Published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol on April 23, 2007
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol (2011) 2.59
Systematic review of reviews of risk factors for intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology (2008) 1.23
Guidelines for the management of spontaneous preterm labor: identification of spontaneous preterm labor, diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preventive tools for preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med (2011) 1.02
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic serum biomarkers of colorectal cancer. PLoS One (2014) 0.89
Evidence for activation of Toll-like receptor and receptor for advanced glycation end products in preterm birth. Mediators Inflamm (2010) 0.88
Clinical application of surface plasmon resonance-based biosensors for fetal fibronectin detection. Sensors (Basel) (2012) 0.83
Factors associated with tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan: evidence from a population-based and longitudinal study from 1997 to 2004. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth (2009) 0.76
Big data and systematic reviews in nutritional epidemiology. Nutr Rev (2014) 0.76
A futuristic vision of pocket ultrasound machines: watch this space. Australas J Ultrasound Med (2015) 0.75
Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals. BMC Res Notes (2016) 0.75
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet (2002) 20.89
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ (2002) 19.50
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2009) 12.16
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 11.80
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev (2015) 11.05
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials (2012) 8.39
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2008) 5.85
Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med (2002) 5.35
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2005) 4.34
CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet (2008) 4.20
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2015) 3.74
An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet (2010) 3.12
Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2008) 3.09
Treatment success in cancer: new cancer treatment successes identified in phase 3 randomized controlled trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative oncology groups, 1955 to 2006. Arch Intern Med (2008) 3.07
Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Med (2009) 3.04
Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet (2010) 2.96
The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev (2012) 2.86
How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of health care interventions? ACP J Club (2003) 2.81
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol (2011) 2.59
Is evidence-based medicine relevant to the developing world? PLoS Med (2005) 2.50
How to formulate research recommendations. BMJ (2006) 2.38
Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs (2004) 2.07
Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures. Birth (2007) 2.03
Balancing benefits and harms in health care. BMJ (2003) 2.01
Commentary: the 1944 patulin trial: the first properly controlled multicentre trial conducted under the aegis of the British Medical Research Council. Int J Epidemiol (2004) 1.95
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 1.87
The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2009) 1.84
PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility. Syst Rev (2013) 1.83
Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth (2011) 1.80
Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.73
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups. Trials (2013) 1.69
Randomised controlled trials in Africa of HIV and AIDS: descriptive study and spatial distribution. BMJ (2005) 1.68
The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 1.68
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 1.67
Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews: an international consultation. PLoS One (2011) 1.66
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013. Trials (2014) 1.64
Sharing evidence on humanitarian relief. BMJ (2005) 1.56
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 1.55
STROBE: new standards for reporting observational epidemiology, a chance to improve. Int J Epidemiol (2007) 1.54
How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation. J Adv Nurs (2004) 1.50
Psychosocial interventions for the prevention of disability following traumatic physical injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 1.48
Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol (2012) 1.47
Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials (2013) 1.47
Sixteen-year single-surgeon experience with coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: recurrence rates and incidence of late rebleeding. Clinical article. J Neurosurg (2010) 1.46
The typical Cochrane review. How many trials? How many participants? Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2002) 1.45
Maternal and neonatal morbidity during off peak hours in a busy obstetric unit. Are deliveries after midnight more complicated? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (2013) 1.41
How important is the size of a reprint order? Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2003) 1.40
Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions. BMJ Open (2012) 1.33
How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? J Health Serv Res Policy (2007) 1.33
How the Cochrane collaboration is responding to the Asian tsunami. PLoS Med (2005) 1.30
Discussions of findings from a Cochrane review of midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women: continuity, normality and safety. Midwifery (2008) 1.28
Women's experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery (2007) 1.26
The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials (2014) 1.24
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis (2007) 1.24
Is evidence-based medicine relevant to the developing world?: Systematic reviews have yet to achieve their potential as a resource for practitioners in developing countries. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med (2005) 1.19
Interaction of St John's wort with conventional drugs: systematic review of clinical trials. BMJ (2004) 1.17
The use of systematic reviews and other research evidence in disasters and related areas: preliminary report of a needs assessment survey. PLoS Curr (2013) 1.15
The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials. Account Res (2004) 1.14
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 1.13
Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 1.13
Optimism bias leads to inconclusive results-an empirical study. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 1.12
Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 1.11
Methadone dose and neonatal abstinence syndrome-systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction (2010) 1.11
Visualization of evidence-based medicine domain knowledge: production and citation of Cochrane systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med (2013) 1.11
A grounded theory study of information preference and coping styles following antenatal diagnosis of foetal abnormality. J Adv Nurs (2008) 1.08
Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol (2006) 1.05
How outcomes are defined in clinical trials of mechanically ventilated adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2014) 1.05
Developing complex interventions for nursing: a critical review of key guidelines. J Clin Nurs (2013) 1.03
Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: women's encounters with caregivers. Birth (2007) 1.03
A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of randomised trials of interventions for preventing and treating preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2008) 1.03
Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported? Clin Trials (2005) 1.02
SWAT 1: what effects do site visits by the principal investigator have on recruitment in a multicentre randomized trial? J Evid Based Med (2013) 1.02
A metasynthesis of midwife-led care. Qual Health Res (2012) 1.01
Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 1.00
Reducing ineffective practice: challenges in identifying low-value health care using Cochrane systematic reviews. J Health Serv Res Policy (2013) 1.00
The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials. BMC Med Res Methodol (2013) 0.99
Recasting Hope: a process of adaptation following fetal anomaly diagnosis. Soc Sci Med (2008) 0.98
The sensitivity and precision of search terms in Phases I, II and III of the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy for identifying reports of randomized trials in medline in a specific area of health care--HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment interventions. Health Info Libr J (2007) 0.98
Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan. Midwifery (2006) 0.96
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2016) 0.95
'Not enough people to look after you': an exploration of women's experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland. Midwifery (2011) 0.95