Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

PubWeight™: 1.14‹?› | Rank: Top 10%

🔗 View Article (PMID 16151344)

Published in Otol Neurotol on September 01, 2005

Authors

Carl A Verschuur1, Mark E Lutman, Richard Ramsden, Paula Greenham, Martin O'Driscoll

Author Affiliations

1: Hearing and Balance Center, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK. cav@isvr.soton.ac.uk

Associated clinical trials:

Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children With the MED-EL Cochlear Implant | NCT00784043

Articles citing this

Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear (2009) 2.25

The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system. Trends Amplif (2006) 1.44

Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation. Ear Hear (2008) 1.38

Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). J Am Acad Audiol (2009) 1.31

Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Ear Hear (2012) 1.10

Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital (2011) 1.00

Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2010) 0.99

Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research. J Neurosci Methods (2007) 0.98

Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Ear Hear (2009) 0.96

An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears. J Am Acad Audiol (2010) 0.93

Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation. J Neurosci (2014) 0.93

Performance over time on adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants. J Am Acad Audiol (2010) 0.88

Cochlear implantation in nontraditional candidates: preliminary results in adolescents with asymmetric hearing loss. Otol Neurotol (2013) 0.87

Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear (2010) 0.84

A longitudinal study in adults with sequential bilateral cochlear implants: time course for individual ear and bilateral performance. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2014) 0.80

Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research. J Am Acad Audiol (2012) 0.79

Spatial hearing of normally hearing and cochlear implanted children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol (2011) 0.78

Localization training results in individuals with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss. Hear Res (2014) 0.76

The Relationship Between Intensity Coding and Binaural Sensitivity in Adults With Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear (2016) 0.75

Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners. Ear Hear (2016) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol (2005) 1.93

Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol (2006) 1.66

Incidence of vestibular schwannoma and neurofibromatosis 2 in the North West of England over a 10-year period: higher incidence than previously thought. Otol Neurotol (2005) 1.60

Spinal tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2. Is emerging knowledge of genotype predictive of natural history? J Neurosurg Spine (2005) 1.46

Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear (2002) 1.41

Alternatively spliced isoforms of the human constitutive androstane receptor. Nucleic Acids Res (2003) 1.30

Genetic analysis of mitochondrial complex II subunits SDHD, SDHB and SDHC in paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma susceptibility. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2003) 1.14

Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol (2005) 1.10

Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol (2006) 1.06

Intracranial/Extracranial meningioma arising in the hypoglossal canal: case report. Skull Base (2007) 1.04

Optimizing the clinical fit of auditory brain stem implants. Ear Hear (2005) 1.02

Results from a European clinical investigation of the Nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem implant. Ear Hear (2002) 0.98

The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. J Acoust Soc Am (2003) 0.95

Auditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statement. Otol Neurotol (2011) 0.94

A phase II study of neoadjuvant biochemotherapy for stage III melanoma. Cancer (2002) 0.94

Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets. Ear Hear (2002) 0.91

Learning to discriminate interaural time differences: an exploratory study with amplitude-modulated stimuli. Int J Audiol (2006) 0.90

Measuring outcome from Vestibular Rehabilitation, Part I: Qualitative development of a new self-report measure. Int J Audiol (2008) 0.88

The effects of improving hearing in dementia. Age Ageing (2003) 0.87

Noninvasive measurement of protein aggregation by mutant huntingtin fragments or alpha-synuclein in the lens. J Biol Chem (2007) 0.87

Survey of mobile phone use and their chronic effects on the hearing of a student population. Int J Audiol (2007) 0.87

Measuring outcome from vestibular rehabilitation, part II: refinement and validation of a new self-report measure. Int J Audiol (2009) 0.86

Learning to discriminate interaural time differences at low and high frequencies. Int J Audiol (2007) 0.85

Absence of short-term effects of UMTS exposure on the human auditory system. Radiat Res (2010) 0.84

Cochlear implantation in patients deafened by ototoxic drugs. Cochlear Implants Int (2013) 0.83

