Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

PubWeight™: 2.31‹?› | Rank: Top 2%

🔗 View Article (PMC 2752329)

Published in J Neurosci on March 12, 2008

Authors

Jun Izawa1, Tushar Rane, Opher Donchin, Reza Shadmehr

Author Affiliations

1: Laboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. jizawa@jhu.edu

Articles citing this

Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control. PLoS Biol (2009) 4.46

Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains. Curr Biol (2011) 2.35

Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci (2008) 2.28

Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol (2011) 2.20

Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. J Neurophysiol (2010) 2.19

The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn Sci (2009) 2.03

Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol (2008) 1.97

Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil (2009) 1.95

Learning optimal adaptation strategies in unpredictable motor tasks. J Neurosci (2009) 1.66

Temporal discounting of reward and the cost of time in motor control. J Neurosci (2010) 1.30

Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom. PLoS Comput Biol (2009) 1.29

On-line processing of uncertain information in visuomotor control. J Neurosci (2008) 1.27

Risk-sensitive optimal feedback control accounts for sensorimotor behavior under uncertainty. PLoS Comput Biol (2010) 1.23

Motor learning relies on integrated sensory inputs in ADHD, but over-selectively on proprioception in autism spectrum conditions. Autism Res (2012) 1.22

Risk-sensitivity in sensorimotor control. Front Hum Neurosci (2011) 1.20

A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol (2011) 1.19

Changes in control of saccades during gain adaptation. J Neurosci (2008) 1.16

Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals. Exp Brain Res (2009) 1.14

Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule. Cereb Cortex (2010) 1.13

Computational Models for Neuromuscular Function. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng (2009) 1.13

Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics. J Neurosci (2012) 1.12

Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories. Neuroimage (2014) 1.12

Consensus: "Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?" Brain Stimul (2008) 1.10

Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics. J Neurophysiol (2012) 1.05

Generalization of motor adaptation to repeated-slip perturbation across tasks. Neuroscience (2011) 1.03

Risk-sensitivity and the mean-variance trade-off: decision making in sensorimotor control. Proc Biol Sci (2011) 1.01

Multisensory integration in dynamical behaviors: maximum likelihood estimation across bimanual skill learning. J Neurosci (2009) 0.98

Inferring visuomotor priors for sensorimotor learning. PLoS Comput Biol (2011) 0.98

Flexible Control of Safety Margins for Action Based on Environmental Variability. J Neurosci (2015) 0.96

Review and perspective: neuromechanical considerations for predicting muscle activation patterns for movement. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng (2012) 0.95

Cerebellar motor learning: are environment dynamics more important than error size? J Neurophysiol (2013) 0.95

A sensorimotor paradigm for Bayesian model selection. Front Hum Neurosci (2012) 0.94

A computational model of limb impedance control based on principles of internal model uncertainty. PLoS One (2010) 0.94

Differences in context and feedback result in different trajectories and adaptation strategies in reaching. PLoS One (2009) 0.93

Risk sensitivity in a motor task with speed-accuracy trade-off. J Neurophysiol (2011) 0.92

Spinal cord modularity: evolution, development, and optimization and the possible relevance to low back pain in man. Exp Brain Res (2009) 0.91

Priors engaged in long-latency responses to mechanical perturbations suggest a rapid update in state estimation. PLoS Comput Biol (2013) 0.91

Unsupervised adaptation of brain-machine interface decoders. Front Neurosci (2012) 0.90

The temporal structure of vertical arm movements. PLoS One (2011) 0.87

Risk-sensitivity in Bayesian sensorimotor integration. PLoS Comput Biol (2012) 0.84

Correlations in state space can cause sub-optimal adaptation of optimal feedback control models. J Comput Neurosci (2011) 0.83

Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation. J Neurophysiol (2013) 0.83

Trial-to-trial reoptimization of motor behavior due to changes in task demands is limited. PLoS One (2013) 0.83

Passive motion paradigm: an alternative to optimal control. Front Neurorobot (2011) 0.82

Stabilization strategies for unstable dynamics. PLoS One (2012) 0.82

Do muscle synergies reduce the dimensionality of behavior? Front Comput Neurosci (2014) 0.81

Task goals influence online corrections and adaptation of reaching movements. J Neurophysiol (2011) 0.81

An examination of the generalizability of motor costs. PLoS One (2013) 0.81

Movement variability near goal equivalent manifolds: fluctuations, control, and model-based analysis. Hum Mov Sci (2013) 0.81

A review of intentional and cognitive control in autism. Front Psychol (2012) 0.81

Consensus Paper: Towards a Systems-Level View of Cerebellar Function: the Interplay Between Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Cortex. Cerebellum (2017) 0.80

Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act. Elife (2017) 0.80

Optimizing effort: increased efficiency of motor memory with time away from practice. J Neurophysiol (2014) 0.79

Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals. PLoS One (2012) 0.79

Modulation of neural activity by reward in medial intraparietal cortex is sensitive to temporal sequence of reward. J Neurophysiol (2014) 0.78

Locomotor control of limb force switches from minimal intervention principle in early adaptation to noise reduction in late adaptation. J Neurophysiol (2014) 0.78

Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference. PLoS One (2015) 0.78

Fractionation of the visuomotor feedback response to directions of movement and perturbation. J Neurophysiol (2014) 0.78

Bouncing between model and data: stability, passivity, and optimality in hybrid dynamics. J Mot Behav (2010) 0.78

Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force field reaching adaptation. J Neurophysiol (2017) 0.78

Financial incentives enhance adaptation to a sensorimotor transformation. Exp Brain Res (2016) 0.77

Chunking as the result of an efficiency computation trade-off. Nat Commun (2016) 0.77

Error-enhancing robot therapy to induce motor control improvement in childhood onset primary dystonia. J Neuroeng Rehabil (2012) 0.77

Expressions of multiple neuronal dynamics during sensorimotor learning in the motor cortex of behaving monkeys. PLoS One (2011) 0.77

Direction-dependent arm kinematics reveal optimal integration of gravity cues. Elife (2016) 0.76

Human motor adaptation in whole body motion. Sci Rep (2016) 0.76

'Syntactic Perturbation' During Production Activates the Right IFG, but not Broca's Area or the ATL. Front Psychol (2016) 0.75

A Computational Model for Aperture Control in Reach-to-Grasp Movement Based on Predictive Variability. Front Comput Neurosci (2015) 0.75

Implicit Timing as the Missing Link between Neurobiological and Self Disorders in Schizophrenia? Front Hum Neurosci (2016) 0.75

Optimal control of reaching is disturbed in complex regional pain syndrome: a single-case study. J Pain Res (2017) 0.75

Time-integrated position error accounts for sensorimotor behavior in time-constrained tasks. PLoS One (2012) 0.75

Mini-max feedback control as a computational theory of sensorimotor control in the presence of structural uncertainty. Front Comput Neurosci (2014) 0.75

Multi-Trial Gait Adaptation of Healthy Individuals during Visual Kinematic Perturbations. Front Hum Neurosci (2017) 0.75

Optimal feedback control to describe multiple representations of primary motor cortex neurons. J Comput Neurosci (2017) 0.75

Articles cited by this

A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science (1997) 31.30

Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci (1994) 11.84

Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci (2002) 11.57

The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol (1954) 9.76

Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons. Science (2003) 9.54

Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature (1998) 9.47

Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol (2006) 6.69

Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature (2000) 6.37

Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model. Biol Cybern (1989) 4.17

Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci (2003) 3.65

Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol (2000) 3.50

The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature (2001) 3.48

Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol (2004) 3.27

Why don't we move faster? Parkinson's disease, movement vigor, and implicit motivation. J Neurosci (2007) 3.14

Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol (2002) 2.97

The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol (2003) 2.59

Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. J Neurophysiol (2003) 2.26

Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr Biol (2007) 2.23

Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensorimotor system. Neural Comput (2005) 2.16

Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. J Neurophysiol (2007) 1.81

A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics. PLoS Biol (2003) 1.70

Internal models of limb dynamics and the encoding of limb state. J Neural Eng (2005) 1.49

Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields. Exp Brain Res (2005) 1.38

Effects of human cerebellar thalamus disruption on adaptive control of reaching. Cereb Cortex (2005) 1.28

Procedural motor learning in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res (2001) 1.20

Internal models and contextual cues: encoding serial order and direction of movement. J Neurophysiol (2004) 1.15

Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses. Biol Cybern (2001) 1.09

Near-optimal human adaptive control across different noise environments. J Neurosci (2006) 1.07

Influence of viscous loads on motor planning. J Neurophysiol (2007) 0.92

Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force. J Neurophysiol (2005) 0.91

Articles by these authors

Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol (2006) 6.69

Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol (2007) 4.31

Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci (2003) 3.65

Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci (2005) 3.40

Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol (2004) 3.27

The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nat Neurosci (2007) 3.11

Adaptive control of saccades via internal feedback. J Neurosci (2008) 2.89

Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action. PLoS Biol (2006) 2.55

Consolidation of motor memory. Trends Neurosci (2005) 2.37

Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol (2011) 2.20

Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. J Neurophysiol (2010) 2.19

Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol (2003) 2.14

Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? J Neurophysiol (2008) 2.09

Detecting and adjusting for artifacts in fMRI time series data. Neuroimage (2005) 2.09

