Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?

PubWeight™: 2.52‹?› | Rank: Top 2%

🔗 View Article (PMID 15316908)

Published in Cancer on September 01, 2004

Authors

Barbara K Rimer1, Peter A Briss, Paula K Zeller, Evelyn C Y Chan, Steven H Woolf

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295, USA. brimer@email.unc.edu

Articles citing this

Frustrated and confused: the American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences. J Gen Intern Med (2007) 1.90

Race, ethnicity, language, social class, and health communication inequalities: a nationally-representative cross-sectional study. PLoS One (2011) 1.90

Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. J Health Commun (2006) 1.83

Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study. J Gen Intern Med (2007) 1.70

Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based survey. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 1.67

Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making (2010) 1.61

Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer (2004) 1.41

Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey. Health Expect (2007) 1.38

Power to advocate for health. Ann Fam Med (2010) 1.30

The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2010) 1.21

Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go? Health Serv Res (2008) 1.19

Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates. Med Decis Making (2009) 1.15

How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuit. Ann Fam Med (2007) 1.11

Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams. BMC Public Health (2006) 1.10

Aid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med (2012) 1.08

Decision making and cancer. Am Psychol (2015) 1.05

African American men's and women's perceptions of clinical trials research: focusing on prostate cancer among a high-risk population in the South. J Health Care Poor Underserved (2013) 1.03

Preferences for human papillomavirus testing with routine cervical cancer screening in diverse older women. J Gen Intern Med (2008) 1.03

Informed decision-making among students analyzing their personal genomes on a whole genome sequencing course: a longitudinal cohort study. Genome Med (2013) 1.02

A randomized trial of a computer-tailored decision aid to improve prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the Take the Wheel trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 0.99

Sociocultural differences and colorectal cancer screening among African American men and women. Oncol Nurs Forum (2012) 0.96

Different perceptions of the burden of upper GI endoscopy: an empirical study in three patient groups. Qual Life Res (2007) 0.96

Patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening: who initiates elements of informed decision making? J Gen Intern Med (2012) 0.95

Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making. Health Expect (2011) 0.94

Maximizing informed cancer screening decisions. Arch Intern Med (2007) 0.93

A randomized trial comparing web-based decision aids on prostate cancer knowledge for African-American men. J Natl Med Assoc (2008) 0.92

Willingness to participate in mammography screening: a randomized controlled questionnaire study of responses to two patient information leaflets with different factual content. Dtsch Arztebl Int (2015) 0.92

A computer-tailored intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men. Am J Mens Health (2008) 0.89

Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the field. Cancer (2013) 0.87

Using the word 'cancer' in communication about an abnormal Pap test: finding common ground with patient-provider communication. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 0.87

African American prostate cancer survivors' treatment decision-making and quality of life. Patient Educ Couns (2012) 0.87

How does patient-clinician information engagement influence self-reported cancer-related problems?: findings from a longitudinal analysis. Cancer (2011) 0.87

Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet (2014) 0.85

How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 0.85

Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public. Genet Med (2015) 0.84

Class, race and ethnicity and information avoidance among cancer survivors. Br J Cancer (2013) 0.84

Financial incentives for increasing uptake of HPV vaccinations: a randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol (2014) 0.84

Communication between patients and providers and informed decision making. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2010) 0.82

Translating medical evidence to promote informed health care decisions. Health Serv Res (2011) 0.82

Moving towards shared decision making in prostate cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med (2007) 0.81

Decision making about cancer screening: an assessment of the state of the science and a suggested research agenda from the ASPO Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Communication Special Interest Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2009) 0.81

Do men make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening? Baseline results from the "take the wheel" trial. Med Decis Making (2010) 0.81

Decision Support and the Effectiveness of Web-based Delivery and Information Tailoring for Bowel Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Study. JMIR Res Protoc (2012) 0.81

Seniors' perceptions of prescription drug advertisements: a pilot study of the potential impact on informed decision making. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 0.80

Risk assessment and clinical decision making for colorectal cancer screening. Health Expect (2013) 0.80

Sociocultural and health correlates related to colorectal cancer screening adherence among urban African Americans. Cancer Nurs (2015) 0.80

Applying strategies from libertarian paternalism to decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening. BMC Cancer (2011) 0.79

Patterns of information behavior and prostate cancer knowledge among African-American men. J Cancer Educ (2011) 0.79

Risk Stratification and Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Decis Making (2016) 0.79

What we have learned from randomized trials of prostate cancer screening. Asian J Androl (2011) 0.78

