Published in Health Econ on October 01, 2005
How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey. Health Econ (2009) 1.27
Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German? Eur J Health Econ (2010) 1.22
Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using Best-Worst Scaling: comparison of various methods of analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol (2008) 1.20
Channeling consumers to preferred providers and the impact of status quo bias: does type of provider matter? Health Serv Res (2010) 0.99
The Predictive Value of Discrete Choice Experiments in Public Health: An Exploratory Application. Patient (2015) 0.91
Type 2 diabetes patients' preferences and willingness to pay for lifestyle programs: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health (2013) 0.89
Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers' channeling incentives on pharmacy choice. Int J Health Care Finance Econ (2009) 0.86
Designing a package of sexual and reproductive health and HIV outreach services to meet the heterogeneous preferences of young people in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ Rev (2015) 0.86
Heterogeneous HIV testing preferences in an urban setting in Tanzania: results from a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One (2014) 0.85
Bristol girls dance project feasibility study: using a pilot economic evaluation to inform design of a full trial. BMJ Open (2013) 0.84
Patient Preferences for Features of Health Care Delivery Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Health Serv Res (2015) 0.83
Investigating preferences for support with life after stroke: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res (2014) 0.81
Are patients willing to pay for total shoulder arthroplasty? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Can J Surg (2016) 0.81
The effect of out-of-pocket costs and financial rewards in a discrete choice experiment: an application to lifestyle programs. BMC Public Health (2014) 0.81
Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). BMC Health Serv Res (2013) 0.80
The effect of including an opt-out option in discrete choice experiments. PLoS One (2014) 0.80
Residential preferences for river network improvement: an exploration of choice experiments in Zhujiajiao, Shanghai, China. Environ Manage (2014) 0.79
Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for a home or clinic based program of chronic heart failure management: findings from the Which? trial. PLoS One (2013) 0.78
Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care models. Eur J Health Econ (2013) 0.78
Using qualitative research to facilitate the interpretation of quantitative results from a discrete choice experiment: insights from a survey in elderly ophthalmologic patients. Patient Prefer Adherence (2016) 0.78
Prioritising patients for bariatric surgery: building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy. BMJ Open (2015) 0.77
One size does not fit all: HIV testing preferences differ among high-risk groups in Northern Tanzania. AIDS Care (2015) 0.77
Parents' preferences for enhanced access in the pediatric medical home: a discrete choice experiment. JAMA Pediatr (2015) 0.76
The use of specialty training to retain doctors in Malawi: A discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med (2016) 0.75
Evaluation of psoriasis patients' attitudes toward benefit-risk and therapeutic trade-offs in their choice of treatments. Patient Prefer Adherence (2017) 0.75
Heterogeneity in general practitioners' preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France. Health Econ Rev (2016) 0.75
An exploration of parents' preferences for foot care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a possible role for the discrete choice experiment. J Foot Ankle Res (2014) 0.75
Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment. Health Expect (2016) 0.75
Patient Preferences for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient (2017) 0.75
Renal transplant patients' preference for the supply and delivery of immunosuppressants in Wales: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Nephrol (2017) 0.75
Riverscape and groundwater preservation: a choice experiment. Environ Manage (2013) 0.75
Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels. Environ Manage (2017) 0.75
Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ (2012) 0.75
Discrete-choice modelling of patient preferences for modes of drug administration. Health Econ Rev (2017) 0.75
Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ (2010) 1.80
Number needed to treat: easily understood and intuitively meaningful? Theoretical considerations and a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol (2002) 1.79
Influenza pandemic: perception of risk and individual precautions in a general population. Cross sectional study. BMC Public Health (2007) 1.24
Danish GPs' perception of disease risk and benefit of prevention. Fam Pract (2002) 1.19
Preference heterogeneity and choice of cardiac rehabilitation program: results from a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy (2007) 1.15
International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2005) 1.14
Can postponement of an adverse outcome be used to present risk reductions to a lay audience? A population survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2007) 1.11
Insensitivity to scope in contingent valuation studies: reason for dismissal of valuations? Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2012) 1.08
Laypersons' understanding of relative risk reductions: randomised cross-sectional study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 1.07
Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles' heel? Health Econ (2003) 1.06
Waist circumference and body mass index as predictors of health care costs. PLoS One (2008) 1.05
Communicating risk using absolute risk reduction or prolongation of life formats: cluster-randomised trial in general practice. Br J Gen Pract (2014) 1.05
Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer (2013) 1.03
Preference for practice: a Danish study on young doctors' choice of general practice using a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ (2013) 1.03
Time-trends in health technology assessments: an analysis of developments in composition of international health technology assessments from 1989 to 2002. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2005) 1.02
Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete choice experiments: need we worry? Health Econ (2006) 0.99
Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: telephone contact with long-term non-attendees in Sweden. Results from RACOMIP, a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer (2013) 0.98
Comparing hospital costs: what is gained by accounting for more than a case-mix index? Soc Sci Med (2009) 0.96
Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment. Value Health (2012) 0.93
Estimating the Danish populations' preferences for pharmacogenetic testing using a discrete choice experiment. The case of treating depression. Value Health (2008) 0.93
Organisational determinants of production and efficiency in general practice: a population-based study. Eur J Health Econ (2011) 0.92
Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: the 'chained' approach. Soc Sci Med (2013) 0.91
General practitioners' preferences for the organisation of primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy (2012) 0.90
Communicating effectiveness of intervention for chronic diseases: what single format can replace comprehensive information? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2008) 0.89
Willingness to pay for allergy-vaccination among Danish patients with respiratory allergy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2010) 0.87
Communicating treatment effectiveness in the context of chronic disease processes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res (2006) 0.87
Trends in time to invasive examination and treatment from 2001 to 2009 in patients admitted first time with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina in Denmark. BMJ Open (2014) 0.86
Do informal caregivers in mental illness feel more burdened? A comparative study of mental versus somatic illnesses. Scand J Public Health (2011) 0.84
Medication effectiveness may not be the major reason for accepting cardiovascular preventive medication: a population-based survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2012) 0.84
Patient related outcomes in a real life prospective follow up study: Allergen immunotherapy increase quality of life and reduce sick days. World Allergy Organ J (2013) 0.83
Increasing marginal utility of small increases in life-expectancy? Results from a population survey. J Health Econ (2010) 0.83
Economic costs of abdominal obesity. Obes Facts (2008) 0.83
The impact of population ageing on future Danish drug expenditure. Health Policy (2005) 0.82
Radiation from mobile phone systems: Is it perceived as a threat to people's health? Bioelectromagnetics (2009) 0.81
Patient preferences for pharmacogenetic screening in depression. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2008) 0.81
Differences in general practice initiated expenditures across Danish local health authorities-A multilevel analysis. Health Policy (2009) 0.81
Characteristics of patients receiving allergy vaccination: to which extent do socio-economic factors play a role? Eur J Public Health (2010) 0.81
Exploring the relationship between costs and quality: does the joint evaluation of costs and quality alter the ranking of Danish hospital departments? Eur J Health Econ (2010) 0.80
Short and long-term labour market consequences of coronary heart disease: a register-based follow-up study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil (2009) 0.80
The influence of information and private versus public provision on preferences for screening for prostate cancer: a willingness-to-pay study. Health Policy (2011) 0.80
Willingness-to-pay for a population program aimed at reducing dietary salt in Denmark. Prev Med (2006) 0.80
Future costs in cost-effectiveness analysis: an empirical assessment. Eur J Health Econ (2010) 0.80
Effects of alternative styles of risk information on EMF risk perception. Bioelectromagnetics (2010) 0.79
Costs of heart disease and risk behaviour: implications for expenditure on prevention. Scand J Public Health (2008) 0.79
Does the EQ-5D measure quality of life in schizophrenia? J Ment Health Policy Econ (2011) 0.79
Individual decision making in relation to participation in cardiovascular screening: a study of revealed and stated preferences. Scand J Public Health (2013) 0.79
Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in Danish women. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol (2005) 0.78
Does access to invasive examination and treatment influence socioeconomic differences in case fatality for patients admitted for the first time with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina? EuroIntervention (2016) 0.78
Impact of effectiveness information format on patient choice of therapy and satisfaction with decisions about chronic disease medication: the "Influence of intervention Methodologies on Patient Choice of Therapy (IMPACT)" cluster-randomised trial in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res (2013) 0.78
Are people who claim compensation "cured by a verdict"? A longitudinal study of health outcomes after whiplash. J Law Med (2012) 0.77
NNT is not easily understood. Fam Pract (2002) 0.77
[Obesity related health care costs assessed from BMI or waist circumference--secondary publication]. Ugeskr Laeger (2009) 0.77
Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an economic analysis. Health Econ (2002) 0.76
Norwegian obstetricians' opinions about cesarean section on maternal request: should women pay themselves? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (2010) 0.76
Investigating patients' preferences for cardiac rehabilitation in Denmark. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2006) 0.76
Handling value added tax (VAT) in economic evaluations: should prices include VAT? Appl Health Econ Health Policy (2006) 0.76
[Association between productivity, list size, patient and practice characteristics in general practice]. Ugeskr Laeger (2010) 0.75
Does the primary screening test influence women's anxiety and intention to screen for cervical cancer? A randomized survey of Norwegian women. BMC Public Health (2014) 0.75
The concept of risk: a comment to Reventlow and co-workers. Scand J Prim Health Care (2002) 0.75
Benign breast disease and breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2005) 0.75
Valuation of morbidity and mortality risk reductions. Does context matter? Accid Anal Prev (2012) 0.75
[General practitioners' perception of disease risks and benefit of prevention]. Ugeskr Laeger (2002) 0.75
Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the number-needed-to-treat: common sense or non-sense? Health Econ (2004) 0.75
[Prioritization and health--should maximum-price life years be introduced?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2007) 0.75
Do guidelines recommending pharmacogenetic testing of psychiatric patients affect treatment costs and the use of healthcare services? Scand J Public Health (2011) 0.75
GPs as citizens' agents: prescription behavior and altruism. Eur J Health Econ (2008) 0.75
The potential of smoking cessation programmes and a smoking ban in public places: comparing gain in life expectancy and cost effectiveness. Scand J Public Health (2011) 0.75
Graded pairs comparison - does strength of preference matter? Analysis of preferences for specialised nurse home visits for pain management. Health Econ (2007) 0.75