How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.

PubWeight™: 0.84‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 15791463)

Published in Exp Brain Res on December 10, 2004

Authors

Paolo Bernardis1, Paul Knox, Nicola Bruno

Author Affiliations

1: Dipartimento di Psicologia and BRAIN Center for Neuroscience, Università di Trieste, Trieste, Italy. bernardis@psico.units.it

Articles cited by this

Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Netw (1996) 6.49

Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci (2000) 3.66

Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci (2000) 1.69

Separate visual representations for perception and action revealed by saccadic eye movements. Curr Biol (2001) 1.62

Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci (1998) 1.56

Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1995) 1.25

Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci (2001) 1.24

Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn Sci (2001) 1.16

Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia (1996) 1.15

Separate adaptive mechanisms for the control of reactive and volitional saccadic eye movements. Vision Res (1995) 1.15

Effects of visual illusions on grasping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2001) 1.04

Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (2001) 1.01

Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (1999) 1.00

Why do some perceptual illusions affect visually guided action, when others don't? Trends Cogn Sci (2003) 0.97

Vying for dominance: dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus. Prog Brain Res (2002) 0.95

Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action. Percept Psychophys (2002) 0.95

Reaching affects saccade trajectories. Exp Brain Res (2001) 0.94

Ocular perturbations and retinal/extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements. Exp Brain Res (1999) 0.93

Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception (1996) 0.91

Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Müller-Lyer configuration. Psychol Sci (2000) 0.91

The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures. Percept Psychophys (1985) 0.89

The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol (2001) 0.88

When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses. Exp Brain Res (2003) 0.87

The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Exp Brain Res (2003) 0.87

Eye-hand coordination: eye to hand or hand to eye? Curr Biol (2000) 0.84

Differential effects of the Müller-Lyer illusion on reflexive and voluntary saccades. J Vis (2003) 0.83

Modifications in end positions of arm movements following short-term saccadic adaptation. Neuroreport (1995) 0.83

Spatial localization during pursuit eye movements. Vision Res (1979) 0.79

Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion. Psychon Bull Rev (2002) 0.79

Information about spatial location based on knowledge about efference. Psychol Rev (1965) 0.77

Eye-hand coordination: spatial localization after saccadic and pursuit eye movements. J Mot Behav (1994) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: which model is compatible with the available psychophysical and neuropsychological data? Vision Res (2011) 0.95

The effect of left-right reversal on film: Watching Kurosawa reversed. Iperception (2011) 0.93

Long-term efficacy of cryo catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial flutter: results from a repeat electrophysiologic study. J Am Coll Cardiol (2005) 0.85

When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades. Exp Brain Res (2007) 0.84

Cryothermal ablation treatment of atrial flutter--experience with a new 9 French 8 mm tip catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol (2005) 0.82

Comparison between a 7 French 6 mm tip cryothermal catheter and a 9 French 8 mm tip cryothermal catheter for cryoablation treatment of common atrial flutter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol (2005) 0.82

The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spatial predictability and saccadic latency. Exp Brain Res (2010) 0.81

Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography: a feasibility study. Europace (2013) 0.80

Amodal completion in visual search: preemption or context effects? Psychol Sci (2004) 0.78

Vision, haptics, and attention: new data from a multisensory Necker cube. Perception (2010) 0.77

Distance perception in autism and typical development. Perception (2009) 0.77

Implantable loop recorders: a novel method to judge patient perception of atrial fibrillation. Preliminary results from a pilot study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol (2004) 0.77

Low clinical recurrence and procedure benefits following treatment of common atrial flutter by electrogram-guided hot spot focal cryoablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol (2006) 0.75

Integrating perception and action through cognitive neuropsychology (broadly conceived). Cogn Neuropsychol (2009) 0.75

Coronary vasospasm and aborted sudden death treated with an implantable defibrillator and stenting. Ital Heart J (2002) 0.75

Illusory surfaces affect the integration of local motion signals. Vision Res (2004) 0.75

Impaired reading not due to visual field loss in a patient with a right-hemipsheric lesion. Neurocase (2013) 0.75

Measuring surface achromatic color: toward a common measure for increments and decrements. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput (2003) 0.75