Published in J Arthroplasty on January 01, 2008
Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 2.19
Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop (2014) 2.03
Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 1.82
Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 1.52
Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 1.47
Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop (2008) 1.36
Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 1.22
Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.20
Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 1.13
Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides? Int Orthop (2012) 1.09
Patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop (2014) 1.06
Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments. Int Orthop (2012) 1.04
No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 1.04
A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop (2013) 1.00
Surgical technique: Computer-generated custom jigs improve accuracy of wide resection of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 0.95
Accuracy of patient specific cutting blocks in total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int (2014) 0.80
Evolution of customization design for total knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2012) 0.78
Accuracy of Individualized Custom Tibial Cutting Guides in UKA. HSS J (2014) 0.78
Patient-matched instruments versus standard instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. Wien Klin Wochenschr (2015) 0.76
Computerized tomography based "patient specific blocks" improve postoperative mechanical alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop (2016) 0.75
700 OtisKnees with Stryker Triathlon components. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.75
Numerical optimization of alignment reproducibility for customizable surgical guides. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (2015) 0.75
What mechanisms are associated with tibial component failure after kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop (2017) 0.75
Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2002) 5.19
Transforming growth factor-beta-mediated chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal progenitor cells involves N-cadherin and mitogen-activated protein kinase and Wnt signaling cross-talk. J Biol Chem (2003) 2.25
Operating room traffic is a major concern during total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 2.18
Modular taper junction corrosion and failure: how to approach a recalled total hip arthroplasty implant. J Arthroplasty (2013) 2.13
Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 2.09
Total joint arthroplasty: When do fatal or near-fatal complications occur? J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 2.07
Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2010) 2.03
The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005) 1.95
Characterization of multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells derived from human trabecular bone. Stem Cells (2003) 1.82
Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 1.81
Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.69
In hospital complications after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2008) 1.69
The 2012 Chitranjan Ranawat award: intraarticular analgesia after TKA reduces pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 1.58
Ninety-day mortality after bilateral hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2006) 1.54
The noisy ceramic hip: is component malpositioning the cause? J Arthroplasty (2008) 1.53
Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop (2010) 1.53
Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 1.50
Irrigation and debridement in the management of prosthetic joint infection: traditional indications revisited. J Arthroplasty (2010) 1.47
Periprosthetic infection due to resistant staphylococci: serious problems on the horizon. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2009) 1.46
Does "excessive" anticoagulation predispose to periprosthetic infection? J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.45
Low-Dose Aspirin Is Effective Chemoprophylaxis Against Clinically Important Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2017) 1.44
In vivo degradation of polyethylene liners after gamma sterilization in air. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005) 1.43
Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: a long-term study of the Taperloc stem. J Arthroplasty (2004) 1.38
Squeaking hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 1.36
Mark B. Coventry Award: synovial C-reactive protein: a prospective evaluation of a molecular marker for periprosthetic knee joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 1.25
Frank Stinchfield Award. Titanium surface with biologic activity against infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 1.25
The effect of stem design on the prevalence of squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2010) 1.24
2006 Otto Aufranc Award Paper: significance of in vivo degradation for polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.23
Passing the Boards: can USMLE and Orthopaedic in-Training Examination scores predict passage of the ABOS Part-I examination? J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 1.22
Prosthetic joint infection caused by gram-negative organisms. J Arthroplasty (2011) 1.22
Complications associated with reimplantation after girdlestone arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003) 1.21
Renal impairment following total joint arthroplasty: who is at risk? J Arthroplasty (2010) 1.18
Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.16
Mechanical properties, oxidation, and clinical performance of retrieved highly cross-linked Crossfire liners after intermediate-term implantation. J Arthroplasty (2009) 1.14
Gamma inert sterilization: a solution to polyethylene oxidation? J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) 1.13
The effect of malnutrition on patients undergoing elective joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2013) 1.12
Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 1.12
Revision hip arthroplasty for late instability secondary to polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.10
Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty (2006) 1.10
Natural history of squeaking after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 1.09
Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2003) 1.09
Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.09
A simple, high-yield method for obtaining multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells from trabecular bone. Mol Biotechnol (2003) 1.07
Return to athletic activity after total hip arthroplasty. Consensus guidelines based on a survey of the Hip Society and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty (2007) 1.07
Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am (2009) 1.06
Ten to fifteen-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty with a tapered cobalt-chromium femoral component (tri-lock) inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 1.05
Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients less than twenty-years. Acta Orthop Belg (2008) 1.03
Bilateral total hip arthroplasty: one-stage versus two-stage procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 1.02
Prospective matched-pair analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 1.01
Outcome of one-stage cementless exchange for acute postoperative periprosthetic hip infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 0.99
A double offset broach handle for preparation of the femoral cavity in minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2006) 0.99
Proximal femoral replacement in patients with non-neoplastic conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 0.97
Revision total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. A case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 0.97
Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005) 0.96
Has the rate of in-hospital infections after total joint arthroplasty decreased? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 0.96
Internet promotion of minimally invasive surgery and computer-assisted orthopedic surgery in total knee arthroplasty by members of American Association Of Hip And Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty (2007) 0.96
Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013) 0.96
Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010) 0.95
Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty early dislocation rate. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2007) 0.95
Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: better than a fixed-bearing? J Arthroplasty (2009) 0.94
Five Duraloc locking ring failures. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.94
Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (2013) 0.93
Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011) 0.93
Relationship between surgical volume and early outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: do results continue to get better? J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.92
Recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty: beware of subtle component malpositioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 0.92
Periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis: a complete understanding of white blood cell count and differential. J Arthroplasty (2012) 0.92
Isolated acetabular polyethylene exchange through the anterolateral approach. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.91
Revision knee arthroplasty for bone loss: choosing the right degree of constraint. J Arthroplasty (2013) 0.91
Spinal anesthesia: should everyone receive a urinary catheter?: a randomized, prospective study of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2013) 0.91
The assessment of intraoperative prosthetic knee range of motion using two methods. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.90
Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg (2014) 0.90
Perioperative morbidity and mortality following bilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2013) 0.89
Total joint arthroplasty in patients with hepatitis C. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011) 0.89
Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004) 0.88
A prospective evaluation of 2 different pain management protocols for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.88
Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 0.87
One-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty compared with unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Arthroplasty (2006) 0.87
One-stage bilateral total joint arthroplasty: a prospective, comparative study of total hip and total knee replacement. Orthopedics (2008) 0.86
Isolated polyethylene exchange versus acetabular revision for polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 0.86
Is deep vein thrombosis a good proxy for pulmonary embolus? J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.86
Femoral perforation complicating contemporary uncemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2006) 0.85
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) 0.84
Accuracy of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation. Comput Aided Surg (2008) 0.83
Aspirin: an alternative for pulmonary embolism prophylaxis after arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2014) 0.83
Surgical care improvement project (SCIP): has its mission succeeded? J Arthroplasty (2013) 0.83
The effect of tibial polyethylene insert design on range of motion: evaluation of in vivo knee kinematics by a computerized navigation system during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.83
Revision of the unstable total knee arthroplasty: outcome predictors. J Arthroplasty (2011) 0.83
Late sciatic nerve palsy caused by hematoma after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.83
Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty does the anterior knee pain resolve? J Arthroplasty (2011) 0.83
A prospective analysis of glove perforation in primary and revision total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2012) 0.83
Bilateral knee periprosthetic infection with Mycobacterium fortuitum. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.82
In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion posterior stabilized fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee-bending motion. J Arthroplasty (2008) 0.82
Total hip arthroplasty after prior surgical treatment of hip fracture is it always challenging? J Arthroplasty (2011) 0.82
Cementless femoral reconstruction in patients with proximal femoral deformity. J Arthroplasty (2010) 0.82