Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information.

PubWeight™: 0.83‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 20177902)

Published in Psychol Res on February 24, 2010

Authors

Bradley R Sturz1, Kent D Bodily

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Psychology, Armstrong Atlantic State University, 229 Science Center, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA, 31419, USA. bradley.sturz@armstrong.edu

Articles cited by this

Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature (2002) 13.46

Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is. Am Psychol (1988) 4.45

A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition (1986) 3.54

Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon Bull Rev (2005) 2.83

Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci (2006) 2.34

Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 2.27

Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 1.96

Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychol Bull (2007) 1.79

Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci (2008) 1.78

Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (2005) 1.67

Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links. J Physiol Paris (2004) 1.63

Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput (1999) 1.53

Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (2007) 1.34

Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (2006) 1.18

Conditioning from an information processing perspective. Behav Processes (2003) 1.16

Visual homing in the absence of feature-based landmark information. Cognition (2008) 1.07

Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (2006) 1.05

Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive-combination view. Psychol Sci (2008) 1.04

A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). J Comp Psychol (2002) 1.02

Blocking in the spatial domain. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (1997) 0.97

Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry. Biol Lett (2005) 0.94

Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning. Q J Exp Psychol B (2003) 0.92

Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans. Anim Cogn (2006) 0.90

Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (2000) 0.89

Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments. Anim Cogn (2008) 0.89

Using perceptrons to explore the reorientation task. Cognition (2009) 0.81

Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol (2009) 0.80

Multiple-landmark piloting in pigeons (Columba livia): landmark configuration as a discriminative cue. J Comp Psychol (2002) 0.79

Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning. Behav Processes (2009) 0.78

Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning? Behav Processes (2009) 0.77

Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning. Psychon Bull Rev (2009) 0.76

The perception of spatial layout in real and virtual worlds. Ergonomics (1997) 0.75

Frames of reference in mobile augmented reality displays. J Exp Psychol Appl (2004) 0.75

Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans. Behav Processes (2009) 0.75

Encoding geometric and non-geometric information: a study with evolved agents. Anim Cogn (2009) 0.75

Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations. Anim Cogn (2009) 0.75

Articles by these authors

Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning. Comp Cogn Behav Rev (2007) 1.28

Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (2011) 1.18

Of global space or perceived place? Comment on Kelly et al. Biol Lett (2011) 1.03

Does constraining field of view prevent extraction of geometric cues for humans during virtual-environment reorientation? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (2013) 0.97

Learning strategies in matching to sample: if-then and configural learning by pigeons. Behav Processes (2007) 0.92

Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans. Anim Cogn (2006) 0.90

Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments. Anim Cogn (2008) 0.89

Is surface-based orientation influenced by a proportional relationship of shape parameters? Psychon Bull Rev (2011) 0.88

Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol (2009) 0.86

Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation. Psychon Bull Rev (2012) 0.78

Solving for two unknowns: an extension of vector-based models of landmark-based navigation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (2011) 0.78

No evidence that consistent auditory cues facilitate learning of spatial relations among locations. Behav Processes (2012) 0.76

On Discriminating between Geometric Strategies of Surface-Based Orientation. Front Psychol (2012) 0.75

Dissociation of past and present experience in problem solving using a virtual environment. Cyberpsychol Behav (2009) 0.75

Overtraining and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation. Psychol Res (2012) 0.75