Responsible oversight of human stem cell research: the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine's medical and ethical standards.

PubWeight™: 0.97‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMC 1858709)

Published in PLoS Med on May 01, 2007

Authors

Geoffrey P Lomax1, Zach W Hall, Bernard Lo

Author Affiliations

1: California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States of America. glomax@cirm.ca.gov

Articles by these authors

Who should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions. Ann Intern Med (2009) 5.35

Expanding the paradigm of the physician's role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework. Crit Care Med (2010) 3.54

The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res (2003) 3.48

The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med (2003) 3.35

Bioethics consultation in the private sector. Hastings Cent Rep (2002) 3.01

Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units. Crit Care Med (2007) 2.96

An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: Responding to Requests for Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2015) 2.86

New ISSCR guidelines underscore major principles for responsible translational stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell (2008) 2.61

Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers. Crit Care Med (2006) 2.61

Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2009) 2.46

Surrogate decision-makers' perspectives on discussing prognosis in the face of uncertainty. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2008) 2.40

"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis. Crit Care Med (2010) 2.25

Last-resort options for palliative sedation. Ann Intern Med (2009) 2.19

The roles and experiences of nonaffiliated and non-scientist members of institutional review boards. Acad Med (2003) 1.94

Strategies for culturally effective end-of-life care. Ann Intern Med (2002) 1.77

Clinical decision-making: Patients' preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns (2006) 1.67

Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it? J Gen Intern Med (2004) 1.63

Discussing overall prognosis with the very elderly. N Engl J Med (2011) 1.60

Obtaining consent for future research with induced pluripotent cells: opportunities and challenges. PLoS Biol (2009) 1.58

Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers. Ann Intern Med (2008) 1.54

A multicenter study of key stakeholders' perspectives on communicating with surrogates about prognosis in intensive care units. Ann Am Thorac Soc (2015) 1.46

Direct-to-consumer advertising: physicians' views of its effects on quality of care and the doctor-patient relationship. J Am Board Fam Pract (2004) 1.45

Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research. Ann Fam Med (2005) 1.44

Navigating language barriers under difficult circumstances. Ann Intern Med (2008) 1.32

The language of prognostication in intensive care units. Med Decis Making (2008) 1.29

The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research. Med Care (2002) 1.29

Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides? Ann Intern Med (2007) 1.27

Survey of u.s. Human research protection organizations: workload and membership. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2008) 1.26

Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials. IRB (2004) 1.24

Answers and questions about ethics consultations. JAMA (2003) 1.21

Direct-to-consumer advertising: public perceptions of its effects on health behaviors, health care, and the doctor-patient relationship. J Am Board Fam Pract (2004) 1.19

IRB Chairs' Perspectives on Genomics Research Involving Stored Biological Materials: Ethical Concerns and Proposed Solutions. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2008) 1.14

HPV vaccine and adolescents' sexual activity. BMJ (2006) 1.05

Clinical decision-making: physicians' preferences and experiences. BMC Fam Pract (2007) 1.05

Choices physicians would make if they were the parents of a child with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am J Cardiol (2003) 1.04

Survey of U.S. Boards that Review Mental Health-related Research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2008) 1.04

IRBs and ethically challenging protocols: views of IRB chairs about useful resources. IRB (2010) 1.00

'She gave it her best shot right away': patient experiences of biomedical and patient-centered communication. Patient Educ Couns (2005) 1.00

Medical students' experiences with medical errors: an analysis of medical student essays. Med Educ (2008) 0.95

The certificate of confidentiality application: a view from the NIH Institutes. IRB (2004) 0.95

Research Participants' Perceptions of the Certificate of Confidentiality's Assurances and Limitations. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics (2007) 0.94

Lessons from an HIV transmission pair. J Infect Dis (2007) 0.94

When previously expressed wishes conflict with best interests. JAMA Intern Med (2013) 0.92

Legal barriers to implementing recommendations for universal, routine prenatal HIV testing. J Law Med Ethics (2004) 0.91

Strengthening community consultation in critical care and emergency research. Crit Care Med (2006) 0.90

Clinical trial design issues raised during recombinant DNA advisory committee review of gene transfer protocols. Hum Gene Ther (2006) 0.89

Perceptions of conflict of interest disclosures among peer reviewers. PLoS One (2011) 0.88

How do patients view the role of the primary care physician in inpatient care? Dis Mon (2002) 0.87

Key clinical, ethical, and policy issues in the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of solid organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. Arch Intern Med (2003) 0.87

Informed consent for innovative surgery: a survey of patients and surgeons. Surgery (2012) 0.85

How pediatricians counsel parents when no "best-choice" management exists: lessons to be learned from hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (2004) 0.84

Acquisition, Analysis, and Sharing of Data in 2015 and Beyond: A Survey of the Landscape: A Conference Report From the American Heart Association Data Summit 2015. J Am Heart Assoc (2015) 0.84

An educational intervention to improve resident comfort with communication at the end of life. J Palliat Med (2012) 0.82

Pilot study demonstrating effectiveness of targeted education to improve informed consent understanding in AIDS clinical trials. AIDS Care (2011) 0.82

The end of therapeutic privilege? J Clin Ethics (2006) 0.82

Avoiding family feuds: responding to surrogate demands for life-sustaining interventions. J Law Med Ethics (1999) 0.81

Ethical challenge: when clinicians act as surrogates for unrepresented patients. Am J Crit Care (2012) 0.80

Human papillomavirus vaccination programmes. BMJ (2007) 0.80

How researchers define vulnerable populations in HIV/AIDS clinical trials. AIDS Behav (2010) 0.80

Medical journals and conflicts of interest. J Law Med Ethics (2012) 0.80

Ethical and policy implications of hospitalist systems. Dis Mon (2002) 0.79

Case 34-2010: A woman with an incorrect operation. N Engl J Med (2011) 0.78

Responding to incidental findings on research imaging studies: now what? Arch Intern Med (2010) 0.78

Retainer medicine: why not for all? Ann Intern Med (2011) 0.78

Establishing procedures for institutional oversight of stem cell research. Acad Med (2007) 0.78

Stem cell research: the California experience. J Neurosci (2006) 0.78

Consent: criteria should be drawn up for tissue donors. Nature (2009) 0.77

Directions in research on spiritual and religious isues for imprroving palliative care. Palliat Support Care (2003) 0.77

Informed consent in HIV research. Focus (2004) 0.76

Seriously ill hospitalized patients' perspectives on the benefits and harms of two models of hospital CPR discussions. Patient Educ Couns (2013) 0.75

The problem with actually tattooing DNR across your chest. J Gen Intern Med (2012) 0.75

Elder self-neglect--how can a physician help? N Engl J Med (2013) 0.75

Role of academic medical centers in cell-based therapeutic clinical trials. Transl Res (2011) 0.75

Placebo prescriptions are missed opportunities for doctor-patient communication. Am J Bioeth (2009) 0.75

Updating research oversight for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med (2014) 0.75

Futility: not just a medical issue. Law Med Health Care (1992) 0.75

Institutional review board guidance on pediatric research: missed opportunities. J Pediatr (2005) 0.75

Legal perceptions and medical decision making. Milbank Q (1986) 0.75

The care of the dying: a symposium on the case of Betty Wright -- Caring for incompetent patients: is there a physician on the case? Law Med Health Care (1989) 0.75

California dreaming? A new start for regenerative medicine in the Golden State. Interview with Dr. Zach Hall. Regen Med (2007) 0.75

Use of videos by directors of medical ethics courses. J Clin Ethics (2004) 0.75