Published in J Spinal Disord Tech on August 01, 2003
Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J (2008) 1.84
Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J (2005) 1.66
Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J (2007) 1.36
Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J (2006) 1.34
The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression. Eur Spine J (2008) 1.28
Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev (2007) 1.13
Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system. Eur Spine J (2009) 1.11
Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part II. No clinical benefit for asymptomatic, initially degenerated adjacent segments after 6 years follow-up. Eur Spine J (2010) 1.04
Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion. Eur Spine J (2010) 1.03
Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration. Eur Spine J (2006) 1.00
The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J (2010) 0.97
Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. Eur Spine J (2009) 0.94
Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs. Eur Spine J (2009) 0.94
Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. Eur Spine J (2011) 0.93
Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment. Eur Spine J (2009) 0.92
Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J (2011) 0.92
Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation. SAS J (2007) 0.84
Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis. SAS J (2007) 0.83
Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J (2011) 0.83
Clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated with lumbar decompression and the Cosmic "semi-rigid" posterior system. SAS J (2010) 0.82
Dynamic stabilisation in the treatment of degenerative disc disease with modic changes. Adv Orthop (2013) 0.82
Does semi-rigid instrumentation using both flexion and extension dampening spacers truly provide an intermediate level of stabilization? Adv Orthop (2013) 0.82
Role of dynesys as pedicle-based nonfusion stabilization for degenerative disc disorders. Adv Orthop (2012) 0.82
Circumferential dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis. Eur Spine J (2014) 0.81
Biomechanics of disc degeneration. Adv Orthop (2012) 0.81
Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed shape memory alloy hook in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in vitro model. PLoS One (2014) 0.80
The effects of single-level instrumented lumbar laminectomy on adjacent spinal biomechanics. Global Spine J (2014) 0.80
Is it possible to preserve lumbar lordosis after hybrid stabilization? Preliminary results of a novel rigid-dynamic stabilization system in degenerative lumbar pathologies. Eur Spine J (2015) 0.80
Limitations of current in vitro test protocols for investigation of instrumented adjacent segment biomechanics: critical analysis of the literature. Eur Spine J (2015) 0.80
The effect of design parameters of interspinous implants on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J (2014) 0.79
Segment-by-segment stabilization for degenerative disc disease: a hybrid technique. Eur Spine J (2010) 0.79
Back muscle changes after pedicle based dynamic stabilization. J Korean Neurosurg Soc (2013) 0.79
Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine: a systematic review. SAS J (2008) 0.78
Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J (2016) 0.78
Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J (2012) 0.78
A morphometric study of the lumbar spinous process in the Chinese population. Braz J Med Biol Res (2014) 0.78
The BioFlex System as a Dynamic Stabilization Device : Does It Preserve Lumbar Motion? J Korean Neurosurg Soc (2009) 0.77
Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilization systems. Adv Orthop (2013) 0.77
Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression- a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2013) 0.77
Does hybrid fixation prevent junctional disease after posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders? A minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J (2015) 0.77
The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems. Adv Orthop (2013) 0.77
Short-term effects of a dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys) for multi-segmental lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J (2015) 0.77
A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization. Adv Orthop (2012) 0.77
Skipping posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization for distant segment degenerative disease. Adv Orthop (2012) 0.77
Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2012) 0.77
Adjacent Segment Pathology after Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Asian Spine J (2015) 0.77
Pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization: literature review. Adv Orthop (2012) 0.76
Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc (2015) 0.75
Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence. SAS J (2011) 0.75
Clinical Experiences of Non-fusion Dynamic Stabilization Surgery for Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Lumbar Fusion. Int J Spine Surg (2016) 0.75
An in vivo kinematic comparison of dynamic lumbar stabilization to lumbar discectomy and posterior lumbar fusion using radiostereometric analysis. Int J Spine Surg (2012) 0.75
Simple facet joint repair with dynamic pedicular system: Technical note and case series. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine (2015) 0.75
In Vitro Comparison of Dynesys, PEEK, and Titanium Constructs in the Lumbar Spine. Adv Orthop (2015) 0.75
