Analysis of trends in coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention rates in Washington state from 1987 to 2001.

PubWeight™: 1.04‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMID 14516888)

Published in Am J Cardiol on October 01, 2003

Authors

Matthew R Ulrich1, Douglas M Brock, Andrew A Ziskind

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Medical Education and Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Articles citing this

A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease. CMAJ (2007) 2.35

Trends in coronary revascularization in the United States from 2001 to 2009: recent declines in percutaneous coronary intervention volumes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2011) 1.51

The Michigan Model for Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Validation. Diabetes Technol Ther (2015) 1.40

Progressively increasing operative risk among patients referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. Ulster Med J (2006) 0.86

The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine. Yale J Biol Med (2013) 0.84

Trends in percutaneous coronary interventions in new South Wales, Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2009) 0.82

A community-wide perspective into changing trends in the utilization of diagnostic and interventional procedures in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J (2007) 0.82

Changing outcomes of coronary revascularization in British Columbia, 1995-2001. Can J Cardiol (2006) 0.82

Detailing radio frequency heating induced by coronary stents: a 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance study. PLoS One (2012) 0.79

Mid-term outcomes of patients with PCI prior to CABG in comparison to patients with primary CABG. Vasc Health Risk Manag (2010) 0.77

Risk-benefit trade-offs in revascularisation choices. EuroIntervention (2011) 0.76

Retroperitoneal hemorrhage as a complication of percutaneous intervention: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Open Cardiovasc Med J (2013) 0.75