The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn Sci (2009) 2.03

Impairment of retention but not acquisition of a visuomotor skill through time-dependent disruption of primary motor cortex. J Neurosci (2007) 1.77

Cerebellar contributions to reach adaptation and learning sensory consequences of action. J Neurosci (2012) 1.73

Representation of internal models of action in the autistic brain. Nat Neurosci (2009) 1.72

A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics. PLoS Biol (2003) 1.70

Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans. J Neurosci (2009) 1.69

Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event. J Neurophysiol (2009) 1.60

Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation. J Neurophysiol (2008) 1.59

Consolidation patterns of human motor memory. J Neurosci (2008) 1.59

Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching. Exp Brain Res (2006) 1.51

Internal models of limb dynamics and the encoding of limb state. J Neural Eng (2005) 1.49

Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback. J Neurosci (2006) 1.45

Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields. Exp Brain Res (2005) 1.38

A shared resource between declarative memory and motor memory. J Neurosci (2010) 1.37

Protection and expression of human motor memories. J Neurosci (2011) 1.36

The intrinsic value of visual information affects saccade velocities. Exp Brain Res (2009) 1.32

Pausing purkinje cells in the cerebellum of the awake cat. Front Syst Neurosci (2009) 1.32

Effects of human cerebellar thalamus disruption on adaptive control of reaching. Cereb Cortex (2005) 1.28

On-line processing of uncertain information in visuomotor control. J Neurosci (2008) 1.27

Dissociating timing and coordination as functions of the cerebellum. J Neurosci (2007) 1.25

Mechanisms influencing acquisition and recall of motor memories. J Neurophysiol (2002) 1.23

A real-time state predictor in motor control: study of saccadic eye movements during unseen reaching movements. J Neurosci (2002) 1.23

Motor learning relies on integrated sensory inputs in ADHD, but over-selectively on proprioception in autism spectrum conditions. Autism Res (2012) 1.22

Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. J Neurophysiol (2012) 1.18

Changes in control of saccades during gain adaptation. J Neurosci (2008) 1.16

Evolution of motor memory during the seconds after observation of motor error. J Neurophysiol (2007) 1.15

Internal models and contextual cues: encoding serial order and direction of movement. J Neurophysiol (2004) 1.15

Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule. Cereb Cortex (2010) 1.13

Stimulation of the human motor cortex alters generalization patterns of motor learning. J Neurosci (2011) 1.10

Evidence for hyperbolic temporal discounting of reward in control of movements. J Neurosci (2012) 1.09

Acquisition of internal models of motor tasks in children with autism. Brain (2008) 1.01

Preparing to reach: selecting an adaptive long-latency feedback controller. J Neurosci (2012) 0.97

Decay of motor memories in the absence of error. J Neurosci (2013) 0.95

Active learning: learning a motor skill without a coach. J Neurophysiol (2008) 0.95

Changes in corticospinal excitability during reach adaptation in force fields. J Neurophysiol (2012) 0.90

Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements. Front Cell Neurosci (2009) 0.89

Some perspectives on saccade adaptation. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2009) 0.88

TMS perturbs saccade trajectories and unmasks an internal feedback controller for saccades. J Neurosci (2011) 0.87

Motor costs and the coordination of the two arms. J Neurosci (2014) 0.86

Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control. Exp Brain Res (2014) 0.86

Towards a computational neuropsychology of action. Prog Brain Res (2007) 0.85

Vigor of movements and the cost of time in decision making. J Neurosci (2014) 0.83

Correlations in state space can cause sub-optimal adaptation of optimal feedback control models. J Comput Neurosci (2011) 0.83

Saccade adaptation in response to altered arm dynamics. J Neurophysiol (2003) 0.83

Into the square and out of the box: the effects of Quadrato Motor Training on creativity and alpha coherence. PLoS One (2013) 0.80

Deficient use of visual information in estimating hand position in cerebellar patients. J Neurosci (2012) 0.79

Visual receptive field properties of cells in the optic tectum of the archer fish. J Neurophysiol (2013) 0.78

Sequential neural changes during motor learning in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res (2008) 0.78

Archer fish fast hunting maneuver may be guided by directionally selective retinal ganglion cells. Eur J Neurosci (2012) 0.78

Structural correlates of motor adaptation deficits in patients with acute focal lesions of the cerebellum. Exp Brain Res (2014) 0.78

Effects of deep brain stimulation on adaptive control of reaching. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (2005) 0.76

Use of technology in follow-up of HIV positive pregnant women and their babies till 18 months of age- an innovation by Maharashtra State AIDS Control Society (MSACS), India. Curr Opin HIV AIDS (2016) 0.75