Hybrid Instrumentation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Three Different Instrumentation Techniques. Global Spine J (2017) 0.75
Comparison of the Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization System and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease. PLoS One (2016) 0.75
Single-Level Rigid Fixation Combined with Coflex: A Biomechanical Study. Med Sci Monit (2016) 0.75
Could the Topping-Off Technique Be the Preventive Strategy against Adjacent Segment Disease after Pedicle Screw-Based Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases? A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int (2017) 0.75
Evaluation of a Hybrid Dynamic Stabilization and Fusion System in the Lumbar Spine: A 10 Year Experience. Cureus (2016) 0.75
In vivo compatibility of Dynesys(®) spinal implants: a case series of five retrieved periprosthetic tissue samples and corresponding implants. Eur Spine J (2014) 0.75
Market approval processes for new types of spinal devices: challenges and recommendations for improvement. Eur Spine J (2016) 0.75
A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Eur Spine J (2016) 0.75
Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior column reconstruction: A finite element study. Surg Neurol Int (2017) 0.75
Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Eur Spine J (2016) 0.75
Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J (1998) 2.99
Changes in stretch reflex excitability are related to "giving way" symptoms in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Neurophysiol (2006) 1.94
Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study. J Neurosurg (2001) 1.80
Tenodeses destroy the kinematic coupling of the ankle joint complex. A three-dimensional in vitro analysis of joint movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1998) 1.77
A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation. Eur Spine J (1994) 1.65
Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data--a data set for the validation of models. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) (2001) 1.63
Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2001) 1.59
Laminectomy and functional impairment of the lumbar spine: the importance of muscle forces in flexible and rigid instrumented stabilization--a biomechanical study in vitro. Eur Spine J (1998) 1.56
Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg (2000) 1.53
The authority complex and the authoritarian personality. J Anal Psychol (1977) 1.44
A novel GABRG2 mutation associated with febrile seizures. Neurology (2006) 1.41
Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J Orthop Res (1997) 1.40
Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2000) 1.39
Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res (1999) 1.38
Cell alignment is induced by cyclic changes in cell length: studies of cells grown in cyclically stretched substrates. J Orthop Res (2001) 1.37
Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J (2006) 1.34
Mechanical boundary conditions of fracture healing: borderline indications in the treatment of unreamed tibial nailing. J Biomech (2001) 1.33
Tissue engineering of bone: effects of mechanical strain on osteoblastic cells in type I collagen matrices. Biomaterials (2005) 1.32
A deletion in SCN1B is associated with febrile seizures and early-onset absence epilepsy. Neurology (2003) 1.30
Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech (2001) 1.25
The influence of muscle forces and external loads on cruciate ligament strain. Am J Sports Med (1995) 1.24
Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech (2005) 1.24
Small animal bone healing models: standards, tips, and pitfalls results of a consensus meeting. Bone (2011) 1.24
VEGF producing bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) enhance vascularization and resorption of a natural coral bone substitute. Bone (2007) 1.21
Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery (1999) 1.21
Influence of extracellular osmolarity and mechanical stimulation on gene expression of intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res (2007) 1.20
Fibroblast orientation to stretch begins within three hours. J Orthop Res (2002) 1.20
Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech (1998) 1.19
Quantitative assessment of experimental fracture repair by peripheral computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int (1997) 1.19
Correlation of bone mineral density with strength and microstructural parameters of cortical bone in vitro. Bone (2002) 1.18
Sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis: its progression and radiological features. A study of 12 cases. Ann Rheum Dis (1992) 1.18
Irinotecan is active in chemonaive patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicentric trial. Br J Cancer (2003) 1.12
Clinical pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane. Clin Pharmacokinet (1999) 1.12
A computer touch-screen version of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument for the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005) 1.11
Biomechanical comparison of calf and human spines. J Orthop Res (1996) 1.10
Local tissue properties in bone healing: influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap. J Orthop Res (1998) 1.08
ISSLS prize winner: A novel approach to determine trunk muscle forces during flexion and extension: a comparison of data from an in vitro experiment and in vivo measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2003) 1.08
Dynamic cell stretching increases human osteoblast proliferation and CICP synthesis but decreases osteocalcin synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity. J Biomech (2000) 1.07
