Published in Qual Health Care on September 01, 2001
Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2004) 3.95
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences. Qual Health Care (2001) 1.99
Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparable. Heart (2002) 1.63
Engaging patients in medical decision making. BMJ (2001) 1.43
The effect of alternative summary statistics for communicating risk reduction on decisions about taking statins: a randomized trial. PLoS Med (2009) 1.29
A patient decision aid to support shared decision-making on anti-thrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care (2007) 1.22
Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies. Qual Health Care (2001) 1.18
Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper. Qual Health Care (2001) 1.16
Making decisions about benefits and harms of medicines. BMJ (2004) 1.16
Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study. Health Expect (2009) 1.12
Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion? Qual Health Care (2001) 1.07
Older people's perspectives on fall risk and fall prevention programs: a literature review. Int J Older People Nurs (2011) 0.91
How should the impact of different presentations of treatment effects on patient choice be evaluated? A pilot randomized trial. PLoS One (2008) 0.91
Patients' perception of the informed consent process for neurooncology clinical trials. Neuro Oncol (2008) 0.91
Doctor's views on disclosing or withholding information on low risks of complication. J Med Ethics (2007) 0.89
The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening. J Gen Intern Med (2008) 0.88
An audit of consent refusals in clinical research at a tertiary care center in India. J Postgrad Med (2015) 0.88
Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study. BMJ Open (2013) 0.84
Development and validation of a questionnaire on 'Satisfaction with dermatological treatment of hand eczema' (DermaSat). Health Qual Life Outcomes (2010) 0.84
The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicine: part 2: benefits versus risk of CT. Pediatr Radiol (2014) 0.84
Decisions to operate: the ASA grade 5 dilemma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl (2011) 0.83
Theory based health education: Application of health belief model for Iranian patients with myocardial infarction. J Res Med Sci (2011) 0.82
Differences in belief about likely outcomes account for differences in doctors' treatment preferences: but what accounts for the differences in belief? Qual Health Care (2001) 0.81
Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skills. Health Info Libr J (2013) 0.81
Health newscasts for increasing influenza vaccination coverage: an inductive reasoning game approach. PLoS One (2011) 0.80
Doctor, is a CT scan safe for my child? Br J Radiol (2013) 0.80
The incidental pulmonary nodule in a child. Part 2: Commentary and suggestions for clinical management, risk communication and prevention. Pediatr Radiol (2015) 0.80
Communication training for advanced medical students improves information recall of medical laypersons in simulated informed consent talks--a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ (2013) 0.79
What influences seniors' choice of medications for osteoarthritis? Qualitative inquiry. Can Fam Physician (2006) 0.78
From the Patient Perspective, Consent Forms Fall Short of Providing Information to Guide Decision Making. J Patient Saf (2016) 0.78
Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial. PLoS One (2012) 0.78
Economics and health promotion. Eur J Health Econ (2004) 0.78
Interventions and assessment tools addressing key concepts people need to know to appraise claims about treatment effects: a systematic mapping review. Syst Rev (2016) 0.77
Free Choice and Patient Best Interests. Health Care Anal (2016) 0.77
To know or not to know? Not the only question in familial breast cancer risk communication. Ecancermedicalscience (2011) 0.77
The effect of different cardiovascular risk presentation formats on intentions, understanding and emotional affect: a randomised controlled trial using a web-based risk formatter (protocol). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2010) 0.77
Interdisciplinary workshop in the philosophy of medicine: medical knowledge, medical duties. J Eval Clin Pract (2014) 0.75
An Empirically Informed Analysis of the Ethical Issues Surrounding Split Liver Transplantation in the United Kingdom. Camb Q Healthc Ethics (2016) 0.75
Improving health literacy: informed decision-making rather than informed consent for CT scans in children. Pediatr Radiol (2009) 0.75
Legal and psychological considerations for obtaining informed consent for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow (2016) 0.75
Using a graphical risk tool to examine willingness to take migraine prophylactic medications. Pain (2016) 0.75
Association between subjective risk perception and objective risk estimation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75
Understanding patients' decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA (1993) 4.60
Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun (2001) 4.54
Cancer: science and society and the communication of risk. BMJ (1996) 4.09
"Doctors' orders": controlled trial of supplementary, written information for patients. Br Med J (1979) 3.65
Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expect (2000) 3.63
Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Anal (1995) 2.89
The role of risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery. Med Decis Making (2001) 2.76
Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science (1989) 2.60
Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs. BMJ (1998) 2.59
Knowledge and communication difficulties for patients with chronic heart failure: qualitative study. BMJ (2000) 2.47
Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: what influences perceptions and can they be changed? Am J Public Health (1989) 2.00
Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters. Med Decis Making (1999) 2.00
Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences. Qual Health Care (2001) 1.99
Patients' understanding of medical risks: implications for genetic counseling. Obstet Gynecol (1999) 1.98
Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust. Risk Anal (1995) 1.38
Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger? Ann Oncol (1999) 1.33
Injections and self-help: risk and trust in Ugandan health care. Soc Sci Med (1998) 1.32
Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Epidemiol (1989) 1.30
A comparison of perceived and objective CVD risk in a general population. Am J Public Health (1989) 1.23
Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper. Qual Health Care (2001) 1.16
How patients' preferences for risk information influence treatment choice in a case of high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty: asymptomatic localized prostate cancer. Med Decis Making (1999) 1.15