A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing parents' vaccination decision-making in the United Kingdom. SSM Popul Health (2016) 0.78

Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study. BMJ Open (2015) 0.77

Affecting African American men's prostate cancer screening decision-making through a mobile tablet-mediated intervention. J Health Care Poor Underserved (2014) 0.77

Screening preferences of patients at familial risk of colorectal cancer. Dig Dis Sci (2007) 0.77

Digital Solutions for Informed Decision Making: An Academic-Community Partnership for the Development of a Prostate Cancer Decision Aid for African American Men. Am J Mens Health (2015) 0.77

Supporting Parental Decisions About Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: The NC NEXUS Decision Aid. Pediatrics (2016) 0.77

Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework. Health Expect (2012) 0.77

The role of communication in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts. BMC Cancer (2015) 0.77

Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials (2013) 0.76

Health-Related Decision-Making in HIV Disease. J Clin Psychol Med Settings (2016) 0.76

Health-weighted Composite Quality Metrics Offer Promise to Improve Health Outcomes in a Learning Health System. EGEMS (Wash DC) (2013) 0.75

Ethnic minority women prefer strong recommendations to be screened for cancer. BMC Public Health (2017) 0.75

Responses to Overdiagnosis in Thyroid Cancer Screening among Korean Women. Cancer Res Treat (2015) 0.75

The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? BMC Public Health (2016) 0.75

Using communication to manage uncertainty about cervical cancer screening guideline adherence among Appalachian women. J Appl Commun Res (2016) 0.75

Predictors of Participation in Mammography Screening among Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic Women. Front Public Health (2016) 0.75

The use of decision aids on early detection of prostate cancer: views of men and general practitioners. Health Expect (2016) 0.75

Women's experiences with cervical cancer screening in a colposcopy referral clinic in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75

Family physicians' intention to support women in making informed decisions about breast cancer screening with mammography: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Res Notes (2015) 0.75

Gist and verbatim communication concerning medication risks/benefits. Patient Educ Couns (2015) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08

Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2002) 12.65

Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician (2004) 5.29

Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med (2004) 5.18

Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology. J Clin Oncol (2002) 4.69

Interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med (2004) 4.07

What if we were equal? A comparison of the black-white mortality gap in 1960 and 2000. Health Aff (Millwood) (2005) 3.77

Chemoprevention of breast cancer: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2002) 3.41

Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med (2005) 3.34

Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2002) 3.06

Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. Am J Prev Med (2008) 3.05

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.91

Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care. Ann Fam Med (2004) 2.46

Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 2.38

Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature. J Fam Pract (2004) 2.24

Screening adults for type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med (2003) 2.16

One minute for prevention: the power of leveraging to fulfill the promise of health behavior counseling. Am J Prev Med (2002) 2.07

A vision for patient-centered health information systems. JAMA (2011) 2.00

Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med (2010) 1.98

Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract (2004) 1.96

The scientific basis for law as a public health tool. Am J Public Health (2008) 1.91

Firearms laws and the reduction of violence: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med (2005) 1.86

Integrating evidence-based clinical and community strategies to improve health. Am J Prev Med (2007) 1.82

Clinical and community delivery systems for preventive care: an integration framework. Am J Prev Med (2013) 1.76

The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med (2010) 1.68

Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer (2004) 1.60

Optimizing practice through research: a new perspective to solve an old problem. Ann Fam Med (2008) 1.60

Treatment of systemic hypertension in patients with pulmonary disease: COPD and asthma. Chest (2003) 1.55

Title VII funding and physician practice in rural or low-income areas. J Rural Health (2005) 1.54

Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation. Am J Prev Med (2007) 1.53

Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med (2012) 1.49

The effectiveness of early childhood home visitation in preventing violence: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med (2005) 1.47

Promoting evidence-based public health policy: can we have better evidence and more action? Health Aff (Millwood) (2006) 1.44

Use of beryllium lymphocyte proliferation testing for screening of asymptomatic individuals: an evidence-based assessment. J Occup Environ Med (2006) 1.44

Acute renal failure secondary to angiotensin II receptor blockade in a patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis. Pharmacotherapy (2003) 1.43

Screening for chlamydia infection: recommendations and rationale. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Nurs (2002) 1.43

Bridging primary care practices and communities to promote healthy behaviors. Am J Prev Med (2008) 1.42

Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making. Ann Fam Med (2007) 1.41

Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: what are the linkages to chronic disease risk? Prev Chronic Dis (2003) 1.35

