Published in BMJ on June 23, 2006
To opt in or opt out of electronic patient records? Electronic patient record is incompatible with confidentiality. BMJ (2006) 1.56
To opt in or opt out of electronic patient records? Poor training of locums in using hospital computer systems poses risk. BMJ (2006) 0.75
To opt in or opt out of electronic patient records? Analogy for soft paternalism in shared electronic records is flawed. BMJ (2006) 0.75
Keeping the NHS electronic spine on track. BMJ (2006) 1.45
Coming soon to a health sector near you: An advance look at the new Ontario Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA). Healthc Q (2004) 1.34
The recent Italian Consolidation Act on privacy: new measures for data protection. Med Law (2006) 1.33
Challenges associated with privacy in health care industry: implementation of HIPAA and the security rules. J Med Syst (2006) 1.33
The concept of precedent autonomy. Bioethics (2002) 1.26
Human genetic databases and liberty. Jurid Rev (2004) 1.19
Problems with prioritization: exploring ethical solutions to inequalities in HIV care. Am J Bioeth (2011) 4.03
Criteria for priority-setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders' values. Bull World Health Organ (2004) 2.30
[Ethical choices in medically futile treatment]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2008) 2.03
Using burden of disease information for health planning in developing countries: the experience from Uganda. Soc Sci Med (2003) 1.70
Human resources for emergency obstetric care in northern Tanzania: distribution of quantity or quality? Hum Resour Health (2005) 1.69
Availability, distribution and use of emergency obstetric care in northern Tanzania. Health Policy Plan (2005) 1.58
"Saying no is no easy matter" a qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 1.54
Public participation in health planning and priority setting at the district level in Uganda. Health Policy Plan (2003) 1.51
Should patients who use illicit drugs be offered a second heart-valve replacement? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2013) 1.46
Further benefits by early start of HIV treatment in low income countries: survival estimates of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Res Ther (2010) 1.43
Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda. Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2004) 1.36
Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda. Health Policy (2006) 1.35
Can cost-effectiveness analysis integrate concerns for equity? Systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2012) 1.29
Introduction of the patient-list system in general practice. Changes in Norwegian physicians' perception of their gatekeeper role. Scand J Prim Health Care (2003) 1.10
[Life-prolonging treatment--an analysis of two cases]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2007) 1.07
Combining evidence and values in priority setting: testing the balance sheet method in a low-income country. BMC Health Serv Res (2007) 1.01
[The challenges of subject criticism]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2013) 0.92
Distribution matters: equity considerations among health planners in Tanzania. Health Policy (2007) 0.90
HIV priorities and health distributions in a rural region in Tanzania: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics (2011) 0.88
Responsibility, fairness and rationing in health care. Health Policy (2005) 0.87
Whose priorities count? Comparison of community-identified health problems and Burden-of-Disease-assessed health priorities in a district in Uganda. Health Expect (2002) 0.86
My job is to keep him alive, but what about his brother and sister? How Indian doctors experience ethical dilemmas in neonatal medicine. Dev World Bioeth (2006) 0.85
Is the selection of patients for anti-retroviral treatment in Uganda fair? A qualitative study. Health Policy (2008) 0.81
Impact of ethics and economics on end-of-life decisions in an Indian neonatal unit. Pediatrics (2009) 0.81
Prioritizing child health interventions in Ethiopia: modeling impact on child mortality, life expectancy and inequality in age at death. PLoS One (2012) 0.81
Health inequalities in Ethiopia: modeling inequalities in length of life within and between population groups. Int J Equity Health (2013) 0.78
[Primary treatment of ovarian cancer]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2005) 0.78
When you can't have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors' priorities in complex choice situations. Soc Sci Med (2012) 0.78
Eliciting people's preferences for the distribution of health: A procedure for a more precise estimation of distributional weights. J Health Econ (2009) 0.77
A universal preference for equality in health? Reasons to reconsider properties of applied social welfare functions. Soc Sci Med (2012) 0.77
Rights to specialized health care in Norway: a normative perspective. J Law Med Ethics (2005) 0.77
Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting: quantification of the inherent trade-off. Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2014) 0.76
[Thiazides is still well-founded treatment]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2012) 0.75
A three-stage approach to measuring health inequalities and inequities. Int J Equity Health (2014) 0.75
Health as a human right. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2011) 0.75
[Solid guidelines for prevention of cardiovascular diseases]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2009) 0.75
[Does budget consequences control Norwegian reimbursement priorities?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2013) 0.75
Disease control priorities for neglected tropical diseases: lessons from priority ranking based on the quality of evidence, cost effectiveness, severity of disease, catastrophic health expenditures, and loss of productivity. Dev World Bioeth (2013) 0.75
[Seguro Popular--a health reform the the poorest]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2008) 0.75
Priorities in global health. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2011) 0.75
Physicians' use of guidelines and attitudes to withholding and withdrawing treatment for extremely premature neonates in Norway. Acta Paediatr (2007) 0.75
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2017) 0.75
[High-cost medicine--do we lack open and legitimate procedures for prioritising?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2009) 0.75