Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.

PubWeight™: 11.15‹?› | Rank: Top 0.1%

🔗 View Article (PMID 16014596)

Published in JAMA on July 13, 2005

Authors

John P A Ioannidis1

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece. jioannid@cc.uoi.gr

Articles citing this

(truncated to the top 100)

A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet (2012) 50.94

Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med (2005) 41.68

Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci (2012) 7.17

Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Med (2008) 5.09

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci (2009) 4.47

False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: a plea for epistemological modesty. J Natl Cancer Inst (2008) 3.72

Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 3.67

Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation. Prev Sci (2015) 2.95

Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Front Hum Neurosci (2013) 2.78

Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis. BMJ (2006) 2.47

Current status of endovascular stroke treatment. Circulation (2011) 2.42

Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ (2006) 2.40

Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics. Perspect Psychol Sci (2016) 2.36

Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS One (2006) 2.24

Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature. PLoS Med (2005) 2.18

Cause or Effect? Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Falls in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry (2014) 2.08

Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process. Neth Heart J (2009) 2.02

Systemic safety of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2014) 1.95

SHRINE: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies. PLoS One (2013) 1.80

Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review. Nature (2013) 1.73

Diffusion-weighted imaging and diagnosis of transient ischemic attack. Ann Neurol (2014) 1.72

What do we know and when do we know it? J Comput Aided Mol Des (2008) 1.68

Evolution and translation of research findings: from bench to where? PLoS Clin Trials (2006) 1.60

Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation. Front Comput Neurosci (2012) 1.56

Speed of updating online evidence based point of care summaries: prospective cohort analysis. BMJ (2011) 1.51

Effectiveness of a Statewide Abusive Head Trauma Prevention Program in North Carolina. JAMA Pediatr (2015) 1.48

Clarithromycin for 2 weeks for stable coronary heart disease: 6-year follow-up of the CLARICOR randomized trial and updated meta-analysis of antibiotics for coronary heart disease. Cardiology (2008) 1.47

Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores. PLoS One (2015) 1.45

Principles underlying the use of multiple informants' reports. Annu Rev Clin Psychol (2012) 1.44

The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Med Res Methodol (2006) 1.40

On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Front Neurosci (2012) 1.31

Selection in reported epidemiological risks: an empirical assessment. PLoS Med (2007) 1.30

The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology. Neth Heart J (2009) 1.30

Seven deadly sins of environmental epidemiology and the virtues of precaution. Epidemiology (2008) 1.26

Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 1.26

Publication bias in psychology: a diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size. PLoS One (2014) 1.23

Effectiveness of Practices To Increase Timeliness of Providing Targeted Therapy for Inpatients with Bloodstream Infections: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev (2016) 1.23

Cereal-induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive. Proc Biol Sci (2009) 1.21

Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Fam Med (2007) 1.19

Reporting of human genome epidemiology (HuGE) association studies: an empirical assessment. BMC Med Res Methodol (2008) 1.17

Conceptualizing changes in behavior in intervention research: the range of possible changes model. Psychol Rev (2006) 1.15

Effects of zinc supplementation on diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr (2012) 1.14

Harnessing the placebo effect: the need for translational research. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2011) 1.11

Memantine augmentation in clozapine-refractory schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Psychol Med (2016) 1.09

A critique of statistical hypothesis testing in clinical research. J Ayurveda Integr Med (2011) 1.08

When should potentially false research findings be considered acceptable? PLoS Med (2007) 1.07

Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review. BMC Med (2015) 1.07

Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? Yes. BMJ (2008) 1.06

Look back in anger - what clinical studies tell us about preclinical work. ALTEX (2013) 1.04

p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research. PLoS One (2016) 1.03

Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic. Syst Rev (2015) 1.03

Red Meat and Colorectal Cancer: A Quantitative Update on the State of the Epidemiologic Science. J Am Coll Nutr (2015) 1.02

Decision-making in research tasks with sequential testing. PLoS One (2009) 1.02

Translating stem cell research to cardiac disease therapies: pitfalls and prospects for improvement. J Am Coll Cardiol (2014) 1.02

Quantifying selective reporting and the Proteus phenomenon for multiple datasets with similar bias. PLoS One (2011) 1.02

Type A behavior pattern and coronary heart disease: Philip Morris's "crown jewel". Am J Public Health (2012) 1.01

Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods. BMC Med Res Methodol (2014) 1.00