An electronic linkage system for health behavior counseling effect on delivery of the 5A's. Am J Prev Med (2008) 1.26

Interventions to improve influenza, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and hepatitis B vaccination coverage among high-risk adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med (2005) 1.22

Health and economic benefits of reducing the number of students per classroom in US primary schools. Am J Public Health (2007) 1.22

The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2010) 1.21

The future of research that promotes cancer screening. Cancer (2004) 1.18

Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2011) 1.17

Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 1.15

How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuit. Ann Fam Med (2007) 1.11

Effect on cessation counseling of documenting smoking status as a routine vital sign: an ACORN study. Ann Fam Med (2008) 1.11

Making the case for a qualitative study of medical errors in primary care. Qual Health Res (2003) 1.08

Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion. Cancer (2004) 1.07

How patients want to engage with their personal health record: a qualitative study. BMJ Open (2013) 1.07

The top priority: building a better system for tobacco-cessation counseling. Am J Prev Med (2006) 1.04

When do we know enough to recommend action on the social determinants of health? Am J Prev Med (2011) 1.04

Promoting cancer screening: Learning from experience. Cancer (2004) 1.02

Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology. Blood (2002) 1.02

The association of hypertension and secondary cardiovascular disease with sleep-disordered breathing. Chest (2003) 0.97

External validity reporting in prevention research. Am J Prev Med (2008) 0.92

The liability of giving patients a choice: shared decision making and prostate cancer. Am Fam Physician (2005) 0.92

A comparison of web-based versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization. J Gen Intern Med (2014) 0.91

Inattention to the fidelity of health care delivery is costing lives. Am J Public Health (2007) 0.91

Promoting primary care smoking-cessation support with quitlines: the QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Prev Med (2010) 0.91

A smarter strategy? Reflections on fecal DNA screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med (2004) 0.90

Million hearts--where population health and clinical practice intersect. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2012) 0.90

Patient costs as a barrier to intensive health behavior counseling. Am J Prev Med (2010) 0.90

MyPreventiveCare: implementation and dissemination of an interactive preventive health record in three practice-based research networks serving disadvantaged patients--a randomized cluster trial. Implement Sci (2014) 0.89

We can reduce dietary sodium, save money, and save lives. Ann Intern Med (2010) 0.88

The price of false beliefs: unrealistic expectations as a contributor to the health care crisis. Ann Fam Med (2012) 0.86

Conflicts of interest and clinical recommendations: comparison of two concurrent clinical practice guidelines for primary immune thrombocytopenia developed by different methods. Am J Med Qual (2013) 0.86

It takes a partnership: the value of collaboration in developing and promoting a Web site for primary care patients. Ann Fam Med (2005) 0.85

Methods for conducting systematic reviews of evidence on effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Am J Prev Med (2008) 0.84

What is needed for informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: perspectives of African-American and Hispanic men. Health Educ Res (2008) 0.84

Patient weight counseling choices and outcomes following a primary care and community collaborative intervention. Patient Educ Couns (2010) 0.84

Shared decision making for prostate cancer screening: do patients or clinicians have a choice? Arch Intern Med (2009) 0.83

The priority is screening, not colonoscopy. Am J Public Health (2009) 0.82

Physician behaviors to promote informed decisions for prostate cancer screening: a National Research Network study. J Cancer Educ (2014) 0.81

Assessing information and best practices for public health emergency legal preparedness. J Law Med Ethics (2008) 0.80

Urinary sodium excretion and cardiovascular disease mortality. JAMA (2011) 0.79

Do dietary guidelines explain the obesity epidemic? Am J Prev Med (2008) 0.79

A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts. Patient Educ Couns (2009) 0.78

Newborn hearing screening: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs (2002) 0.78

Introducing the community guide's reviews of evidence on interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Am J Prev Med (2008) 0.77

Patient perceptions of how physicians communicate during prostate cancer screening discussions: a comparison of residents and faculty. Fam Med (2008) 0.77

1918 and 2009: a tale of two pandemics. Public Health Rep (2010) 0.76

Spanning the boundary between clinics and communities to address overweight and obesity in children. Pediatrics (2005) 0.75

Characteristics of a Multistate Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with E-cigarette Use, or Vaping - United States, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2019) 0.75

Methods for conducting systematic reviews of targeted vaccination strategies for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med (2005) 0.75

A comparison of review methods in tobacco prevention and control guidelines. Am J Health Behav (2003) 0.75