Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output using a novel measurement and analysis method.

PubWeight™: 1.00‹?› | Rank: Top 15%

🔗 View Article (PMID 17992808)

Published in Biomed Instrum Technol on November 12, 2007

Authors

Benjamin Pratt1, Luchy Roteliuk, Feras Hatib, John Frazier, Roy D Wallen

Author Affiliations

1: Edwards Lifesciences LLP, Irvine, CA 92614, USA. benjamin_pratt@edwards.com

Articles citing this

Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med (2010) 1.77

Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care (2010) 1.35

Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial. Crit Care (2007) 1.09

Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used? Crit Care (2013) 0.89

Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock. J Clin Monit Comput (2015) 0.81

Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock. J Clin Monit Comput (2012) 0.81

Stroke volume variation obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac™ system during bleeding and fluid overload in dogs. J Anesth (2011) 0.80

Impact of bypass flow rate and catheter position in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on gas exchange in vivo. J Artif Organs (2014) 0.76

A comparison of third-generation semi-invasive arterial waveform analysis with thermodilution in patients undergoing coronary surgery. ScientificWorldJournal (2012) 0.76

Reliability of a new 4th generation FloTrac algorithm to track cardiac output changes in patients receiving phenylephrine. J Clin Monit Comput (2014) 0.76

Fluid responsiveness prediction using Vigileo FloTrac measured cardiac output changes during passive leg raise test. J Intensive Care (2016) 0.75