A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes.

PubWeight™: 3.86^‹?› | Rank: Top 1%

🔗 View Article (PMID 31701521)

Published in Anaesthesia on November 08, 2019

Authors

J M Mouritsen¹, L Ehlers², J Kovaleva³, I Ahmad⁴^,5, K El-Boghdadly⁴^,5

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
2: Danish Center of Healthcare Improvements, Institute of Business and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
3: Sint-Jozefkliniek Bornem and Willebroek, Bornem, Belgium.
4: Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
5: King's College London, UK.

Articles citing this ↘

Should we be switching from reusable bronchoscopes to disposable due to the risks of cross-contamination? Anaesthesia (2020) 1.39

Cost analysis of single vs. reusable flexible optical bronchoscopes. Anaesthesia (2020) 0.75

Cost analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes: a reply. Anaesthesia (2020) 0.75

Is there 'scope' for both single use and re-usable systems? Anaesthesia (2020) 0.75

Articles by these authors ⇆

Cost analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes: a reply. Anaesthesia (2020) 0.75