Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis.

PubWeight™: 2.41‹?› | Rank: Top 2%

🔗 View Article (PMID 18508977)

Published in Am J Sports Med on May 28, 2008

Authors

Richard B Meredick1, Kennan J Vance, David Appleby, James H Lubowitz

Author Affiliations

1: Taos Orthopaedic Institute Research Foundation, Taos, NM 87571, USA.

Articles citing this

The biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med (2015) 2.91

Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Int Orthop (2012) 2.14

Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up. Int Orthop (2010) 1.48

The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop (2013) 1.24

A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop (2010) 1.14

Basic science of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair. Bone Joint Res (2014) 1.11

Clinical results comparing transtibial technique and outside in technique in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res (2013) 1.05

Arthroscopic Identification of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee. Arthrosc Tech (2014) 1.04

Guideline on anterior cruciate ligament injury. Acta Orthop (2012) 1.03

Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop (2012) 0.97

Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces. Am J Sports Med (2010) 0.97

Does Combined Intra- and Extraarticular ACL Reconstruction Improve Function and Stability? A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 0.96

Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices. Sports Health (2012) 0.92

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of literature. Int Orthop (2012) 0.90

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY: TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION. CURRENT PERSPECTIVES AND TRENDS. Rev Bras Ortop (2015) 0.89

Prognosis and predictors of ACL reconstructions using the MOON cohort: a model for comparative effectiveness studies. J Orthop Res (2012) 0.89

Single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year followup? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 0.88

The Kinematic Basis of ACL Reconstruction. Oper Tech Sports Med (2008) 0.86

Comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after a minimum of 3-year follow-up: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Clin Exp Med (2015) 0.85

Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2011) 0.84

Function and strain of the anterolateral ligament part I: biomechanical analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2017) 0.84

Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Current Concepts and Future Perspective. Cartilage (2013) 0.83

Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on in vivo, dynamic knee function. Clin Sports Med (2013) 0.83

The Lateral Meniscus as a Guide to Anatomical Tibial Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Open Orthop J (2015) 0.83

Kinematic Analysis of Five Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques. Knee Surg Relat Res (2015) 0.82

A quantitative technique to create a femoral tunnel at the averaged center of the anteromedial bundle attachment in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2013) 0.80

Single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomical placement of hamstring tendon graft: can it restore normal knee joint kinematics? Am J Sports Med (2010) 0.80

Re: Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med (2009) 0.80

Three-dimensional anatomic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament for planning reconstruction. Anat Res Int (2011) 0.79

Step-by-Step Arthroscopic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Using Anatomic Landmarks. Arthrosc Tech (2015) 0.79

In vitro and intraoperative laxities after single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy (2011) 0.78

Combined anterior and rotational laxity measurements allow characterizing personal knee laxity profiles in healthy individuals. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014) 0.78

The evolution of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Open Orthop J (2012) 0.78

A novel tool for objective assessment of femorotibial rotation: a cadaver study. Int Orthop (2010) 0.78

No difference at two years between all inside transtibial technique and traditional transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J (2014) 0.77

A matched pairs comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, clinical results and manual laxity testing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2011) 0.77

Kinematics of Rotation in Joints of the Lower Limbs and Pelvis during Gait: Early Results-SB ACLR Approach versus DB ACLR Approach. Biomed Res Int (2015) 0.77

MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings. Skeletal Radiol (2011) 0.77

Recent evolution of cruciate ligament surgery of the knee. Clin Orthop Surg (2012) 0.76

Electromagnetic tracking of the pivot-shift. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2016) 0.75

Arthroscopic anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience with follow-up of 4 years. J Clin Orthop Trauma (2015) 0.75

A prospective study to evaluate the clinico-radiological outcomes of arthroscopic single bundle versus double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Clin Orthop Trauma (2016) 0.75

Application of a computerised navigation technique to assist arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop (2013) 0.75

The concept of double bundle ACL simulation with a single bundle patellar tendon graft. A cadaveric feasibility study. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol (2012) 0.75

A tale of 10 European centres - 2010 APOSSM travelling fellowship review in ACL surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol (2012) 0.75

Evidence-Based ACL Reconstruction. Arch Bone Jt Surg (2015) 0.75

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: principles of treatment. EFORT Open Rev (2017) 0.75

A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Orthop J Sports Med (2016) 0.75

