An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series.

PubWeight™: 3.21‹?› | Rank: Top 1%

🔗 View Article (PMID 14665835)

Published in J Urol on January 01, 2004

Authors

Misop Han1, Alan W Partin, David Y Chan, Patrick C Walsh

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

Articles citing this

Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology (2007) 4.02

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol (2010) 2.00

Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2006) 1.50

Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. J Cancer (2010) 1.36

Natural history of pathologically organ-confined (pT2), Gleason score 6 or less, prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Urology (2008) 1.27

Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve. JSLS (2007) 1.03

Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int (2010) 0.98

Long-term follow-up of 3-month neoadjuvant hormone therapy before radical prostatectomy in a randomized trial. BJU Int (2009) 0.95

Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: Genito-Urinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada Consensus Statement. Can Urol Assoc J (2008) 0.84

Determinants and effects of positive surgical margins after prostatectomy on prostate cancer mortality: a population-based study. BMC Urol (2014) 0.79

Contemporary radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer (2011) 0.78

Applications of robots in urology. J Robot Surg (2007) 0.77

Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: Population-based averages within PSA and Gleason strata. Can Urol Assoc J (2013) 0.76

Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol (2017) 0.75

Re: An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol (2004) 0.75

Prostate cancer: seminal vesicle sparing: a continuing trend? Nat Rev Urol (2009) 0.75

Re: An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol (2004) 0.75

Re: an evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol (2005) 0.75

Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care. Langenbecks Arch Surg (2011) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24. Nat Genet (2007) 19.18

Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA (2005) 8.72

Ligand-independent androgen receptor variants derived from splicing of cryptic exons signify hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2009) 7.11

Common sequence variants on 2p15 and Xp11.22 confer susceptibility to prostate cancer. Nat Genet (2008) 6.10

NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2010) 5.98

Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk. N Engl J Med (2012) 5.49

Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol (2011) 5.27

Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA (2008) 5.25

Two genome-wide association studies of aggressive prostate cancer implicate putative prostate tumor suppressor gene DAB2IP. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 4.85

Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol (2003) 4.66

Association between two unlinked loci at 8q24 and prostate cancer risk among European Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 4.24

African American men with very low-risk prostate cancer exhibit adverse oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: should active surveillance still be an option for them? J Clin Oncol (2013) 4.20

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program. J Clin Oncol (2010) 4.17

Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology (2007) 4.02

Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol (2011) 3.36

Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on prostate tissue in men with late-onset hypogonadism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2006) 3.32

Hypermethylation of CpG islands in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2004) 3.29

Obesity-related plasma hemodilution and PSA concentration among men with prostate cancer. JAMA (2007) 3.25

Evidence for two independent prostate cancer risk-associated loci in the HNF1B gene at 17q12. Nat Genet (2008) 3.14

Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Urol (2007) 3.14

Death in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: prostate-specific antigen doubling time subgroups and their associated contributions to all-cause mortality. J Clin Oncol (2007) 2.79

An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011. BJU Int (2012) 2.77

Germline mutations and sequence variants of the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk. Nat Genet (2002) 2.76

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int (2013) 2.69

Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results. J Urol (2002) 2.68

The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up. BJU Int (2011) 2.68

Retracted EPCA-2: a highly specific serum marker for prostate cancer. Urology (2007) 2.67

Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance. J Urol (2013) 2.66

A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range. J Urol (2011) 2.65

PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. J Urol (2008) 2.63

Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis. Cancer (2004) 2.61

Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson comorbidity index. Urology (2010) 2.54

Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3): development and internal validation of a novel biopsy nomogram. Eur Urol (2009) 2.45

A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 2.36

PTEN protein loss by immunostaining: analytic validation and prognostic indicator for a high risk surgical cohort of prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res (2011) 2.35

The Melbourne Consensus Statement on the early detection of prostate cancer. BJU Int (2014) 2.32

Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen. Urology (2010) 2.27

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma in adults: expanded clinical, pathologic, and genetic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol (2007) 2.20

HOXB13 is a susceptibility gene for prostate cancer: results from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG). Hum Genet (2012) 2.18

Metabolic factors associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2006) 2.17

Accuracy of PCA3 measurement in predicting short-term biopsy progression in an active surveillance program. J Urol (2009) 2.17

External validation of University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score. Urology (2008) 2.04

Re: Prostate-specific antigen concentration in young men: new estimates and review of the literature. J Urol (2012) 2.03

A germline DNA polymorphism enhances alternative splicing of the KLF6 tumor suppressor gene and is associated with increased prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res (2005) 2.02

A combined genomewide linkage scan of 1,233 families for prostate cancer-susceptibility genes conducted by the international consortium for prostate cancer genetics. Am J Hum Genet (2005) 1.96

Impact of surgical delay on long-term cancer control for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol (2004) 1.95

Individual and cumulative effect of prostate cancer risk-associated variants on clinicopathologic variables in 5,895 prostate cancer patients. Prostate (2009) 1.95

Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol (2004) 1.85

Prostate cancer, Version 3.2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2012) 1.84

Initial prostate biopsy: development and internal validation of a biopsy-specific nomogram based on the prostate cancer antigen 3 assay. Eur Urol (2012) 1.81

Association of [-2]proPSA with biopsy reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol (2012) 1.80

Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer? J Clin Oncol (2012) 1.78

Re: Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline: H. B. Carter, P. C. Albertsen, M. J. Barry, R. Etzioni, S. J. Freedland, K. L. Greene, L. Holmberg, P. Kantoff, B. R. Konety, M. H. Murad, D. F. Penson and A. L. Zietman J Urol 2013; 190: 419-426. J Urol (2013) 1.75

Adjuvant weekly docetaxel for patients with high risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional pilot study. J Urol (2007) 1.75

Association of prostate cancer risk variants with clinicopathologic characteristics of the disease. Clin Cancer Res (2008) 1.74

Indications for intervention during active surveillance of prostate cancer: a comparison of the Johns Hopkins and Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocols. BJU Int (2014) 1.73

Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol (2007) 1.72

Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of neoadjuvant celecoxib in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: evaluation of drug-specific biomarkers. J Clin Oncol (2009) 1.71

ProPSA and diagnostic biopsy tissue DNA content combination improves accuracy to predict need for prostate cancer treatment among men enrolled in an active surveillance program. Urology (2011) 1.71

Pooled genome linkage scan of aggressive prostate cancer: results from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics. Hum Genet (2006) 1.70

Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample. J Urol (2010) 1.64

Residual tumor potentially left behind after local ablation therapy in prostate adenocarcinoma. J Urol (2008) 1.63

Increased incidence of pathologically nonorgan confined prostate cancer in African-American men eligible for active surveillance. Urology (2013) 1.63

Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age: update 2003. Urology (2003) 1.62

Causes of death after radical prostatectomy at a large tertiary center. J Urol (2012) 1.61

Endoscopic basket extraction of a urethral foreign body. Urology (2003) 1.61

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol (2002) 1.60

Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: A prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Prostate (2010) 1.60

Inherited genetic variant predisposes to aggressive but not indolent prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 1.59

Geometric evaluation of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol (2012) 1.59

Radical prostatectomy in older men: survival outcomes in septuagenarians and octogenarians. BJU Int (2010) 1.58

Does perineural invasion on prostate biopsy predict adverse prostatectomy outcomes? BJU Int (2009) 1.58

Substratification of stage T1C prostate cancer based on the probability of biochemical recurrence. Urology (2002) 1.56