Capecitabine and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of an extended phase I study. Ann Oncol (2003) 1.07
Comparison of intradiscal pressures and spinal fixator loads for different body positions and exercises. Ergonomics (2001) 1.07
Importance of the intersegmental trunk muscles for the stability of the lumbar spine. A biomechanical study in vitro. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (1998) 1.06
Cyclic stretching of human osteoblasts affects proliferation and metabolism: a new experimental method and its application. J Orthop Res (1994) 1.05
Rodent animal models of delayed bone healing and non-union formation: a comprehensive review. Eur Cell Mater (2013) 1.02
Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) (2007) 1.02
[Stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of 3 different cages and bone cement for fusion of cervical vertebrae segments]. Orthopade (2002) 1.01
Preschoolers' and adults' reliance on object shape and object function for lexical extension. J Exp Child Psychol (1999) 1.01
The effect of micromovement on callus formation. J Orthop Sci (2001) 1.00
Influence of diclofenac (group of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) on fracture healing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2003) 0.98
Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement. Eur Spine J (2000) 0.97
Predictive value of Singh index and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography in determining the local cancellous bone quality of the proximal femur. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) (2001) 0.97
Biomechanical evaluation of a new modular rod-screw implant system for posterior instrumentation of the occipito-cervical spine: in-vitro comparison with two established implant systems. Eur Spine J (2000) 0.97
[Indication and methods of application with external fixation of the tibia (author's transl)]. Unfallheilkunde (1981) 0.97
The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac reduces appearance of osteoblasts in bone defect healing in rats. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2007) 0.96
Effects of specimen length on the monosegmental motion behavior of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2000) 0.95
Developments in the treatment of gastric cancer in Europe. Oncology (Williston Park) (2000) 0.94
Correction of axis misalignment in the analysis of knee rotations. Hum Mov Sci (2003) 0.94
Occupational exposure to volatile anaesthetics: epidemiology and approaches to reducing the problem. CNS Drugs (2001) 0.94
Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions. Eur Spine J (2001) 0.94
Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro. Eur Spine J (2000) 0.94
Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants (1998) 0.93
Spinal biomechanics and aging are major determinants of the proteoglycan metabolism of intervertebral disc cells. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2000) 0.93
Prolongation of the QT-interval during induction of anesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (1994) 0.93
Analysis of inter-fragmentary movement as a function of musculoskeletal loading conditions in sheep. J Biomech (1998) 0.92
Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) (2001) 0.92
A method to determine the 3-D stiffness of fracture fixation devices and its application to predict inter-fragmentary movement. J Biomech (1998) 0.92
Evaluation of a new monocortical screw for anterior cervical fusion and plating by a combined biomechanical and clinical study. Eur Spine J (1999) 0.92
Biomechanics of fixation systems to the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (1991) 0.91
Tracheostomy in cardiosurgical patients: surgical tracheostomy versus ciaglia and fantoni methods. Ann Thorac Surg (1999) 0.91
[The significant difference between the two values of torque for the lag screw and screw with two threaded holes in cortical bone (author's transl)]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir (1974) 0.91
A comparative biomechanical investigation of anterior lumbar interbody cages: central and bilateral approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2000) 0.91
Cell orientation induced by extracellular signals. Cell Biochem Biophys (1999) 0.91
[Acceleration of fracture healing with factor XIII]. Helv Chir Acta (1984) 0.91
Reconstruction of the lateral ligaments: do the anatomical procedures restore physiologic ankle kinematics? Foot Ankle Int (2004) 0.90
Early, full weightbearing with flexible fixation delays fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 0.90
[MAC-TL twin screw. A new thoracoscopic implantable stabilization system for treatment of vertebral fractures--implant design, implantation technique and in vitro testing]. Orthopade (2002) 0.90
Thoracolumbar fracture stabilization: comparative biomechanical evaluation of a new video-assisted implantable system. Eur Spine J (2003) 0.90
Radiographic results of callus distraction aided by pulsed low-intensity ultrasound. J Orthop Trauma (2001) 0.90
Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (1999) 0.89
Finite helical axes of motion are a useful tool to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine. Eur Spine J (2004) 0.89
Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) (2007) 0.89
Prediction of cortical bone porosity in vitro by microcomputed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int (2001) 0.89
Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading. J Neurosurg (2000) 0.89