Effects of GSM cellular phones on human hearing: the European project "GUARD". Radiat Res (2007) 0.83

Self-reported outcome in new hearing aid users over a 24-week post-fitting period. Int J Audiol (2005) 0.83

Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness. Int J Audiol (2011) 0.82

Cochlear implantation after bacterial meningitis in children: outcomes in ossified and nonossified cochleas. Otol Neurotol (2011) 0.82

Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period. Int J Audiol (2005) 0.82

Effects of UMTS cellular phones on human hearing: results of the European project EMFnEAR. Radiat Res (2009) 0.82

Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study. Int J Audiol (2013) 0.82

Changes in psychophysical parameters during the first month of programming the nucleus contour and contour advance cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int (2006) 0.82

Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay. Ear Hear (2013) 0.82

English consensus protocol evaluating candidacy for auditory brainstem and cochlear implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2. Otol Neurotol (2013) 0.81

The educational settings of profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants compared with age-matched peers with hearing aids: implications for management. Int J Audiol (2002) 0.81

Primary cultures of human vestibular schwannoma: selective growth of schwannoma cells. Otol Neurotol (2007) 0.81

An investigation of the use of band-limited chirp stimuli to obtain the auditory brainstem response. Int J Audiol (2002) 0.80

Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions. Ear Hear (2005) 0.79

The auditory middle latency response, evoked using maximum length sequences and chirps, as an indicator of adequacy of anesthesia. Anesth Analg (2006) 0.79

Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids. Int J Audiol (2004) 0.79

The influence of visual feedback on closed-set word test performance over time. Int J Audiol (2005) 0.79

Electrode Selection and Speech Understanding in Patients With Auditory Brainstem Implants. Ear Hear (2015) 0.78

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders. Cochlear Implants Int (2014) 0.77

Parents and their cochlear implanted child: questionnaire development to assess parental views and experiences. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol (2004) 0.77

Measuring real-ear signal-to-noise ratio: application to directional hearing aids. Int J Audiol (2010) 0.77

A parametric model of the spectral periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am (2003) 0.77

Methodology for quantifying perceptual effects from noise suppression systems. Int J Audiol (2005) 0.77

Dynamic nonlinear cochlear model predictions of click-evoked otoacoustic emission suppression. Hear Res (2005) 0.77

Mechanisms of generation of the 2f2-f1 distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am (2006) 0.76

The effect of suppression on the periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions: experimental data. J Acoust Soc Am (2003) 0.76

Modeling the effect of suppression on the periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am (2003) 0.76

Vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing ear: cochlear implant or auditory brainstem implant? Otol Neurotol (2005) 0.76

Effects of mobile phone exposure on time frequency fine structure of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 0.76

A mechanism for simultaneous suppression of tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res (2012) 0.76

Reply to the Comment on 'International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the constructor of multilingual speech test by Akeroyd et al' by Cas Smits. Int J Audiol (2016) 0.75

Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the UK Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Service. Otol Neurotol (2022) 0.75

Bilateral cochlear implantation after ethylene glycol intoxication: a case report. Cochlear Implants Int (2011) 0.75

Transient evoked otoacoustic emission input-output function variation in a large sample of neonates and implications for hearing screening. Int J Audiol (2007) 0.75

Spontaneous resolution, after superselective angiography, of pulsatile tinnitus resulting from dural arteriovenous fistula. Int Tinnitus J (2004) 0.75

Investigations into electrically evoked stapedius reflex measures and subjective loudness percepts in the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Cochlear Implants Int (2005) 0.75

Preface. Cochlear Implants Int (2003) 0.75

Does static ear canal pressure influence pure tone pitch perception? Acta Otolaryngol (2004) 0.75

Transducer hysteresis contributes to "stimulus artifact" in the measurement of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (L). J Acoust Soc Am (2005) 0.75

Optimizing the acquisition time of the middle latency response using maximum length sequences and chirps. J Acoust Soc Am (2002) 0.75