Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.

PubWeight™: 1.01‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMC 2176183)

Published in Proc Biol Sci on May 22, 2007

Authors

Hanna Kokko1, Michael D Jennions, Anne Houde

Author Affiliations

1: Laboratory of Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), 00014 Helsinki, Finland. hanna.kokko@helsinki.fi

Articles cited by this

Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1981) 11.15

Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc (1997) 7.38

Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature (2001) 4.12

Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature (2002) 3.89

Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2006) 3.52

Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol (2005) 3.33

The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc Biol Sci (2001) 3.17

The sexual selection continuum. Proc Biol Sci (2002) 3.15

Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature (2000) 2.88

Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol (2004) 2.50

Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav (1999) 2.32

Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature (1999) 2.17

Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations. Nature (2006) 2.12

Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am Nat (2004) 2.04

Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution (2001) 1.91

Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature (2004) 1.78

Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. J Evol Biol (2003) 1.57

Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots. J Evol Biol (2003) 1.33

Possible role of female discrimination against 'redundant' males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies. Proc Biol Sci (2004) 1.27

Surprising evolutionary predictions from enhanced ecological realism. Theor Popul Biol (2006) 1.10

Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation. J Theor Biol (2006) 0.92

Frequency-dependent predation and maintenance of prey polymorphism. J Evol Biol (2006) 0.88

Species-level selection reduces selfishness through competitive exclusion. J Evol Biol (2007) 0.86

Frequency-dependent numerical dynamics in mosquitofish. Proc Biol Sci (2002) 0.86

Frequency-dependent selection: when being different makes you not stand out. Curr Biol (2006) 0.84

Runaway sexual selection with paternal transmission of the male trait and gene-culture determination of the female preference. Theor Popul Biol (2003) 0.81

Quantifying male attractiveness. Proc Biol Sci (2003) 0.80

Reciprocity: you have to think different. J Evol Biol (2006) 0.78

Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes. Evolution (2005) 0.78

Articles by these authors

The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends Ecol Evol (2006) 5.81

The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Biol Sci (2003) 4.44

Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol (2008) 4.36

High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature (2004) 2.79

Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. Am Nat (2005) 2.04

What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol Evol (2004) 1.81

H-index: age and sex make it unreliable. Nature (2007) 1.77

Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc (2011) 1.70

The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol (2005) 1.67

Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection. Evolution (2005) 1.62

Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild. Nature (2006) 1.60

Animal behaviour: coalition among male fiddler crabs. Nature (2004) 1.58

Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs. Curr Biol (2008) 1.58

Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus. Am Nat (2006) 1.53

Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 1.51

Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc (2011) 1.48

Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish. Proc Biol Sci (2003) 1.41

The many costs of sex. Trends Ecol Evol (2011) 1.24

Females prefer to associate with males with longer intromittent organs in mosquitofish. Biol Lett (2009) 1.22

The cost of reliable signaling: experimental evidence for predictable variation among males in a cost-benefit trade-off between sexually selected traits. Evolution (2009) 1.21

Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment. Ecol Lett (2012) 1.18

Sinister strategies succeed at the cricket World Cup. Proc Biol Sci (2004) 1.12

Data deposition: Fees could damage public data archives. Nature (2013) 1.11

When and why do territorial coalitions occur? Experimental evidence from a fiddler crab. Am Nat (2010) 1.06

Interspecific assistance: fiddler crabs help heterospecific neighbours in territory defence. Biol Lett (2010) 1.05

Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Genetics (2007) 1.04

Sexual conflict and cryptic female choice in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Evolution (2006) 0.99

Artificial selection on male longevity influences age-dependent reproductive effort in the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus. Am Nat (2006) 0.98

Adaptive sex allocation in anticipation of changes in offspring mating opportunities. Nat Commun (2013) 0.96

Human parental age difference and offspring count: and we still do not know what men or women want. Biol Lett (2008) 0.96

Inbreeding and advertisement calling in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus: laboratory and field experiments. Evolution (2010) 0.94

Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc (2013) 0.92

Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Genetica (2007) 0.92

Safe sex: male-female coalitions and pre-copulatory mate-guarding in a fiddler crab. Biol Lett (2009) 0.92

Sexual conflict: the battle of the sexes reversed. Curr Biol (2008) 0.86

No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets. PLoS One (2007) 0.85

Eavesdropping in crabs: an agency for lady detection. Biol Lett (2010) 0.85

Sex allocation, juvenile mortality and the costs imposed by offspring on parents and siblings. J Evol Biol (2015) 0.81

Do females preferentially associate with males given a better start in life? Biol Lett (2012) 0.81

Local gamete competition explains sex allocation and fertilization strategies in the sea. Am Nat (2014) 0.78

Keeping up appearances: male fiddler crabs wave faster in a crowd. Biol Lett (2011) 0.77

Sexual signaling and immune function in the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus. PLoS One (2012) 0.76

Causality and sex roles: prejudice against patterns? A reply to Ah-King. Trends Ecol Evol (2012) 0.76

Does male reproductive effort increase with age? Courtship in fiddler crabs. Biol Lett (2013) 0.75

Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science (2006) 0.75

Sexual selection: the weevils of inbreeding. Curr Biol (2010) 0.75

Shifts in Reproductive Investment in Response to Competitors Lower Male Reproductive Success. Am Nat (2020) 0.75