Published in Rofo on July 01, 2002
BI-RADS categorisation of 2,708 consecutive nonpalpable breast lesions in patients referred to a dedicated breast care unit. Eur Radiol (2011) 0.84
[Percutaneous large core breast biopsy]. Pathologe (2006) 0.78
Second Opinion Assessment in Diagnostic Mammography at a Breast Cancer Centre. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd (2012) 0.75
Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology (2009) 1.67
Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results. Radiology (2007) 1.67
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate marker of tumor response to anti-angiogenic therapy in a xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme. J Magn Reson Imaging (2002) 1.59
Prostate postbrachytherapy seed distribution: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced, T1- and T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2007) 1.58
Image quality of a wet laser printer versus a paper printer for full-field digital mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2006) 1.40
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T. Radiology (2012) 1.25
US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology (2008) 1.20
Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology (2007) 1.18
Characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography laser mammography (CTLM): initial experience. Invest Radiol (2005) 1.10
Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology (2004) 1.09
Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast carcinomas: assessment with nonenhanced versus uspio-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology (2006) 1.09
Quantification of breast tumor microvascular permeability with feruglose-enhanced MR imaging: initial phase II multicenter trial. Radiology (2003) 1.05
MRI assessment of cervical cancer for adaptive radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol (2009) 1.04
Preoperative core needle biopsy does not increase local recurrence rate in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2006) 1.03
Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology (2004) 1.02
MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies. Eur Radiol (2014) 1.02
Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.01
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 1.00
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 0.98
Rate of malignancy in MRI-detected probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2014) 0.96
High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: can underestimation be predicted? Eur Radiol (2010) 0.96
Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates. Eur J Radiol (2007) 0.92
Using a dedicated lung-marker system for localization of pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2003) 0.92
Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of power Doppler US: effects of microbubble contrast agent in the differentiation of breast tumors. Eur J Radiol (2005) 0.91
Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology (2005) 0.90
3D versus 2D ultrasound: accuracy of volume measurement in human cadaver kidneys. Invest Radiol (2002) 0.89
Mammography: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information. Insights Imaging (2011) 0.87
[Diagnostic management of nipple discharge]. Wien Klin Wochenschr (2003) 0.86
Comparison of sitting versus prone position for stereotactic large-core breast biopsy in surgically proven lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 0.85
Unenhanced MDCT in patients with suspected urinary stone disease: do coronal reformations improve diagnostic performance? AJR Am J Roentgenol (2007) 0.85
Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T. Radiology (2014) 0.84
MRI-Guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-pathologic mismatch. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am (2006) 0.84
Strategies for the covalent conjugation of a bifunctional chelating agent to albumin: synthesis and characterization of potential MRI contrast agents. J Inorg Biochem (2010) 0.84
Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment. Invest Radiol (2015) 0.84
Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects. Breast Care (Basel) (2011) 0.83
Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc (2013) 0.82
Potential of dose reduction after marker placement with full-field digital mammography. Invest Radiol (2005) 0.81
Comparison of 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitors and 5-megapixel liquid crystal monitors for soft-copy reading in full-field digital mammography. Eur J Radiol (2009) 0.80
Utility (or not) of Gd-DTPA-based dynamic MRI for breast cancer diagnosis and grading. Acad Radiol (2002) 0.80
Sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography for detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion. Can Assoc Radiol J (2010) 0.80
Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2015) 0.78
Advances in breast imaging: a dilemma or progress? Recent Results Cancer Res (2009) 0.78
Lesion miss rates and false-negative rates for 1115 consecutive cases of stereotactically guided needle-localized open breast biopsy with long-term follow-up. Radiology (2005) 0.76
Teleradiology with uncompressed digital mammograms: clinical assessment. Eur J Radiol (2012) 0.75
The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions. Invest Radiol (2005) 0.75
Potential of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Characterization of Breast Lesions: Intraindividual Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Invest Radiol (2017) 0.75
Can galactography-guided stereotactic, 11-gauge, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of intraductal lesions serve as an alternative to surgical biopsy? Eur Radiol (2009) 0.75
Histopathologic correlation of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of human cervical tissue samples at 3 tesla: validation of a technique. Invest Radiol (2002) 0.75
[Factors influencing quality of mammograms]. Wien Klin Wochenschr (2003) 0.75
Association between pathology and texture features of multi parametric MRI of the prostate. Phys Med Biol (2017) 0.75
Validation of image quality in full-field digital mammography: is the replacement of wet by dry laser printers justified? Eur J Radiol (2006) 0.75
Dixon imaging-based partial volume correction improves quantification of choline detected by breast 3D-MRSI. Eur Radiol (2014) 0.75
Can a small-molecular gadolinium contrast agent be applied successfully with dynamic MRI to quantitatively define brain tumor microvascular responses to angiogenesis inhibition? Acad Radiol (2002) 0.75