Published in Croat Med J on October 01, 2006
Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. JAMA (1999) 6.42
The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers. BMJ (1999) 4.16
The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality. JAMA (1999) 2.94
Teaching students how to read and write science: a mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Acad Med (2003) 2.79
Readability of British and American medical prose at the start of the 21st century. BMJ (2002) 2.71
Journal reading habits of internists. J Gen Intern Med (2000) 1.63
Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: an audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score. Crit Care Med (2005) 1.61
Developing an "evidence-based medicine and use of the biomedical literature" component as a longitudinal theme of an outcomes-based medical school curriculum: year 1. J Med Libr Assoc (2003) 1.10
Accuracy of abstracts for original research articles in pharmacy journals. Ann Pharmacother (2004) 1.09
Reading habits of practicing physiatrists. Am J Phys Med Rehabil (2002) 1.03
Producing a scientific journal in a small scientific community: an author-helpful policy. Int Microbiol (2004) 0.99
Reporting of numerical and statistical differences in abstracts: improving but not optimal. J Gen Intern Med (2002) 0.89
Effectiveness of a journal intervention to improve abstract quality. JAMA (2000) 0.88
Information management and reading habits of German diabetologists: a questionnaire survey. Diabetologia (2002) 0.85