subjects: association with cigarette smoking. Clin Biochem (2008) 1.29

Articles by these authors

Cigarette Smoking and Semen Quality: A New Meta-analysis Examining the Effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory Methods for the Examination of Human Semen. Eur Urol (2016) 1.21

Reply to Eugenio Ventimiglia, Montorsi Francesco, and Andrea Salonia's Letter to the Editor re: Reecha Sharma, Avi Harlev, Ashok Agarwal, Sandro C. Esteves. Cigarette Smoking and Semen Quality: A New Meta-analysis Examining the Effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory Methods for the Examination of Human Semen. Eur Urol 2016;70:635-45. Eur Urol (2016) 1.21

Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl (2016) 0.94

Smoking and Male Infertility: An Evidence-Based Review. World J Mens Health (2015) 0.84

Proteomic signatures of infertile men with clinical varicocele and their validation studies reveal mitochondrial dysfunction leading to infertility. Asian J Androl (2016) 0.79

Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Int J Reprod Med (2017) 0.75

The missing piece in management of infertile couple-clinical andrology. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in patients with subclinical varicocele: is there any evidence? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

The importance of quality control and quality assurance in SDF testing. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Reactive oxygen species and sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

It is high time for clinical application of sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Risk factors associated with sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Epididymal contribution to male infertility: An overlooked problem. Andrologia (2020) 0.75

The debate on sperm DNA fragmentation test goes on. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Restoration of fertility potential via targeted treatment approach. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Future direction in sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation in clinical practice. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation test results reflect the overall quality of the whole semen specimen. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation for the evaluation of male infertility: clinical algorithms. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Development of treatment strategies in men with vulnerable sperm. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

An evidence-based perspective on the role of sperm chromatin integrity and sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

All-round approach in diagnosis. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Comparison of strategies to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation in couples undergoing ICSI. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Current limitation and future perspective of sperm DNA fragmentation tests. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Insights on the predictive accuracy of the sperm DNA fragmentation tests on male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: concise practice recommendations. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation: laboratory and clinical aspects. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Call for wider application of sperm DNA fragmentation test. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Frontiers in clinical andrology. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Technical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation testing, methods to select sperm with low DNA fragmentation, and usefulness of redox potential measurement in male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

An update on the techniques used to measure oxidative stress in seminal plasma. Andrologia (2020) 0.75

Development of targeted therapeutic strategies and refinement of sperm DNA fragmentation testing. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Use of sperm DNA fragmentation testing and testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

The price and value of sperm DNA fragmentation tests. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Expanding our understanding of clinical laboratory testing in male infertility patients. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Elucidating the clinical indications of sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation: a key player in decision making. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Understanding sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation: overcoming standardization obstacles. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Further evidence supports the clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility workup and assisted reproductive technology. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

The correct interpretation of sperm DNA fragmentation test. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Integrating surgical and clinical andrology is essential to improve the quality of care delivered to infertile couples. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Role of diagnostic intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the management of genetically determined zona pellucida-free oocytes during fertilization: a case report. Zygote (2020) 0.75

The complex nature of the sperm DNA damage process. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Despite limitations, sperm DNA fragmentation testing provides unique information complementary to but distinct from semen analysis results. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

A single cut-off value of sperm DNA fragmentation testing does not fit all. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

One of the many missing links between infertility and sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing reveals the overall quality of a semen sample. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

The role of female factors in the management of sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing is the safe and economical way to go. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation: a rationale for its clinical utility. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Unraveling the utility and limitations of clinical practice guidelines. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

The problem of mixing 'apples and oranges' in meta-analytic studies. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Drawbacks of the current practice. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Implication of sperm processing during assisted reproduction on sperm DNA integrity. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

From bench to clinic. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Antioxidants for elevated sperm DNA fragmentation: a mini review. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Expanding treatment paradigm of high sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Is National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline a nice guideline? Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

More good than harm should be expected when Testi-ICSI is applied to oligozoospermic men with post-testicular sperm DNA fragmentation. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

A Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis on the clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in specific male infertility scenarios. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: a cross sectional survey on current practices of fertility specialists. Transl Androl Urol (2017) 0.75