Published in J Mem Lang on August 01, 2009
The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language. Front Hum Neurosci (2012) 1.32
To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form. Top Cogn Sci (2012) 1.28
What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (2012) 1.05
Who is respectful? Effects of social context and individual empathic ability on ambiguity resolution during utterance comprehension. Front Psychol (2015) 0.79
Availability of Alternatives and the Processing of Scalar Implicatures: A Visual World Eye-Tracking Study. Cogn Sci (2015) 0.78
Production of Referring Expressions for an Unknown Audience: A Computational Model of Communal Common Ground. Front Psychol (2016) 0.75
Global Similarities and Multifaceted Differences in the Production of Partner-Specific Referential Pacts by Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front Psychol (2015) 0.75
Inferring Difficulty: Flexibility in the Real-time Processing of Disfluency. Lang Speech (2015) 0.75
The influence of partner-specific memory associations on picture naming: a failure to replicate Horton (2007). PLoS One (2014) 0.75
Do You Know What I Know? The Impact of Participant Role in Children's Referential Communication. Front Psychol (2016) 0.75
What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names. Front Psychol (2016) 0.75
The positive side of a negative reference: the delay between linguistic processing and common ground. R Soc Open Sci (2017) 0.75
Source monitoring. Psychol Bull (1993) 7.46
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected]. Psychol Rev (1994) 7.09
Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition (1986) 4.30
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (1996) 2.83
Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychol Sci (2000) 2.35
Development of shared information in communication despite hippocampal amnesia. Nat Neurosci (2005) 2.04
Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol Sci (2002) 1.91
The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition (2000) 1.86
Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition (1987) 1.82
Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. J Psycholinguist Res (1995) 1.66
The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition (2004) 1.48
The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition (2008) 1.40
Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue? Psychol Sci (2005) 1.34
The old and thee, uh, new: disfluency and reference resolution. Psychol Sci (2004) 1.29
If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (2007) 1.27
Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Top Cogn Sci (2009) 1.25
Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition (2007) 1.23
Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition (2008) 1.15
Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychon Bull Rev (2002) 1.12
Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. J Pers Soc Psychol (1966) 1.11
You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (2007) 0.90
The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming. Lang Cogn Process (2007) 0.88
Referential communication and category acquisition. J Exp Psychol Gen (1998) 0.83