Evidence on antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section alone is not sufficient to change the practices of doctors in a teaching hospital.

PubWeight™: 0.75^‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 15916655)

Published in J Obstet Gynaecol Res on June 01, 2005

Authors

Tippawan Liabsuetrakul¹, Monir Islam

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. ltippawa@hotmail.com

Articles citing this ↘

Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section. BJOG (2011) 1.05

Articles by these authors ⇆

Stillbirths: why they matter. Lancet (2011) 4.07

The Safe Motherhood Initiative and beyond. Bull World Health Organ (2007) 1.22

Determinants of salt sensitivity in black and white normotensive and hypertensive women. Hypertension (2003) 1.17

Surgical Care and Health Systems. World J Surg (2015) 1.16

The village-based midwife programme in Indonesia. Lancet (2008) 1.09

Delivery of MDG 5 by active management with data. Lancet (2008) 1.06