Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

PubWeight™: 1.72‹?› | Rank: Top 3%

🔗 View Article (PMID 16579492)

Published in Int J Audiol on March 01, 2006

Authors

William Noble1, Stuart Gatehouse

Author Affiliations

1: School of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia. wnoble@une.edu.au

Associated clinical trials:

Cochlear Implantation for Treatment of Single-sided Deafness | NCT02532972

Behavioral Manifestations of Listening Effort | NCT03087045

Articles citing this

Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear (2009) 2.25

Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). J Am Acad Audiol (2009) 1.31

Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem. Trends Amplif (2008) 1.10

Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task. J Am Acad Audiol (2011) 1.00

Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol (2009) 0.98

Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers. J Acoust Soc Am (2012) 0.97

New perspectives on assessing amplification effects. Trends Amplif (2006) 0.97

Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Ear Hear (2009) 0.96

A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12. Int J Audiol (2013) 0.96

Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS. Ear Hear (2009) 0.95

Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2012) 0.95

The contribution of head movement to the externalization and internalization of sounds. PLoS One (2013) 0.90

The effects of cueing temporal and spatial attention on word recognition in a complex listening task in hearing-impaired listeners. Trends Amplif (2008) 0.89

Level discrimination of speech sounds by hearing-impaired individuals with and without hearing amplification. Ear Hear (2011) 0.89

The impact of noise and hearing loss on the processing of simultaneous sentences. Ear Hear (2010) 0.89

A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale). Int J Audiol (2013) 0.88

Proposed norms for the Glasgow hearing-aid benefit profile (Ghabp) questionnaire. Int J Audiol (2014) 0.86

Self-assessed hearing abilities in middle- and older-age adults: a stratified sampling approach. Int J Audiol (2011) 0.86

Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2014) 0.86

Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients. Ear Hear (2011) 0.85

The effect of hearing impairment on localization dominance for single-word stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 0.84

Self-reported disability and handicap after hearing-aid fitting and benefit of hearing aids: comparison of fitting procedures, degree of hearing loss, experience with hearing aids and uni- and bilateral fittings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2008) 0.83

Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale. Ear Hear (2013) 0.82

Advantages of binaural amplification to acceptable noise level of directional hearing aid users. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol (2014) 0.81

Comparison of the benefits of cochlear implantation versus contra-lateral routing of signal hearing aids in adult patients with single-sided deafness: study protocol for a prospective within-subject longitudinal trial. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord (2014) 0.79

Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem. Trends Hear (2015) 0.79

The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting. Trends Amplif (2008) 0.78

Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study. Int J Audiol (2016) 0.78

Auditory reality and self-assessment of hearing. Trends Amplif (2008) 0.78

Auditory Spatial Discrimination and the Mismatch Negativity Response in Hearing-Impaired Individuals. PLoS One (2015) 0.75

Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids. Trends Hear (2016) 0.75

Stuart Gatehouse: a brief life. Trends Amplif (2008) 0.75

Partial Visual Loss Affects Self-reports of Hearing Abilities Measured Using a Modified Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire. Front Psychol (2017) 0.75

Brain state-triggered stimulus delivery: An efficient tool for probing ongoing brain activity. Open J Neurosci (2012) 0.75

Effects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Amplification on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review. Ear Hear (2017) 0.75

The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2015) 0.75

Bilateral use of active middle ear implants: speech discrimination results in noise. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2015) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. Int J Audiol (2004) 1.30

Informational masking in young and elderly listeners for speech masked by simultaneous speech and noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 1.18

The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 1.06

The Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory: a new instrument for assessing health-related benefit after an intervention. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (2004) 1.00

Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location. J Acoust Soc Am (2003) 0.97

Spatial hearing disability after acoustic neuroma removal. Laryngoscope (2007) 0.95

How appropriate is the OM6 as a discriminative instrument in children with otitis media? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2004) 0.86

The binaural performance of a cross-talk cancellation system with matched or mismatched setup and playback acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am (2007) 0.84

Localization and speech-identification ability of hearing-impaired listeners using phase-preserving amplification. Ear Hear (2005) 0.81

Does patient-perceived handicap correspond to the modified clinical test for the sensory interaction on balance? Otol Neurotol (2006) 0.79

Measuring quality of life in preschool children with sore throats and otitis media using the TAPQOL questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2005) 0.78

Discrimination of release time constants in hearing-aid compressors. Int J Audiol (2008) 0.78

The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting. Trends Amplif (2008) 0.78

Relation between change of hearing and (modified) Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap Score. Clin Otolaryngol (2005) 0.75