PubRank
Search
About
Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE (J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics)
Journal PubWeight™ 287.49
‹?›
Top papers
Rank
Title
Year
PubWeight™
‹?›
1
Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.
2010
3.29
2
Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.
2006
3.25
3
Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.
2006
2.71
4
The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research partnership: points to consider.
2010
2.40
5
Research ethics education for community-engaged research: a review and research agenda.
2012
2.35
6
A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn.
2011
2.03
7
Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.
2007
2.02
8
Personality and ethical decision-making in research: the role of perceptions of self and others.
2007
1.89
9
Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: a research ethics framework.
2010
1.72
10
Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.
2011
1.72
11
Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.
2009
1.67
12
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
2006
1.63
13
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a national survey of professionals involved in human subjects protection.
2010
1.59
14
Reported goals of instructors of responsible conduct of research for teaching of skills.
2013
1.56
15
Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research.
2010
1.55
16
Informed consent in international health research.
2006
1.46
17
What scientists want from their research ethics committee.
2006
1.40
18
The biomedical ethics ontology proposal: excellent aims, questionable methods.
2009
1.39
19
Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies.
2009
1.36
20
Increasing research literacy in minority communities: CARES fellows training program.
2010
1.35
21
Impact of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate to biobanks: an experimental survey.
2014
1.33
22
Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.
2011
1.30
23
Survey of u.s. Human research protection organizations: workload and membership.
2008
1.26
24
Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts.
2013
1.26
25
Women's Autonomy and Informed Consent in Microbicides Clinical Trials.
2006
1.24
26
Returning individual research results: development of a cancer genetics education and risk communication protocol.
2010
1.22
27
Questioning the Need for Informed Consent: A Case Study of California's Experience with a Pilot Newborn Screening Research Project.
2007
1.17
28
A needs assessment to build international research ethics capacity.
2006
1.16
29
Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research.
2010
1.16
30
Developing community partner training: regulations and relationships.
2011
1.16
31
Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials.
2007
1.15
32
Misbehaviors of front-line research personnel and the integrity of community-based research.
2011
1.14
33
IRB Chairs' Perspectives on Genomics Research Involving Stored Biological Materials: Ethical Concerns and Proposed Solutions.
2008
1.14
34
Faculty perspectives on community-based research: "I see this still as a journey".
2009
1.13
35
Cognitive interviewing as a tool for improving the informed consent process.
2006
1.12
36
Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers".
2011
1.12
37
Pediatric assent for a study of antiretroviral therapy dosing for children in Western Kenya: a case study in international research collaboration.
2009
1.10
38
Developing a participatory Aboriginal health research project: "Only if it's going to mean something".
2008
1.09
39
Research with Aboriginal peoples: authentic relationships as a precursor to ethical research.
2010
1.09
40
Purpose and benefits of early phase cancer trials: what do oncologists say? What do patients hear?
2008
1.08
41
Nine key functions for a human subjects protection program for community-engaged research: points to consider.
2010
1.08
42
Creating a controlled vocabulary for the ethics of human research: towards a biomedical ethics ontology.
2009
1.08
43
Do incentives exert undue influence on survey participation? Experimental evidence.
2008
1.07
44
Research Ethics Review and Aboriginal Community Values: Can the Two be Reconciled?
2007
1.07
45
The ethics of paying drug users who participate in research: a review and practical recommendations.
2006
1.07
46
Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons.
2010
1.07
47
Measuring coercion to participate in research within a doubly vulnerable population: initial development of the coercion assessment scale.
2010
1.06
48
Enacting research ethics in partnerships with indigenous communities in Canada: "Do it in a good way".
2008
1.06
49
Creating community-based participatory research in a diverse community: a case study.
2008
1.06
50
Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.
2015
1.06
Next 50