The function of the human anterior cruciate ligament and analysis of single- and double-bundle graft reconstructions. Sports Health (2009) 0.75

Kinematics of ACL and anterolateral ligament. Part II: anterolateral and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2017) 0.75

Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: What's In and What's Out? Indian J Orthop (2017) 0.75

Combined Anatomic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate and Anterolateral Ligaments Using Hamstring Graft Through a Single Femoral Tunnel and With a Single Femoral Fixation. Arthrosc Tech (2017) 0.75

Articles by these authors

The utility of bladder catheterization in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2005) 2.20

Prompt operative intervention reduces long-term osteoarthritis after knee anterior cruciate ligament tear. Arthroscopy (2011) 2.10

Could the New England Journal of Medicine be biased against arthroscopic knee surgery? Part 2. Arthroscopy (2014) 2.03

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts. Arthroscopy (2013) 2.03

Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy (2006) 1.94

Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy (2012) 1.89

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the most common orthopaedic surgery procedures: knee arthroscopy and knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy (2011) 1.70

What, if any, are the indications for arthroscopic debridement of the osteoarthritic knee? Arthroscopy (2006) 1.53

Hip arthroscopy: an emerging gold standard. Arthroscopy (2006) 1.51

Impact of cost reduction programs on short-term patient outcome and hospital cost of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 1.51

A modest proposal for a clinical trial on single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy (2012) 1.46

Do basic science articles have clinical relevance? Arthroscopy (2008) 1.45

AAOS rotator cuff clinical practice guideline misses the mark. Arthroscopy (2012) 1.43

Editorial Commentary: Hamstring Tendon Regeneration After Autograft Harvest. Arthroscopy (2015) 1.40

Controversy in Arthroscopy: bring it on. Arthroscopy (2010) 1.39

Who among us should perform arthroscopic surgery of the hip? Arthroscopy (2009) 1.38

Let's go to the video. Arthroscopy (2009) 1.38

Congratulations and condemnations: Level I Evidence prize for femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction, and AAOS clinical practice guidelines miss the mark-again. Arthroscopy (2014) 1.28

Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy (2013) 1.12

Does arthroscopic partial meniscectomy result in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review with a minimum of 8 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy (2010) 1.12

Editors' note. Arthroscopy (2011) 1.07

Single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: the controversy continues. Arthroscopy (2011) 1.07

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Arthroscopy (2008) 1.06

Video informed consent improves knee arthroscopy patient comprehension. Arthroscopy (2005) 1.03

Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: complications and innovations. Arthroscopy (2015) 1.01

Lateral trochanteric pain following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2006) 1.00

Minimally invasive posterior hamstring harvest. Arthrosc Tech (2013) 0.96

Anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy (2012) 0.94

The knee anterolateral ligament. Arthroscopy (2014) 0.93

Limitations and sources of bias in clinical knee cartilage research. Arthroscopy (2012) 0.92

The relationship between the outcome of studies of autologous chondrocyte implantation and the presence of commercial funding. Am J Sports Med (2007) 0.91

The superior-medial shoulder arthroscopy portal is safe. Arthroscopy (2007) 0.88

Could the new England journal of medicine be biased against arthroscopic knee surgery? Arthroscopy (2014) 0.88

Shoulder, hip, knee, and PRP. Arthroscopy (2010) 0.88

Minimally invasive surgery-total knee arthroplasty. Arthroscopy (2004) 0.88

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the learning curve. Arthroscopy (2005) 0.88

Cost-effectiveness analysis of primary arthroscopic stabilization versus nonoperative treatment for first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocations. Arthroscopy (2012) 0.86

All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome. J Arthroplasty (2003) 0.85

Save the meniscus. Arthroscopy (2011) 0.84

Hip arthroscopy in patients with early arthritis. Arthroscopy (2012) 0.84

Evaluation of the porous-coated anatomic hip at 12 years. J Arthroplasty (2002) 0.84

Two on the fast track: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression with coracoacromial ligament excision. Arthroscopy (2009) 0.84

Interference screw technique for arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation of compression fractures of the tibial plateau. Arthroscopy (2006) 0.83

Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med (2002) 0.82

Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014) 0.82

Minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty: the learning curve. Orthopedics (2007) 0.82

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years or older: an expected-value decision analysis. Arthroscopy (2008) 0.81