Effect of statins on venous thromboembolic events: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished evidence from randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med (2012) 0.99

The use of older studies in meta-analyses of medical interventions: a survey. Open Med (2009) 0.99

Innovations in Endosurgery-Journey into the Past of the Future: To Ride the SILS Bandwagon or Not? Indian J Surg (2012) 0.97

Media coverage of medical journals: do the best articles make the news? PLoS One (2014) 0.96

The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol (2014) 0.96

Is personality a key predictor of missing study data? An analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med (2009) 0.94

"They would say that, wouldn't they?" A reader's guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical research. J R Soc Med (2006) 0.94

A user's guide to the NINDS rt-PA stroke trial database. PLoS Med (2008) 0.93

How current are leading evidence-based medical textbooks? An analytic survey of four online textbooks. J Med Internet Res (2012) 0.93

Why most published research findings are false: author's reply to Goodman and Greenland. PLoS Med (2007) 0.93

The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci (2016) 0.93

Misrepresentation of neuroscience data might give rise to misleading conclusions in the media: the case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. PLoS One (2011) 0.92

Position Paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group Cellular Biology of the Heart: cell-based therapies for myocardial repair and regeneration in ischemic heart disease and heart failure. Eur Heart J (2016) 0.91

Do Orthopaedic Surgeons Acknowledge Uncertainty? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 0.91

Closing the treatment gap for mental, neurological and substance use disorders by strengthening existing health care platforms: strategies for delivery and integration of evidence-based interventions. Int J Ment Health Syst (2015) 0.91

Trials stopped early for benefit? Not so fast! Crit Care (2007) 0.91

Negativland - a home for all findings in psychology. BMC Psychol (2013) 0.91

Report the awful truth! Nat Nanotechnol (2013) 0.90

Research Units of Pediatric Psychopharmacology (RUPP) autism network randomized clinical trial of parent training and medication: one-year follow-up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2012) 0.90

Control Outcomes and Exposures for Improving Internal Validity of Nonrandomized Studies. Health Serv Res (2015) 0.90

Incremental efficacy of adding bupropion to the nicotine patch for smoking cessation in smokers with a recent history of alcohol dependence: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend (2011) 0.90

Prediction of responders for outcome measures of locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke trial. J Rehabil Res Dev (2014) 0.89

Effect of initial conditions on reproducibility of scientific research. Acta Inform Med (2014) 0.89

Potential increased risk of cancer from commonly used medications: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Ann Oncol (2013) 0.89

The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling. BMC Med Ethics (2012) 0.89

Why most biomedical findings echoed by newspapers turn out to be false: the case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. PLoS One (2012) 0.88

Not the last word: Harvard beats Yale and other fallacies. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 0.88

Significance testing as perverse probabilistic reasoning. BMC Med (2011) 0.88

Hypertension: empirical evidence and implications in 2014. Open Heart (2014) 0.87

Teach It, Don't Preach It: The Differential Effects of Directly-communicated and Self-generated Utility Value Information. Motiv Sci (2015) 0.86

Collective Experience: A Database-Fuelled, Inter-Disciplinary Team-Led Learning System. J Comput Sci Eng (2012) 0.86

Gain-framed messages do not motivate sun protection: a meta-analytic review of randomized trials comparing gain-framed and loss-framed appeals for promoting skin cancer prevention. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2012) 0.86

TGFBR2 and BAX mononucleotide tract mutations, microsatellite instability, and prognosis in 1072 colorectal cancers. PLoS One (2011) 0.86

Randomization Does Not Help Much, Comparability Does. PLoS One (2015) 0.85

Replication Validity of Initial Association Studies: A Comparison between Psychiatry, Neurology and Four Somatic Diseases. PLoS One (2016) 0.84

The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine. Yale J Biol Med (2013) 0.84

Factors associated with publication of randomized phase iii cancer trials in journals with a high impact factor. Curr Oncol (2014) 0.84

NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact. Am J Eval (2015) 0.83

Molecular bias. Eur J Epidemiol (2005) 0.83

Epidemiological methods: about time. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2009) 0.83

Recent evidence on the management of bronchiolitis. Curr Opin Pediatr (2014) 0.82

Why is the center of evidence-based dermatology relevant to Indian dermatology? Indian J Dermatol (2009) 0.82

Citation Sentiment Analysis in Clinical Trial Papers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc (2015) 0.82