Gender differences in the clinical management of patients with angina pectoris: a cross-sectional survey in primary care.

PubWeight™: 1.11‹?› | Rank: Top 10%

🔗 View Article (PMC 2034556)

Published in BMC Health Serv Res on September 04, 2007

Authors

Mike Crilly1, Peter Bundred, Xiyuan Hu, Lisa Leckey, Fiona Johnstone

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen Medical School, Polwarth Building at Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. mike.crilly@abdn.ac.uk

Articles citing this

Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci (2009) 3.68

Women and men with stable coronary artery disease have similar clinical outcomes: insights from the international prospective CLARIFY registry. Eur Heart J (2012) 2.30

Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice. J R Soc Med (2010) 1.01

Physician clinical information technology and health care disparities. Med Care Res Rev (2009) 0.95

Presentation, management, and outcomes of ischaemic heart disease in women. Nat Rev Cardiol (2013) 0.92

Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain. BMC Fam Pract (2011) 0.91

Physician cognitive processing as a source of diagnostic and treatment disparities in coronary heart disease: results of a factorial priming experiment. J Health Soc Behav (2010) 0.86

Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation (2016) 0.83

Use of exercise tests in primary care: importance for referral decisions and possible bias in the decision process; a prospective observational study. BMC Fam Pract (2014) 0.80

Does the use of an electronic reminder device with or without counseling improve adherence to lipid-lowering treatment? The results of a randomized controlled trial. Front Pharmacol (2013) 0.80

Ischemic heart disease and primary care: identifying gender-related differences. An observational study. BMC Fam Pract (2008) 0.79

Is stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis a safe option in ulcerative colitis patients with dysplasia or cancer? Int J Colorectal Dis (2009) 0.79

Articles cited by this

The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med (1999) 17.75

Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med (1991) 9.96

Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA (2003) 6.84

Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey. BMJ (2001) 6.32

Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. N Engl J Med (1991) 6.16

Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002. N Engl J Med (2005) 5.49

Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality. BMJ (1997) 4.11

Prevalence of angina as assessed by a survey of prescriptions for nitrates. Lancet (1988) 4.01

Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgment? Ann Intern Med (1992) 3.39

Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 3.25

Do women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as men? BMJ (1994) 2.70

Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med (1987) 2.66

Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina. Circulation (2006) 2.59

Sex disparities in treatment of cardiac risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2005) 2.45

Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism? Heart (2003) 2.20

Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA (2006) 2.16

Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias? Ann Intern Med (1992) 2.11

Use of statins in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: is treatment equitable? Heart (2002) 1.98

Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care? J Health Serv Res Policy (2000) 1.97

Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med (1994) 1.90

Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: a video-simulation experiment. Soc Sci Med (2005) 1.74

Hospital investigation of men and women treated for angina. BMJ (1995) 1.67

Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register. J Public Health Med (2003) 1.65

Evidence-based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina. Fam Pract (2001) 1.38

Prevalence, incidence, primary care burden and medical treatment of angina in Scotland: age, sex and socioeconomic disparities: a population-based study. Heart (2006) 1.19

Gender and age inequity in the provision of coronary revascularisation in England in the 1990s: is it getting better? Soc Sci Med (2004) 1.12

Evidence for inequalities in the management of coronary heart disease in Scotland. Heart (2005) 1.10

Gender differences in accessing cardiac surgery across England: a cross-sectional analysis of the health survey for England. Soc Sci Med (1998) 1.04

Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease. J Epidemiol Community Health (2002) 1.02

Gender differences in pain characteristics of chronic stable angina and perceived physical limitation in patients with coronary artery disease. Pain (2003) 0.95

Angina and cardiac care: are there gender differences, and if so, why? Circulation (2006) 0.94

The importance of validating the diagnosis of coronary heart disease when measuring secondary prevention: a cross-sectional study in general practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf (2002) 0.93

Repeated nitrate prescriptions as a potential marker for angina pectoris. A comparison with medical information from the Rotterdam Study. Pharm World Sci (2003) 0.90

Influence of sex on the use of cardiac procedures in patients presenting to the emergency department. A prospective multicenter study. Circulation (1996) 0.89

Sex bias in cardiovascular care: should women be treated more like men? JAMA (2000) 0.87

Gender differences in management after acute myocardial infarction: not 'sexism' but a reflection of age at presentation. J Public Health (Oxf) (2004) 0.86

Results of systematic review of research on diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease in women. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) (2003) 0.86

Gender inequalities in the management of angina pectoris: cross-sectional survey in primary care. Scott Med J (2005) 0.84

Gender differences in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial ischemia and infarction in England. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (1999) 0.82

Chronic stable angina and its treatment; why Cinderella never gets to the ball? Int J Cardiol (2001) 0.81

Gender differences associated with physical functioning in older persons with angina. Disabil Rehabil (2003) 0.77

Sex differences in morphology of coronary artery plaque assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Coron Artery Dis (2001) 0.77

Sex differences in plaque morphology may explain the higher male prevalence of myocardial infarction compared to angina pectoris. The Tromsø Study. Scand Cardiovasc J (2005) 0.77