Ex vivo comparison of mechanical versus thermal chondroplasty: assessment of tissue effect at the surgical endpoint. Arthroscopy (2008) 0.81

A practical guide to research: design, execution, and publication. Arthroscopy (2011) 0.81

Editorial commentary: synthetic ACL grafts are more important than clinical nonbelievers may realize. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.80

Continuous infusion of a local anesthetic versus interscalene block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy (2007) 0.80

Glenohumeral thermal capsulorrhaphy is not recommended--shoulder chondrolysis requires additional research. Arthroscopy (2007) 0.80

Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: disposition and outcome after 3- to 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.80

Cartilage treatment and biologics current research. Arthroscopy (2013) 0.79

Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative meniscus. Arthroscopy (2009) 0.79

Do anterior cruciate ligament allograft culture results correlate with clinical infections? Arthroscopy (2007) 0.78

Arthroscopic and sports medicine science: looking beyond the level of evidence (for now). Arthroscopy (2014) 0.78

Editorial Commentary: Hip Imaging Studies Suggest Significant Pathology in Asymptomatic Individuals. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.78

The Apprenticeship Model for Surgical Training Is Inferior. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.78

Preoperative demand matching is a valid indicator of patient activity after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2004) 0.78

Patient care, professionalism, and relations with industry. J Surg Orthop Adv (2008) 0.78

The skier's knee. Arthroscopy (2003) 0.77

Return to activity after knee arthroscopy. Arthroscopy (2007) 0.77

An ex vivo thermal chondroplasty model: the association of a char-like layer and underlying cell death. Arthroscopy (2006) 0.77

Editorial commentary: tissue engineering in knee arthroscopic and related surgery. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.77

Measuring arthroscopic outcome. Arthroscopy (2008) 0.77

Climbing the level of evidence ladder: prospective, comparative-effectiveness knee ACL and PCL research. Arthroscopy (2013) 0.77

Determination of factors influencing tissue effect of thermal chondroplasty: an ex vivo investigation. Arthroscopy (2006) 0.76

Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials. Arthroscopy (2008) 0.76

Does arthroscopic partial meniscectomy always cause arthritis? Sports Med Arthrosc (2012) 0.76

Editorial Commentary: Radiographic Inclusion and Exclusion Diagnostic Criteria for Femoroacetabular Impingement Require Confirmation. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial commentary: biologic enhancement of muscle and tendon healing. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Publication bias. Arthroscopy (2006) 0.75

Editorial commentary: healing requires scaffolds, growth factors, and cells. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Cutting-edge arthroscopic surgeons report excellent results for complex knee and shoulder conditions. Arthroscopy (2013) 0.75

Editorial commentary: scaffold-based cartilage treatments. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial Commentary: Operative Treatment of Primary Patellar Dislocation. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial Commentary: Hamstring Autografts Are More Frequently Associated With ACL Infection. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial Commentary: Operative Treatment of Patellar Dislocation. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial commentary: platelet-rich plasma in ACL surgery. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Saving our cells: advances in tissue engineering for focal cartilage defects. Arthroscopy (2009) 0.75

Editorial commentary: ACL tissue bioengineering clinical application is in its infancy. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Don't know much biology: redux. Arthroscopy (2008) 0.75

Editorial commentary: osteoarticular transplant outcomes may deteriorate over time. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: parts I and II. Am J Sports Med (2003) 0.75

Editorial commentary: meniscal tissue engineering. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial commentary: arthritis treatments for pain. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial commentary: meniscal allograft yields acceptable outcomes (for a salvage procedure). Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial Commentary: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery Requires Improved Radiologic Research and Expert Understanding of Hip Clinical Examination. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial commentary: autologous platelet-rich plasma. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopy Is a Generally Effective Treatment for Septic Arthritis. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Single- versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the complexity grows. Arthroscopy (2012) 0.75

Editorial Commentary: Shoulder Arthroscopy, Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Letter to the editor. Sports Health (2011) 0.75

Editorial commentary: osteochondral allografts are an effective treatment for large osteochondral lesions. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Editorial Commentary: ACL Reconstruction: Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75

Clinically relevant articles of high levels of evidence are required to change surgical practice. Arthroscopy (2007) 0.75

Editorial commentary: autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture. Arthroscopy (2015) 0.75